DefconBlue147 Posted 5 hours ago #33 Posted 5 hours ago I think it should, this would make them get more action during the 90 minutes
giftig Posted 5 hours ago #34 Posted 5 hours ago Extra time keeps things interesting and there's room for some magic
startfromddust Posted 5 hours ago #37 Posted 5 hours ago Where then is the suspense from the last minutes of the game. So, no, no, not, nay, it shouldn't be removed
BigAdahunse Posted 5 hours ago #41 Posted 5 hours ago No, let's see if more time can give us a winner
fawazzz Posted 5 hours ago #43 Posted 5 hours ago Yes extra time should be given So the game will be very interesting and breathtaking
MatthewDFG11 Posted 5 hours ago #44 Posted 5 hours ago 30 minutes ago, imoohie said: ⏱️ Should Extra Time Be Removed and Matches Go Straight to Penalties? Fuootball has always relied on extra time to decide knockout matches when teams are level after 90 minutes. However, many fans now believe it's time to rethink the rule. Some argue that going straight to penalties would make the game more exciting, while others believe extra time is an essential part of football. Supporters of removing extra time say it would reduce player fatigue, lower the risk of injuries, and help players recover better during busy tournaments. With modern football becoming more demanding, saving players from an additional 30 minutes could improve the quality of future matches. On the other hand, many fans believe extra time creates unforgettable moments. Legendary goals, dramatic comebacks, and tactical battles often happen during those 30 minutes. It also gives teams another opportunity to win through football rather than relying entirely on the unpredictability of a penalty shootout. A possible compromise would be to keep extra time in major finals but allow other knockout matches to go directly to penalties. This could reduce player workload while preserving the tradition of extra time in the biggest games. Discussion Questions Should football remove extra time completely? Are penalty shootouts a fair way to decide matches? Does extra time make football more exciting or simply exhaust players? What changes would you make to the knockout format? My Opinion: I believe extra time should remain. While penalties are exciting, football matches should, whenever possible, be decided through open play rather than a shootout. Extra time often produces unforgettable moments that become part of football history. What's your opinion? Should football keep extra time or go straight to penalties? ⚽🔥 Extra time is exciting, unforgettable memories might be created in it. So I would not recommend that extra time should be removed completely
AIIGUYBNO Posted 5 hours ago #46 Posted 5 hours ago Nope extra time gives the team time to recalibrate and focus penalties are a game of luck
sheriffaz Posted 5 hours ago #48 Posted 5 hours ago "Straight to penalties would be faster, but extra time gives teams one last chance to earn the win on the pitch. I'd keep it as part of the game." ⏱️⚽
Johnaz Posted 5 hours ago #49 Posted 5 hours ago "I'd keep extra time. It tests fitness, tactics, and mental strength in a way penalties never can. Penalties are exciting, but they shouldn't decide every knockout match." ⚽
Featured Comment
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now