bobdole Posted November 2, 2018 #1 Posted November 2, 2018 I was trying to find a big win I had in Plinko a while ago so I went over to my statistics but if you've made a lot of bets since then it's nearly impossible to find going page after page. I was thinking it would help if we could maybe get some kind of "sort by" drop down menu much like you would see on an online store. Maybe even a personal legends type board that we can see what our top wins in an organized fashion. I could be wrong that this is the only way to find a bet made a while ago and if there's an easier way I'd love to hear it. What do you guys think of the way statistics is laid out? Should it remain simple or more complicated?
williamshennie9 Posted November 2, 2018 #2 Posted November 2, 2018 At the moment, all statistics are laid out in order from the most recent bets to the oldest bets. So, I do agree in a way, if you are specifically looking for an old bet, it may be challenging to locate.
Etude Posted November 2, 2018 #3 Posted November 2, 2018 I guess you just need to keep clicking "Next" button until you find it for now. Maybe the developers can take into consideration a sorting or search function for Statistic section of the account.
testB Posted November 2, 2018 #4 Posted November 2, 2018 I think I've made suggestions along those lines on their feedback site, but no idea whether they considered them worth adding. It's pretty inconvenient to go through at the moment, agreed.
irawk0 Posted November 2, 2018 #5 Posted November 2, 2018 Great idea, some kind of filter that shows only wins/losses, or a search option where you can search by date, or a bet amount requirement (e.g. only showing bets above 3k satoshi/whatever currency you have selected or only profits of 6k+) would be wonderful.
EddieFx Posted November 2, 2018 #6 Posted November 2, 2018 This would be nice, like highest bet, highest multiplier, highest win or oldest and so on! Very good idea, I like it!
Featured Comment
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.