Jump to content

Is That What People Call Bad Luck? ​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​:D


Carollzinha

Featured Comment

Posted

Trying the Daily Telegram Challenge a few minutes ago I was not having any luck to hit the "7" then I changed my seed.. still took me "a while" to hit it, thought about changing the seed again but as the challenge was already 9/10 winners I kept that seed, wanted to see how many bets I would need to hit the number 7.. and there is the answer!

It took me exactly 220 rolls in the same seed to hit it so I am wondering.. is that what people call bad luck? How much would I have busted if I would be playing martingale, as I normally do? lol

There is the bet ID in case anyone want to check

  • Client Seed (nonced): Giveaways-329

ROULETTE: 4,268,201,555

placed by Caroll on 06/04/2019

Wagered

0.00000001 ltc.svg

Multiplier

36x

Profit

0.00000035 ltc.svg

 

what a luck.png

Posted

It took me a ton of rolls just to hit the 7 .

I think out of almost 1000 rolls i might have hit the number 7 maybe 4 or 5 times.

Posted

I tried with my usual seed took me a while to hit too. 

When playing roulette chasing a single number isn't a safe strat at all. We did it only to do the challenge.. So to me it's not bad luck at all. 

And you talk about martingale..  But playing martingale ( I don't recommend that at all its not a winning stratefy to the long term) requires a x2 odd..  While chasing a single number is x30..  If you want to play martingale at the roulette pick a color that fit better the martingale strat. 

I would add that changing seed doesn't affect numbers drawn.   It's just give a feeling  of attracting luck.  I don't know if I'm understandable? 

Good luck anyway mate

Posted
28 minutes ago, nikowin88 said:

And you talk about martingale..  But playing martingale ( I don't recommend that at all its not a winning stratefy to the long term) requires a x2 odd..  While chasing a single number is x30..  If you want to play martingale at the roulette pick a color that fit better the martingale strat. 

I normally play martingale when chasing a single number and it always works for me.. but the longest red streak I ever had for a single number was something around 100.. I would never expect a 219 red streak before hitting it (and I bet most all people would not expect it to take that long as well lol)

 

3 minutes ago, barbaris said:

The number 7 started falling out to me very often after the competition, I call this failure. Playing martingale, you can easily lower the entire balance.

A few days ago I managed to hit 5x the number 13 in less than 20 rolls (that's why 13 is my lucky number :P ) but sadly my base bet was 100 satoshis only lol

Posted

ugh how though, i never gotten above 60-80 bets before getting a win when only betting on one number, xD  i mean u would of been broken if u had martingale the full 200+ bets

Posted

The funny thing is I hit 7 so many times in today's challenge (sadly none of my bets ended in 77 though). This just goes to show why martingale is such a bad idea, because losses like this are possible, though very unlikely...

Posted
5 hours ago, williamshennie9 said:

The funny thing is I hit 7 so many times in today's challenge (sadly none of my bets ended in 77 though). This just goes to show why martingale is such a bad idea, because losses like this are possible, though very unlikely...

So it seems I am the unlikely queen :P Can't forget at PD during a live stream (like 2 years ago) when it took me over 300 bets to hit a 10x multiplier and it made me bust over 0.06 BTC then I still tried with 0 satoshis to see how long it would take and it still took a long time lol

Posted

 

I continued playing roulette after the end of the drawing, so 77 did not fall in the identifier, about changing the sid, it’s not a fact that you would be lucky, we don’t know exactly how it all worked out

Posted

Well... it is pretty shitty by any standards lol... but I once was playing dice on 6x and I got 532 reds in a row - The odds of that are 1 in like 540 quadrillion....  so I have come to learn that provably means "not even a fucking little". Expect the impossible at all times -_-

Posted
4 hours ago, Mikehoncho said:

I keep missing the giveaways. 

I would call that a rather dry streak  though. It does happen though. 

Better luck next time.

2 days ago I missed the 0.4 ETH Mines Challenge by 30 seconds.. I even tried to post in the chat as Edward normally add extra spot when the winners are so close to be in the rank but due to all that spam people use to do in the chat (hoping that it will increase their chances to win the rains lol) I couldn't win it as nobody but @Flansca noticed my bet xD 

  • Moderator
Posted
On 4/7/2019 at 2:09 PM, Carollzinha said:

2 days ago I missed the 0.4 ETH Mines Challenge by 30 seconds.. I even tried to post in the chat as Edward normally add extra spot when the winners are so close to be in the rank but due to all that spam people use to do in the chat (hoping that it will increase their chances to win the rains lol) I couldn't win it as nobody but @Flansca noticed my bet xD 

Okay, today too, this happened to me @Carollzinha. Yep, this one, you know? I was excited to get that, but it was lost one.. and..yeah. xD 

ROULETTE: 4,370,527,777

placed by flansca on 10/04/2019

Wagered

0.00000001 doge.svg

Multiplier

0x

Profit

-0.00000001 doge.svg

I don't have much word to say now, instead emotionally drops after peek over the result of bet ids. 

Posted
25 minutes ago, Flansca said:

Okay, today too, this happened to me @Carollzinha. Yep, this one, you know? I was excited to get that, but it was lost one.. and..yeah. xD 

ROULETTE: 4,370,527,777

placed by flansca on 10/04/2019

Wagered

0.00000001 doge.svg

Multiplier

0x

Profit

-0.00000001 doge.svg

I don't have much word to say now, instead emotionally drops after peek over the result of bet ids. 

I know this feeling @Flansca.. last night I got so pissed off that I even went to sleep right after.. for the Steve's team challenge I had a bet ID with .x44.444 but needed it to be over 99.78 but instead I had an under 0.22 number (which is the other side of what I was playing).. that really drived me crazy that I even left the computer after that xDxDxD 

Posted

Yup that is definitely a proof that you have bad luck with you xD . But we can't blame luck because the game is so frickin hard to predict the next hit where it would be. 

Posted

hello friends i am also feeling same ,when not a single giveaway win till now but its hit after all winners declared.its happen to me last three giveaway,there is a luck factor is most essential , its not with u ,you can't win   in any game.

Posted

yesterday tele giveaways was also in roullette in a different roll hunt you need to hit the bet i.d ending 7777, i busted 3m eth but no 7777 comes ;) i think its pure luck coz as we can see some are hitting it easily ;) 

  • 1 month later...
Posted

no is not called bad luck.. with 220 rolls which number came out more or numbers.. should have kept a little chart...if you ever gonna try that again, write down what numbers came out in that many rolls.. choose 6 numbers.. but bet 3.. from those three set an amount rolls to see what numbers came out,, then rotate the next three..do the same thing..then chance the combinations of the numbers.. you will see the progress of wins..u get...this is one of strategy that worked very well,, 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Privacy Policy Terms of Use