Football debate

[Feranzyy]

Rodri or Vitihnia

 

[ravique]

Rodri is a wall but Vitihnia has that spark going forward. Honestly depends if my team needs steel or creativity that day, I'd probably lean Vitihnia just for the flair.

[Feranzyy]

16 hours ago, ravique said:

Rodri is a wall but Vitihnia has that spark going forward. Honestly depends if my team needs steel or creativity that day, I'd probably lean Vitihnia just for the flair.

I get your point but based on their performance at the ongoing worldcup which is a better player

 

[luckyvertex21]

Tough call! Rodri's proven himself in big moments, but Vitinha has a lot of potential. Who are you leaning towards?

[Mackboro02]

Mbappe or Bellingham?

[diegowolf]

Rodri anchors everything and you feel his absence so much more. Vitinah is flashy on the ball but I've seen him disappear in physical matches, gimme the sure thing every time

[orbw1yt8f2]

Rodri all day for me his reading of the game is just next level even if he dosnt always get the higlhight reel moments.

[BlueRoll78]

Tough call! Rodri brings that solid midfield presence, but Vitinha's flair can really light up a game. What are you leaning towards?

[zedy5bybn9j]

Rodri jus reads the game like hes got a sixth sence or somethin.

[LuckyVision81]

Tough choice! Rodri's a beast in midfield, but Vitor's got that exciting flair. What kind of game do you prefer?