Not a good game to wager with | My opinion

[sahil777]

yes when ist someone told me its the best game for wagering, i tried and i realize no its not, dice and limbo are far more better than baccarat for wagering, but this game makes me bust like in only 70 to 80 rolls.

[Doge4me]

On 8/29/2019 at 1:38 PM, mhasandx said:

You understood in wrong way dude. Baccarat is the best way to wager in less time than all other game. Like you are losing 2% of your bet. But with other game mode there is a chance that you lose all . its  the best for last 2min of the race. I used it personally. 
But u have to consider how much you are gonna get from race winning after baccarat loss. 
I think you did not calculate that. You try plink 85Min of the whole race. and try baccarat in the last 5min of the race.

so you basically saying that baccarat is good for waggaring in long run straight or you have any strategy to play that?

i also don't have much experience in baccarat tried some times but fucked up badly

[dewun13]

On 8/29/2019 at 1:02 AM, Enzo said:

are pretty confident it'll get them a good place because I don't have the patience/belief to watch it drain my balance like it does.

facts cuz you most likely get 98% of your balance back and sometimes will get 1x but there is not way of making money its purely for wagering.

[neich]

honestly in my opinion baccarat never was a good game for wagering.

i still prefer games like dice, limbo or mines with very low payouts for wagering. the key is to recover early enough and go back to low payout wagering

[Dp10011]

Of all the card games this is the only one I haven't bet. I don't like this game. Not much option or strategy for the player like blackjack.

 

That's why it's on my list of those who don't play here. Lucky everyone trying to profit in this terrible game!

[Dimitris09]

i think is very good to wager in my oponion cuz if you win u get 2x if you tie u can make profit is 8x 

[Rigster]

The majority of games take 1% of your wager, bacarrat takes 1.1%, it's simply, mathmatically worse, however only by 10%

[GKD09]

It really depends on how you play and how much you are willing to lose at max. Also how much of a bankroll you have. 

For me I've never liked Plinko so I tried it a few times and it was horrible. Many other games offer similar strats like low on wheel or low on keno etc which can make you lose less and for small probabilities. However, with baccarat it has been more predictable to me than the others. It's more stable unlike plinko. 

I think I just have a huge hatred towards plinko as well and that's why I'm saying this  

[dkpiiit953]

Hello my friends, I hope you are well and that everything is going well for you.

Baccarat is not a very fun game to play, I advise you to play it only for races or to raise your VIP rank, no more than a x2 payment and I find it very unfortunate. And I think it takes a lot of luck to save the time of a session.

Good luck for the future my friends and good day

 

[Aazzah]

hey, yeah, baccarat is an alright way how to wager but it can eat your balance faster than other wagering game modes. Like, dice 1.01x. that's an alright way to wager for the race. but losing one bet can put you down a lot in profit. 

[Urnut]

i think mines or dice is still the best way to wager alot, u can put the percentage up to 99% which is verry good to wager alot for races/vip level !

[Aiza824]

No, this is the ideal game for wagering. At worst you would only lose one bet after 20 rolls but because it only has 45% chance of occurrence, it gives a fair way to gain a tying streak than trusting a roll with 98% chance of hitting all the time.

[BidaManEris]

Why not? You will lose 1 of your base bet within about 21 rolls (only 20 if there is no tie) which is much better than betting at 1.0102x. The only problem here is the variance-- you will never profit unlike the one that we have on Dice, Limbo or any other games which has a chance to make you ahead.