Wildmonkeylv Posted August 6, 2019 #1 Posted August 6, 2019 So I will explain why is high risk atleast on Plinko is better than low or medium risk. the downside of low risk/medium: your not able to hit more than the max multiplier,so if you get a good ticket,you basically wasted it on the 5.6-110x,meanwhile on high risk you could of hit one of the high multipliers. You could easily break even on High risk 16 rows if you place over 50 bets,if you dont hit a high multiplier,I dont see the point going on low risk if you have just 0.18% to double your money,while on high risk you would get 26x,I only play high risk on Plinko,because I dont see the point risking the bet on a 0.3-1.5x,while on High risk you have the potencial to hit a 2-1000x. Scared money don't make no money,if you gamble you always need to go for the high multiplier in my opinion,its ofcourse if you came to double your money or you came to have fun and possibly go out with a lot more . Yesterday I managed to hit 3x1000 x,went from 0.02 $ to 1 ETH at the end ripped it all but had fun,it just shows how much you could make from nothing (the 2 cents was from rain) . I would wish to see atleast a 2500x or higher x added to Plinko I would enjoy playing Plinko way more. Questions for you: Why are you playing on low/medium risk ? What do you think about Plinko,and would you want the site to add a higher multiplier on Plinko ? Have you ever won on one of the big multipliers and if so how much roles aproximately it took for you? Have you ever done a long Plinko run,if you have any good stories? I almost basically hit the first two 1000 x's back to back,it was a 200 role span.
nopjegang Posted August 6, 2019 #2 Posted August 6, 2019 Hm i don’t play plinko much because i always lose there on every risk and it should be a better idea to add some higher multipliers like 2.5kx and 5kx maybe so you got a 1kx etc to get easier. And no i didnt win good or had a good run on plinko
SLFJ Posted August 6, 2019 #3 Posted August 6, 2019 Yeah, I think you're right because it only changes the multipliers and if it hits on the biggest one but it will be low or medium risk you will regret it and think about why you, didn't choose the high multiplier. Kind regards, slfj.
kaleemmalik071 Posted August 6, 2019 #4 Posted August 6, 2019 Hi greetings ! well good discussion let me answer your questions 3 hours ago, Wildmonkeylv said: Questions for you: Why are you playing on low/medium risk ? i play low risk if i am in wagering mode i play medium if i am in pre roll mode and i play high risk if i wanna hit something good 3 hours ago, Wildmonkeylv said: What do you think about Plinko,and would you want the site to add a higher multiplier on Plinko ? yeah that's a nice question man yes we need at least 5000 x payout or 10,000 x it 'll be more fun to have it on plinko 3 hours ago, Wildmonkeylv said: Have you ever won on one of the big multipliers and if so how much roles aproximately it took for you? yes i won 1000 x many times but i like to play at 15 pins or 14 pins
barbaris Posted August 6, 2019 #5 Posted August 6, 2019 I would not say that this is a good strategy. Everyone is lucky in different ways and the x1000 is not an easy task. For example, for all the time I never managed to hit the x1000 even once, but hunting for it repeatedly devastated my balance.
Wildmonkeylv Posted August 6, 2019 Author #6 Posted August 6, 2019 Just now, barbaris said: I would not say that this is a good strategy. Everyone is lucky in different ways and the x1000 is not an easy task. For example, for all the time I never managed to hit the x1000 even once, but hunting for it repeatedly devastated my balance. Its not a stratgy,im saying that why play low/medium risk if you can play High and strech your luck.
