Challenges

[ZangerRinus]

Make the challenges back to what they were!

Challenges always have been 0.000001 btc base and 0.08 btc prizepool.
In terms of the btc at 10k $ period it was $0.01 base for a $800 prizepool.
That means the prizepool is 80.000 times the base bet.

NOW you have to wager $0.05 for a prizepool of $1000 (as non verified).
That means the base bet compared to the prizepool is 20.000 times !!
That's only 25% of what it was before !!

You promise verified users double prizes, but actually that means it's half of what they got in the past.
I don't say you need to raise the prizepool, but bring down the base bet again to $0.01 and the prizepool to $800 (or like $1000 for 300 winners )

The difference between the non-vip and the vip challenge was always around 100 times higher base bet, now it's only 20 times higher, non-vip challenge became a semi-vip challenge now.
 

To give an example:
In the past you had to play with 100 sats and you did get a prize of around 40.000 sats,
Now you have to play with +-150 sats and you get a prize of around 14.000 sats.

[Nenad]

Hey there, ZangerRinus. 

Challenges are there to be changed so the minimum bet and prize pool can be changed on every upcoming challenge. 

But anyway thank you for your suggestion. 

Best regards, Nenad.

[ZangerRinus]

Challenges are there to be changed, I don't say I'm not agree with that.
BUT I think that they should then change in a way which is also fair for the players!
Now we have to risk (wager) more for a way smaller prize (related to the wager).
Also Stake is currently in a growing trend, so more players participate in the challenges,
this means that the prize people will get is even more small.

Like I mentioned in the original message, I don't ask to make incredible prizepools,
I don't mean that that prizes people now get need to be bigger!
The prize people get in USD is more than ok, I think others agree with that aswell.
But personally I think this base bet is too high for the return,
so I just ask to make the base lower and compared too 200 winners the prizepool may even be a bit smaller again.

Also some of the latest challenges have become hard, so if this continues, where will it end?
What's the line of what's a good fairness ratio?
Some examples: 
28 December Mines challenge: a payout of 2163x, if you watch the number of the winners it should say enough. It has a win chance of let's say 0.05%. The win chance of this weeks vip challenge with mines is around 5%. The base amount is a 20 times difference and the win chance 100 times harder.

10 January Keno challenge: 2 times 350x the win chance for one 350x (or more) is around 0,21%. For the last keno vip challenge you did need at least 3 multipliers 9x, 13x and 17x, that are win chances of 2,4%  ,1,3% and 1.21%.