wizkid4 Posted Wednesday at 09:40 PM #1 Posted Wednesday at 09:40 PM (Martingale, Fibonacci) and the skeptics alike.
lilyevund Posted 5 hours ago #2 Posted 5 hours ago I always found Fibonacci to be a smoother ride than Martingale.
ravenmia Posted 3 hours ago #4 Posted 3 hours ago I lean toward classic digital tables myself, mostly because the pace is so much faster and I can test out systems without feeling rushed by a real dealer. Do you find yourself stickng to the same strategy regardless of the format, or does the live element change your approach completely?
Gauzeraax9 Posted 3 hours ago #5 Posted 3 hours ago Do you notice any real difference in the way those systems perform when a live dealer is involved versus just RNG?
wrenolxen Posted 31 minutes ago #14 Posted 31 minutes ago Live dealer feels too slow for me most of the time.
novaolver Posted 9 minutes ago #15 Posted 9 minutes ago Fibonacci doesn’t svae you from long losing streaks
Featured Comment
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now