wizzyyy Posted July 9 #1 Posted July 9 The first-ever 48-team World Cup brought us remarkable group-stage drama and unique matchups like Haiti vs. Scotland and Germany vs. Curaçao. While some feared a dilution of quality, the expanded knockout rounds (starting at the Round of 32) provided non-stop entertainment. Has this format expansion been a massive success for global football?
Rebeccaroberts Posted July 9 #2 Posted July 9 It has actually delivered The so called smaller nations like Cape Verde and Curaçao actually gave us good matches. I don’t know what will happen if it goes to 64 though. That feels like a step too far.
firelord ozai Posted July 9 #3 Posted July 9 Instead of increasing number of teams, we should actually increase number of gameplay, they should be 1st and 2nd leg once it gets to the knockout stage, like the UCL.. World cup should be played for more than a month, this is football
clottedateries8 Posted July 9 #4 Posted July 9 Honestly the smaller nations brought way more energy than I expected, but some of those group games were still proper snoozefests tbh. It delivered on chaos but maybe not pure quality.
Emberenne0 Posted July 9 #5 Posted July 9 Tbh, the chaos was the best part — some matches were rough but the pure drama made up for it. 64 would be overkill though, this format already feels right on the limit.
luxori Posted July 9 #6 Posted July 9 Honestly the chaos factor was a massive win, those wild matchups made every group feel alive even when the football wasn't perfect. But yeah 64 would be pushing it, this already feels like the sweet spot between spectacle and quality.
peltlyn Posted July 9 #8 Posted July 9 Some of those underdog matches were electric, ngl, but I did doze off during a couple of the more lopsided group games 😂 the drama definitely carried the format though.
sophnda Posted July 9 #9 Posted July 9 Tbh the chaos was worth it even if some games were rough—seeing teams like Haiti and Curaçao get their moment on that stage was pure vibes
Krxtha Posted July 9 #10 Posted July 9 ngl the chaos definitely made it worth it, some of those group games were rough but the underdog moments were pure gold
pyxraess Posted July 10 #11 Posted July 10 I nearly spilled my drink when Scotland equalised against Haiti, proper heart attack moment
luxori Posted July 11 #12 Posted July 11 I get the fun of seeing new teams but honestly the Round of 32 felt a bit empty, too many mismatches where the ouutcome was obvious from kickoff.
Sydneyki Posted July 11 #14 Posted July 11 I get that the underdog stories were fun, but calling it a massive success feels a bit generous when half the group stage was just waiting to see which big team would smash someone 5 0. The entertainment value in the knockouts was real though, even if it felt like we had to wade through a lot of filler to get there.
strikeienne Posted July 11 #15 Posted July 11 Honestly I was skeptical till I watched the Germany Curaçao match at a packed pub and the whole place erupted when Curaçao nearly snuck a second goal, it made the group stage feel alive in a way the old format never did. The extra knockout round stretched the tension out longer too, my mate who barely follows football stayed glued to the screen for three straight weekends.
Luxva Posted July 11 #16 Posted July 11 Watching those wild group games reminded me to double check my phone nottifications were off, one spoiler alert during the Curaçao near miss and the pub would've rioted.
nylaezyl Posted July 11 #19 Posted July 11 i liked the underdog moments but tbh the 48 team format made the group stage feel too long for me, like i was just slogging through matches waiting for the real tournament to start
cedarosienne4 Posted July 11 #20 Posted July 11 I actually enjoyed the extra chaos and unexpected results, it ketp me way more engaged than the usual same old matchups.
Phantioora Posted July 11 #21 Posted July 11 I get the excitement around the upsets but it felt like some groups had one legit contender and three teams just happy to be there. Makes the knockout bracket more predictable than usual in my opinion.
emanuel7218 Posted July 11 #22 Posted July 11 Obviamente que mejoro el formato y talvez deberían de analizarlo a aumentar los equipos así se ven más sorpresas en el mundial un claro ejemplo es cabo verde
syness Posted July 11 #23 Posted July 11 just watch the knockouts and skip most of the group stage honestly
nevivi Posted July 12 #24 Posted July 12 ngl, it was mad seeing teams like haiti shine on the big stage ? the chaos was kinda fun, but any more teams might be a bit much bro
irisuress Posted July 13 #25 Posted July 13 I was ready to hate the 48 team mess but honestly the random first round matchups made it way more watchable than the same old 32 team safety picks we alwayys get. I will take an uneven group full of chaos over a snoozy bracket that feels rigged from day one
Featured Comment
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now