Snuckle Posted December 6, 2017 #26 Posted December 6, 2017 @brearsI understand where you are coming from but that just isnt possible without faucet and without faucet less people would come and test out the site and with less people testing the site there will be less revenue for Stake.com which means stake owuld have to raise there odds to keep the same amount of cash in there pockets as they had before
Dan Posted December 7, 2017 #27 Posted December 7, 2017 I think its also important to put out there that, increasing minimum withdrawal amount would also provide us with room to increase faucet. But doing so isn't our objective currently. We want to provide more bonus based challenges and incentives, rather than having to constantly manipulate the limits of faucet and withdrawals.
hunter Posted December 7, 2017 #29 Posted December 7, 2017 200k sats for minimum withdrawal is good compare to other sites thats require 300k sats above .
skillex Posted December 8, 2017 #31 Posted December 8, 2017 No, stake also will be in big loss if they lower more of their minimum withdrwal , If ever stake will emplement that then they will also increase their fees its just like as what @kurian said that they are not like charity ,they just provide a provably fair gambling site which is comfortable to everybody well we just be grateful that stake's fee is not killing us . lets say for example like Yolodice, you can withdraw if you reach 50k sats but the fees is killing you also because its 40k ?
Shaniqua Posted December 8, 2017 #32 Posted December 8, 2017 I would have to disagree with you skillex 100 k min with 20k fee is more t han enough when blockchain isnt blasted
Pacman Posted December 8, 2017 #33 Posted December 8, 2017 thats good idea but it will happen when theres no faucet hahaha. 100k minimum is damn cool
Featured Comment
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.