Jump to content

Banker Or Player?


ZiraGambles

Featured Comment

Posted

Hey Stake,

I love Baccarat but I seem to lose very badly on the banker side.

 

I just wanted to start a small little poll on which you prefer.

Comment Below "Player" or "Banker" & a brief description on why

Posted

I prefer to alternate bets. If I see a long green line at the player, I bet on the banker several times in a row. I even bet constantly on a draw and I was surprised that you can earn more on a draw than on a player or banker.

Posted

If anything I would preferably to place my bet on Player since Banker takes a percentage of your winnings away. Even so nothing is fixed in stone since you can't just bet a single option and hope that it would consecutively win everytime.

Posted

I'm not a big fan of online Baccarat, but I do enjoy playing it live at land based casinos from time to time.  Having said that, when I play I almost always bet on the Banker simply because it has a slight edge in the long run.  I will also throw a bit on the tie every few hands if there hasn't been one in a while.  I almost never bet on the Player unless there has been a long Banker winning streak.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Apparently the banker has an advantage, but I don't quite know what that is. I usually just bet on the player, since the payout is slightly higher than the banker. If anyone knows what the banker advantage is, please let me know :)

Posted

The tiems ive played Baccarat i feel like its always usually one side or the other. like one side is favored more then the other for a long time. or after alot of bets. 
Now that i think about it i dont know why i dont play it more often really. I guess ill go play it now lol. 

Posted

For me i usually pick a "Player" because its 1:1 . so when i use martingale style it would be easy to recover when we lose. but sometimes i use banker too if i have a bad feelings with Player table

Posted

I choose Player, cause sometimes it is very easy to recover if betting on the player side, although I don't play baccarat that much, I'd still consider betting on Player and Tie the most of the times because I can easily recover my satoshis in a couple of bets on the same side, cause most of the time for me it only hits player or ties, so you can make good money out of that game, although I feel like the game is underrated and is just asking to be deleted because of its irrelevancy, if they'd made the game multiplayer maybe it would attract more attention and it wouldn't be as irrelevant as it is right now, it's not in the  best of a situation now.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I always choose tie but i dont play the game anymore. I choose players i because eh why not ? If you dont believe on yourself then who would it is you who should believe in yourself for win. 

Posted

I always bet on players because of the slightly higher payout is has over the banker. If there has been a dry spell of ties, then i'll bet on it. I don't now if there are even any real strategies on baccarat...you don't even need any game knowledge to influence the house edge

Posted

I don't know i never seem to win more then twice in a row, doesn't matter if i choose banker or player on even switch when betting. I don't realy like this gamemode and there are other gamemodes that are much and much better then baccarat.

Posted

I still don't understand the baccarat game, if we choose a player we will get multiplier 2 but if we choose a banker then we can only get a multiplier of 1.98 why is it not the same as when we choose a player? Is the banker's chance to win more than the player? but if I choose him between it is clear I choose the player who has multiplier 2.

Posted

I bet on player most of the time because you don't get all your winnings on banker. I change sides if there are streaks though, like I got five times green on player then for sure banker will have a revenge streaks too.

Posted

I used to bet on the player and I can say that I often beat, so I changed my betting strategy.  I'll bet on the player three times in a row and if I win three times I'll just change and bet on the banker three times too and if I win again. Then I'll change the bet this time around the tie, and there I found out that you get bigger when you bet on the tie and then you win.

So far I can say that's my effective strategy. I do that over and over again.

Posted

the ratio between the dealer and player.. the player has a very high chance in winning then the dealer does.so player is the way to go but bet it right you get a better high chance in getting a tie and and not lose any profit. 

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Honestly I do very well on the banker side. I always think of it as betting on the casino winning? But I don't really understand baccarat to begin with so it doesn't matter xD

You could try Tie and see how that does? 

Posted

sometimes I play install diplayer sometimes in bankers and most often I install in players because the payout is 2x if the banker payout is only 1.95x only on baccarat.

I also often combine players and ties or bankers with ties as well when playing baccarat.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

hmmm i dont get it you 
some peeps say you prefer player cuz banker takes some % 
but with banker dosnt you have more odds to win ?
isnt it like the same?
aint it like play with 50% chance to win on dice lol i dont get it 
btw i did couple of all ins on baccarat and i did it on player as well xD haha 

Posted
On 9/28/2019 at 8:50 AM, iamsheikhadil said:

I would say it depends on my luck lol.

If I am feeling very lucky I'll place it on "player" but if am not feeling lucky, I'll place bet on banker since that's reverse psychology lol

Kinda same with me.xD Even if it doesn't matter at all, sometimes you might feel that you're the player.xD

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Privacy Policy Terms of Use