Jump to content

myuglyduck

Noob
  • Posts

    11
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Fire
    myuglyduck got a reaction from zlatan61 in Weekend Stream + Giveaway   
    myuglyduck 
  2. Fire
    myuglyduck got a reaction from MSADnica in 🥇 $7,000 The Return of the King | VIP Slots 🎰   
    casino:478137920878
    casino:478137920878
    casino:478137920878
    casino:478137920878
  3. Fire
    myuglyduck got a reaction from MdSHBiR247 in 🥇 $7,000 The Return of the King | VIP Slots 🎰   
    casino:478137920878
    casino:478137920878
    casino:478137920878
    casino:478137920878
  4. Fire
    myuglyduck got a reaction from KaiZidan in 🔥 If Stake Gave You $100 Free Right Now… What Would You Do? 🔥   
    Play mines or any other slot and withdraw hehehe
  5. Fire
    myuglyduck got a reaction from Jeysi12 in baccarat gods   
    Don't know how to play it
  6. Hmm
    myuglyduck got a reaction from Klaudusia in Keno!!   
    I hope I know how to play you and win on you
  7. Ooo
    myuglyduck reacted to raitx in A “Creative Competition” Should Reward Creativity   
    I doubt it's fair anyways. Prizes are mostly given to mods and their buddies. They could make it transparent how they pick winners, but they don't. That's why I didn't even bother to participate.
  8. Ooo
    myuglyduck reacted to sumitsehgal8 in A “Creative Competition” Should Reward Creativity   
    I want to address something about the recent “Eddie’s Missing” Creative Competition because I think many participants feel the same disappointment.
    The event was heavily presented as a creative competition — with storytelling, themed submissions, community participation, and encouragement for people to put effort into creating unique entries. Naturally, many of us assumed this meant creativity, originality, effort, and quality would actually influence the outcome.
    People spent hours:
    creating edits
    designing submissions
    searching for details
    brainstorming ideas
    putting genuine effort into participating
    because the competition was framed in a way that suggested merit-based judging.
    However, the winners announcement later stated that winners were:
    “randomly selected players who guessed right.”
    That completely changes the nature of the competition.
    A random draw and a creative contest are not the same thing.
    If winner selection was always intended to be random among correct submissions, then creativity and effort ultimately had no influence on the result. Someone who spent 5 minutes had the same odds as someone who spent 5 hours crafting a thoughtful entry.
    That’s the disappointing part.
    This is not about being upset over losing. Losing is part of every competition. The issue is about transparency and expectation.
    Calling something a “creative competition” creates the expectation that entries will be evaluated creatively. If randomness determines the winners, then the event should be clearly presented as a giveaway, raffle, or random participation draw from the beginning.
    Many participants invested real time and energy because they believed the quality of their work mattered.
    A more fair and transparent system could have been:
    judged winners based on creativity
    community voting
    shortlisted best entries
    separate prizes for random participation
    But presenting it as a creative competition while selecting winners randomly feels misleading to a lot of participants.
    I’m posting this respectfully because I genuinely think transparency matters in community events like these. People are far more willing to participate when expectations are clear and effort is actually valued.

    @Jake7589
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Privacy Policy Terms of Use