GuilhermeSa

Maybe the person doing Stake's "random draws" has a bad memory and doesn't realize that the same name has already appeared 7 other times for them.

Just now I saw this tweet from Syztmz announcing the results of his personal draw and when I saw that @/darkmoon11111, who is someone I mentioned here before, also won, I thought: "what if I search for these people on the Stake profile?" Well, I found a lot of stuff, I don't know what to think about this shit. Of the 10 who won in the Syztmz draw, 5 of them are frequent Stake winners. **I'm not accusing Syztmz of anything, I don't even know if he is sponsored by Stake or not, I just took the winners to check. - In total, 4 people not yet mentioned in this topic will win 19 times. First @/kisifer won 4 times in 8 months. Second is @/veso7abvbg1 who won 3 times in 11 months Third is @/kasperhcs who won 7 times in 7 months, an incredible average. Fourth person is @/SilverZerg who won 5 times in 10 monthly

Is this Darkmoon11111 known? I do not know who it is.

For you who are on the other side of this story, it really isn't strange to me that you thought it was normal, that you're just a lucky guy. It turns out that for a large part of the community it is not. Mathematically, it is not normal for there to be SO MANY repeat winners as shown in this topic in draws that take place with the participation of 3 to 5 thousand people. Not even if there was just one frequent winner, imagine 10. Remembering that this is just a small, very small analysis of 7 draw results.

I put together the post in the middle of the night in the middle of my sleep, I certainly made a mistake in my calculations.

It's bizarre how EVERY draw has at least one person who wins frequently. I analyzed the results of the RANDOM winners announced 8 hours ago and THREE OF THEM together have already won 15 draws. - @/Dipesh_Uraon has won 7 times in 13 months - @/0113sksk has won 5 in 13 months. There is a third also @/OvidiuNitu1 who won 3 times in 13 months. Out of 5 RANDOM winners, 3 have won together, in total, 15 draws to date. Yes, it's a draw based on luck, trust it.

I also think that he is actually the person responsible for choosing, but unfortunately if he is employed by Stake, she is responsible for that. There is nowhere to run, in the end Stake is responsible for not monitoring.

[Counter of frequently winning users: 28] [Total sum of giveaways won by 28 people: 136] Today I want to prove to you that Stake giveaways on Twitter should not be taken seriously when they inform you that people are chosen at random, implying that we all have equal chances, but in reality it is not quite like that. There are people who are privileged for reasons we don't know. **I'm updating with more information about other frequent winners in the comments of this topic. Many of us know how frustrating it is to stay on Stake's Twitter, interacting and always participating in the "giveaways" they do and the overwhelming majority have NEVER been drawn. Of course, there are thousands of people participating in the draws, some tweets with 3, 4 and even 5 thousand responses. There are a lot of people and of course not everyone will win. Let's be realistic, our chances are low, but still knowing that it can happen that a person wins once, even twice. It's acceptable if we do the math. However, many of us who follow Stake's Twitter, as well as the announcement of the winners of these draws who are informed that the choice is RANDOM, often see winners who have already won several other times. This is a bit strange, since there are many people participating and some people even win several times in a short period of time, but how is this possible? Let's start with someone I've already mentioned here on the forum before. He's a stake streamer, 'Diegus Money Maker'. Diegus "won" 7 Stake draws in the last 13 months, 6 of them in the last 8 months. The last 4 draws he "won" were in the last 60 days. Yes, he "won" 4 times in two months. (Prints below) I opened all the tweets he won, got the number of participants, and got the percentage chance he had of winning each one. After doing this with the 7 draws, I had these percentages below. Here are prints of all the draws he would have "won". Now you might think, "Ah, but that's just a big coincidence. If there's a trillion-fold chance of him achieving this, then it could happen." However, what if I told you that there are other, MANY other people as lucky as Diegus or even more than him? I decided to ONLY analyze the last 6 draw results released by Stake. I confess that I didn't think I would find other cases, I thought it would be a waste of time, but I was wrong. I FOUND 6 WEIRD and absurd CASES as much as Diegus's! In the first one, @/darkmoon11111 won 5 times recently, 4 of them in 45 days. In the second @/lucas1111x also won 7 times, and in the last 8 months he won 6 times. Third we have @/maitaibrowneye who has won 4 times in the last 3 and a half months. Fourth person is @/naoan0405 who won 6 times in 13 months. Fifth is @/mnhat42 who has won 6 times in the last 12 months. Lastly we have @/plate15 who won 3 times in 2 and a half months. These were JUST the last 6 results I analyzed, imagine how many more cases of EXTREMELY lucky people I wouldn't find? Do you really think this is pure luck? I am not! Just one more comment. Of course there are people who win, but the point is that strangely many people win multiple times, some even more than once in a day and this is frustrating for the rest of the community. And the fact that there is no transparency on social media tarnishes the brand's image and opens up gaps for these doubts to fall within the betting site. Direct links to comments in this thread with other "random" winners: +3 https://stakecommunity.com/topic/87157-10-clues-twitter-giveaways-are-not-based-on-luck/?do=findComment&comment=1932068 +4 https://stakecommunity.com/topic/87157-10-clues-twitter-giveaways-are-not-based-on-luck/?do=findComment&comment=1932679 +1 https://stakecommunity.com/topic/87157-14-proofs-twitter-giveaways-are-not-based-on-luck/?do=findComment&comment=1933520 +1 https://stakecommunity.com/topic/87157-15-proofs-twitter-giveaways-are-not-based-on-luck/?do=findComment&comment=1940530 +6 https://stakecommunity.com/topic/87157-16-proofs-twitter-giveaways-are-not-based-on-luck/?do=findComment&comment=1942350 +6 https://stakecommunity.com/topic/87157-22-proofs-twitter-giveaways-are-not-based-on-luck/?do=findComment&comment=1950288

ih rapaz