Menang Posted August 6, 2019 #7 Posted August 6, 2019 People ussually play in low medium risk just to get wager amount (race). But if they looking for profit they should use high risk. But even both low medium and high risk can lead to bust if we unlucky
nuuuitsjdragon Posted August 6, 2019 #8 Posted August 6, 2019 3 hours ago, Wildmonkeylv said: So I will explain why is high risk atleast on Plinko is better than low or medium risk. the downside of low risk/medium: your not able to hit more than the max multiplier,so if you get a good ticket,you basically wasted it on the 5.6-110x,meanwhile on high risk you could of hit one of the high multipliers. You could easily break even on High risk 16 rows if you place over 50 bets,if you dont hit a high multiplier,I dont see the point going on low risk if you have just 0.18% to double your money,while on high risk you would get 26x,I only play high risk on Plinko,because I dont see the point risking the bet on a 0.3-1.5x,while on High risk you have the potencial to hit a 2-1000x. Scared money don't make no money,if you gamble you always need to go for the high multiplier in my opinion,its ofcourse if you came to double your money or you came to have fun and possibly go out with a lot more . Yesterday I managed to hit 3x1000 x,went from 0.02 $ to 1 ETH at the end ripped it all but had fun,it just shows how much you could make from nothing (the 2 cents was from rain) . I would wish to see atleast a 2500x or higher x added to Plinko I would enjoy playing Plinko way more. Questions for you: Why are you playing on low/medium risk ? What do you think about Plinko,and would you want the site to add a higher multiplier on Plinko ? Have you ever won on one of the big multipliers and if so how much roles aproximately it took for you? Have you ever done a long Plinko run,if you have any good stories? I almost basically hit the first two 1000 x's back to back,it was a 200 role span. That is very lucky of you to hit 3x 1,000x in such a short span. The problem with that is you really have had good sessions so far and it shouldn’t continue like that forever... I know the power of Plinko though when it gets on a good run though there’s nothing that can stop that luck! However, on the flip side if you had hit more than 50k rolls without hitting a 1,000x you would be chanting to a different tune lol.
Kinou Posted August 6, 2019 #9 Posted August 6, 2019 I play low risk (8-14 mins, it depends) because I wager more, without lose. When I try high risk, it’s because I chase the 1000x ahah, but never come .
Wildmonkeylv Posted August 6, 2019 Author #10 Posted August 6, 2019 2 minutes ago, nuuuitsjdragon said: That is very lucky of you to hit 3x 1,000x in such a short span. The problem with that is you really have had good sessions so far and it shouldn’t continue like that forever... I know the power of Plinko though when it gets on a good run though there’s nothing that can stop that luck! However, on the flip side if you had hit more than 50k rolls without hitting a 1,000x you would be chanting to a different tune lol. I have always enjoyed gambling more if I have a chance to hit a higher multiplier. If you play low/medium you delete the chance of getting the high ones,I even play high risk for wager aswell,if you play for wager at the end you will bust anyways,why not bust having a chance hitting a 1000x ?
Aazzah Posted August 6, 2019 #11 Posted August 6, 2019 Hey there buddy. I Am only going to be answering two of the questions... but yeah Why are you playing on low/medium risk ? - I Play on medium and high risk sometimes. I play medium most of the time I play this because it is not too risky and it has reasonable multipliers on it. Have you ever won on one of the big multipliers and if so how much roles aproximately it took for you? - I have hit 1000x multiplier 3-4 times. With zero base bet but I won the telegram challenge every single time I have hit it lol! Which is very sick it takes me quite a while to hit a 1000x... Well, the times I hit them it took a while Have a good day!
Brainimaini Posted August 6, 2019 #12 Posted August 6, 2019 I prefer medium risk, X 2, I can’t bet less ... what's the point? rates 1.1 and 1.3 are very risky.
cukup2 Posted August 6, 2019 #13 Posted August 6, 2019 I prefer playing plinko at low risk just to wagerd but to play for profit by using high risk on pin 16 I have not dared because I was still difficult to win when playing there. my victory in plinko with basebet was big enough to only be able to get x130 and so on even lost
Etude Posted August 6, 2019 #14 Posted August 6, 2019 Yes I agree with your evaluation for Plinko on this matter and much so myself that I prefer to play Plinko with the High Risk settings typically on the 420x, 620x and 1000x multipliers.
