Do you prefer Live Dealer games or the classic digital versions?

[wizkid4]

(Martingale, Fibonacci) and the skeptics alike.

[lilyevund]

I always found Fibonacci to be a smoother ride than Martingale.

[Kendallenora]

Fibonacci kept me afloat last month, no joke.

[ravenmia]

I lean toward classic digital tables myself, mostly because the pace is so much faster and I can test out systems without feeling rushed by a real dealer. Do you find yourself stickng to the same strategy regardless of the format, or does the live element change your approach completely?

[Gauzeraax9]

Do you notice any real difference in the way those systems perform when a live dealer is involved versus just RNG?

[oscardonn]

I prefer dealer

[Cryptoboy997]

Nice post, thanks for sharing!

[Lokixox1.]

I actually prefer live dealer

[Samsungy]

Live

[chinyereezeh]

I think the classic digital version 

[Qwertyyuillaks]

I prefer live dealer games

[Temitm]

Dealer games

[Heywhysmart]

Can’t pick 

I prefer both 

[wrenolxen]

Live dealer feels too slow for me most of the time.

[novaolver]

Fibonacci doesn’t svae you from long losing streaks

[blazingsaga]

tbh i still lean digital becuase the speed is way better, live dealer is fun but i get impatient lol

[raxtha68]

live dealer stresses me out honestly, I always end up overthinking the pace and mkaing silly bets. digital is my comfort zone were I can just autoplay and chill.

[Sydneyki]

i dunno the slow pace of live dealer actually helps me think clearer instead of rushing bets like i do on digital

[oduolaha]

Yes

[Jheriswago]

i feel the live is more natural 

[MainG]

Him

[Buildfocus]

Live dealer games

[patricia433]

Classic digital ones

[samuel225]

Dealer gsne

[Modupe]

Either