Morgan rogers

[Bright_]

His he good for arsenal 

[voxlyn]

Nah not Arsenal level yet, he's still raw. Needs another season or two at Villa before a move like that makes sense.

[Bright_]

Real but arsenal needs a winger 

[kendallari]

He's cooking at Villa but Arsenal need a proven difference-maker now, not another project.

[xorus868]

He’s good but not the immediate upgrade Arsenal need rn, they should be aiming higher this summer

[nyxund54]

Tbh he's doing bits at Villa but Arsenal need someone who walks straight into that LW spot, not another guy who needs time to cook.

[sophetoria444]

He is in that weird spot where he is too good for the bench but not yet polished enough to start week in week out for a title chasing side. I actually think he would cook in a system that lets him roam a bit more centrally instead of being stuck out wide all game.

[vaelixmia]

Saw him score live last month, kid has crazy legs.

[thoxurus]

id take williams over him easy, rogers still feels too raw for a title push

[INTIB]

arsenal need a winners mate..

[onyxarys]

proper baller but honestly think his game suits a counter attacking side more than what we do, would probably frustrate us with his final ball at times

[0megaMage]

ngl ngl he got talent but for arsenal rn nah, feels more like a maybe later move than a bet now ?

[maxxv30j]

yeah he got talent ngl but for arsenal rn feels like another project, not teh guy to win em the league no cap

[luxelle]

Think he’d be like a lively cup game option but catn picture him locking down that role week in week out in the league just yet. Feels more like a smart bet for some team outside the top four that’d start him every match.

[ravique]

Watched him live against us last season and he kept drifting into half spaces where Ødegaard already operates, the overlap just cluttered everythig in the final third. Feels like a signing that looks smart on paper but muddies the system unless Arteta drastically shifts how we build attacks.

[Peltaeund]

I saw him bully a backline at Villa Park once but then miss two sitters from six yards out in the same match, that sums up the gamble really.

[kyrvi]

Every time I see a player linked with us and the question is just "is he good for arsenal" I wonder if people mean for the starting XI or for the bench because those are two wildly different answers for someone like Rogers.

[raxummia]

honestly the lads got that raw pace and diirectness we sometimes lack but hes more of a super sub vibe right now, wouldnt lump on him to start at 1.85 odds or anything

[Ravellor]

If we’re talking starter I don’t see it yet, his end product is way too inconsistent for a team trying to push City. As a bench spark though he could cause prblems with that pace, much better gamble for cup runs than throwing him into the deep end in the league.

[onyxerra]

Dunno about starting but he'd be chaos off the bench when legs are tired.

[Lyrawyn]

He runs hard and that directness is something we could use but I worry he'd just be another body who fluffs too many chances when it matters.

[yxanelle04]

Rogers definitely fits taht chaotic winger profile who can make things happen out of nothing, but his final ball is still a bit of a coin toss. Feels like he'd shine more against tired legs where his lack of polish gets masked a little

[pyxkaess0]

For me it really comes down to whether you see him filling that Martinelli type role or just being a chaos option late in matches, cause his work rate is there but the decision making in the final third still feels a bit raw. Do you think he’d actually suit our system or would we have to adjust how we play just to get the best out of him

[BlueDweb3]

A good player

[abubakar Nasiru]

Hmm