wngo123 Posted August 6, 2019 #15 Posted August 6, 2019 Quote your not able to hit more than the max multiplier,so if you get a good ticket,you basically wasted it on the 5.6-110x,meanwhile on high risk you could of hit one of the high multipliers. Where you get that idea from? Is it just based on your own observations? I did not hit low multipliers either, but thats because I mostly play on high settings with 16 pins, but the reason is because the multiplier is high not because it’s easier to hit because it’s not. On lower settings it’s the same chance to hit but multiplier is much lower so that’s why I don’t see point in playing it. Quote Why are you playing on low/medium risk ? I don’t and explained my reasons above. Quote What do you think about Plinko,and would you want the site to add a higher multiplier on Plinko ? I absolutely love plinko however adding another high multiplier would be absolutely awesome. They already had 5000x for a while as promotion however it didn’t last long. I wonder if that was too much for them and they began loosing money because of it? In that case it doesn’t have to be 5000x. It could be 2000x On the other hand I’m not sure if this is the good idea. You see if that will make even harder to hit those big multipliers maybe things should stay the way they are. I have more hopes in slots and hope there will be high multipliers. Quote Have you ever won on one of the big multipliers and if so how much roles aproximately it took for you? I won 4 - 6 times (I don’t remember precisely) 1000x and many times 130x. Quote Have you ever done a long Plinko run,if you have any good stories? I almost basically hit the first two 1000 x's back to back,it was a 200 role span. I did long plinko run and it always ended up busting, so I have only short plinko stories I know there are people go hit 1000x two times in the same day. I think it’s totally insanely lucky.
laron Posted August 6, 2019 #16 Posted August 6, 2019 I might if playing in the medium is usually just looking for a wagered course because if it's for looking for profit it seems a bit difficult on low and medium pins, usually pin 16 which I always chase to get profit but I'm not too chasing 1000x payout because maybe what I'm after is profit if my profit is reached usually I will stop whether it's hit at po 10000x or hit at po 130x
CntryBoy Posted August 6, 2019 #17 Posted August 6, 2019 I almost always play high risk only and alternate between 13-16 pins. I agree with your logic for why playing the higher risk is most likely the best. I have hit all of the higher multipliers multiple times, and I hit 1000x 3 times with 24 hours about a month ago, but still looking for my next big hit.
Ddlima02 Posted August 6, 2019 #18 Posted August 6, 2019 Todo mundo tem sorte de guardar as coisas eo x1000 não é uma tarefa fácil. Por exemplo, por todo o tempo eu nunca consegui acertar o x1000 nem uma vez, mas repetidamente devastou o meu equilíbrio.
Tokyo06 Posted August 6, 2019 #19 Posted August 6, 2019 I prefer the low/medium risk because it allows me to wager much more than in hard difficulty.
cryptofly Posted August 6, 2019 #20 Posted August 6, 2019 I do only high when playing Plinko, 16 rows. Why? Because as far as my experience there says, Plinko will bring you much more profits in the long term as the center will always get the balls. So, it doesn`t matter if you are going to be gambling low or medium, the center will take all your balls with your balance. Other games, like KEno, I like it due the great results I have getting while playing with 6,7 and 8 numbers. The only change I do is to switch patterns every good hit or every 3 or 4 (maybe up to 6) reds in a row. Good luck with the high.
Ali saher Posted August 6, 2019 #21 Posted August 6, 2019 I think you say right if you play plinko then high risk better to low or med if you play 💯 roll on low or medium maybe 1,2 you got some good payout like 3x 10x or 20x but if you play on plinko then if you play 💯 rolls and if just 1 your hit go to 130x or 1000x payout you got good profit and I think if you play 100 or 200 rolls must your 3,4 hit to big payout like 26x 130x or 1000 X so in my opinion if you want some good banifit on plinko 16 row high risk better then low or medium risk
kayke94 Posted August 7, 2019 #22 Posted August 7, 2019 when i play i only play high risk with kinda big bets, i dont like to hit something with low bet amount or like when i bet normal then i hit outside on plinko and just facepalm myselves that it could be a huge one
sugam Posted August 7, 2019 #23 Posted August 7, 2019 I just don't play plinko at all ... And I love to play High risk just on Keno .... Plinko kinda sucks for me
Enzo Posted August 7, 2019 #24 Posted August 7, 2019 See i think almost the exact opposite. I've had way more luck with low risk plinko then I have with high risk. It's just easier for me to actually hit things that give me profit. For example: I use Low - 10 pins to wager a lot to get me closer to next star, not focusing on profit. Funnily enough I do most times end up making a tiny bit of profit from doing so. It's interesting but it works quite well, for me.
williamshennie9 Posted August 8, 2019 #25 Posted August 8, 2019 For me, I tend to simply view at as a risk/reward ratio. It is super upsetting to hit an outside pin on plinko low risk, however, if you are destined for a losing streak, then low risk can be better than high risk.
Featured Comment
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.