I think to be fair, The prize pool for Video Poker shall be $2000 as well. I know the rule is, if less than 200 attended, the prize would be only half, but I believe it was defenitely 400/500 players tried to finish this task, and due to the fact it was too hard to complete, only 155 of us were able to complete the job. Since it was so hard to finish, while most players spent so much more extra efforts to complete this event, the payout prize pool shall remain the same as previous event, but not be cut into half.
Hello Bojana,
I have some concerns regarding one of your rule here. Dont get me wrong, I am the type person that trying my best to follow all the rules whereever I go.
I believe all the rules were made to regulating peoples at the time it was introduced. It did a good job to regulate all of our chat rooms for sure. But, it doesn't mean those rules won't go out of dates. From my understanding to rule #8, I believe stake did not want players discusing about streamers because back then, all the popular slot streamers were host their shows on Twitch and a lot of them were repersenting other casinos as well. The rule was prefect at that time in order to protect Stake Casino's best of interests within our community and There was no doubt about that.
But,at that time, if someone told you that Stake Casino would open their own live boardcasting stream website in the near future, you probabbly would think that person was crazy. And not even 5 years later, Kick.com already went on live, but growing rapidly on both numbers of streamers and viewers on a daily basis. The major reason behind kick.com's successful launch was because of the huge volumes of players that Stake Casino had to backed up with to the site. In additional, Eddie/Steve were also trying their best during their streaming to bring attentinos to more and more casinio players to watch streamers that are boardcasting on kick.com( either casino related or not).
Based on today's situation, I think there should be some exceptions adding into rule #8. In fact,to mute players tthat tried to promote Kick.com or streamers sponsored by Stake Casino does not acting at the best interests to the Casino at all. Therefore, I suggest to put some exception to the rule#8 that , as long as the topic is relating to streamers within our community, or relating to kick.com, then It should be allowed.
Again, how is it fair to a player to face a 7 days ban just because he was trying to promote a streamer that sponsored by Stake Casino While in another hand, Eddie was even paying our casino players during his stream every Friday night to watch streamers on Kick.com.
Any thought on that?