Google Random Generator Use: Raffle Picks

[BettyBits]

Would be nice if Eddie  Would Try This Approach.

1.  Open 20 Incognito Tabs in Chrome (Or how many raffle tickets will be drawn)
2. Enter start number and end number, copying the end number and pasting it into each of the remaining 19 tabs. (this should take maybe 90 seconds to complete)
   a. Can also show you how to save time by creating shortcut so next week  you can load incognito chrome, with 20 new incognito tabs, from a desktop shortcut icon, you can modify 'last number' a single time, within the shortcut link, and it will load chrome with each tab identical having entered the amount of total tickets into each tabs 'last number' box of the form.
3. As you generate each ticket, you can close the tab or remove it from the group and minimize it,  and so on....
4. Waaaa Laaaa

[Stokenut]

Or just, you know, maybe stick with opening 1 tab and clicking the button again?

Muppet

[zzaharris]

because it works well how it is now. Plus that sounds and looks fishy to have literally 20 windows open. And now that I think about it, some might even be consider each window a separate raffle pool with 1 winner each; 20 winners, 1 each from 20 separate pools.

As it is now, all winners are always pulled from the the same pool of numbers with the same instance of RNG; 20 winners, 1 pool. 

[Saphir3]

thats a lot of work for eddie

[dupeddonk]

9 hours ago, BettyBits said:

Would be nice if Eddie  Would Try This Approach.

1.  Open 20 Incognito Tabs in Chrome (Or how many raffle tickets will be drawn)
2. Enter start number and end number, copying the end number and pasting it into each of the remaining 19 tabs. (this should take maybe 90 seconds to complete)
   a. Can also show you how to save time by creating shortcut so next week  you can load incognito chrome, with 20 new incognito tabs, from a desktop shortcut icon, you can modify 'last number' a single time, within the shortcut link, and it will load chrome with each tab identical having entered the amount of total tickets into each tabs 'last number' box of the form.
3. As you generate each ticket, you can close the tab or remove it from the group and minimize it,  and so on....
4. Waaaa Laaaa

It would be nice if you would explain why you think that googles RNG (which I believe uses random.org) has a bias against lower numbers.  Did someone tell you this?  Did you read it somewhere?  Or is it just something you magically 'know' from watching Eddies stream.

[mementomori]

What would be the point of doing that?

[mayetenightz0]

Who knows how to spell hits last bonus drop that was on live stream

[BettyBits]

open up googles RNG page.     and request using say.. between just 1  and 100,000 tickets..   you be the judge.   how many tickets pulled between 1 and 1000   do 100 clicks.   

If you were successful at landing just 1 i would be shocked...  extremely shocked.  

i came close on my run of 100 clicks (approx 5 weeks worth of raffle events @ 20 numbers pulled per week)  
my closest to pretend winning was an 1899 

Yes it maybe asking a lot but refreshing the page after each draw is asking a lot too.  lol
 

[dupeddonk]

14 hours ago, BettyBits said:

open up googles RNG page.     and request using say.. between just 1  and 100,000 tickets..   you be the judge.   how many tickets pulled between 1 and 1000   do 100 clicks.   

So there's a 1% chance each click that the number is between 1 and 1,000.

That means in 100 clicks, there's a 50% chance one or more of the numbers will be between 1 and 1,000.

You would need at least several tens of thousands of clicks to suggest there's any sort of bias against a specific range of numbers.

Just to indulge though, here's my 25th click: