17 bonus buys consecutive - 7 malfunctions - 1 profit of 10 cents

[elyte0nes]

Man you just a degen...Stop with the cry baby shit smh!🤣

 

[dupeddonk]

2 hours ago, Guest Fetacunni said:

The moment I won and changed my bet amount the game went from fair play to ultra scam based on my x130 win.

The outcome is determined when your player seed it set, changing your bet size has no influence on the outcome.

[Guest dacougar92]

On 10/24/2021 at 2:33 AM, elyte0nes said:

Man you just a degen...Stop with the cry baby shit smh!🤣

 

Gotta love the stupid people ready to fall on their sword for stake. God bless.

 

 

[Guest dacougar92]

On 10/24/2021 at 1:37 AM, Guest Fetacunni said:

Yeah it is pure bull shit. Stake has went from great to horrible the past few months. I know exactly the on off switch you are referring to. I won x130 on plinko with a 2 dollar ball, the game then proceeded to land on negative for a consecutive 50+ times draining my balance as i went higher bet. I have the screen shots. The moment I won and changed my bet amount the game went from fair play to ultra scam based on my x130 win. Stake is criminal at this point and I am so mad that people can't see the changes occurring right now.

Yeah man your never going to convince some of these clowns that haven't yet experienced blatant rigging. It's only a matter of time until it affects them and then they will have only themselves to blame for furiously defending these scam artists.

Its actually comical to me how many people are so willing to jump to the defense of stake immediately. I wouldn't be surprised if they are paid plants. Either that or they just aren't smart enough to see what's going on.

 

[dupeddonk]

4 hours ago, Guest dacougar92 said:

Yeah man your never going to convince some of these clowns that haven't yet experienced blatant rigging. It's only a matter of time until it affects them and then they will have only themselves to blame for furiously defending these scam artists.

Its actually comical to me how many people are so willing to jump to the defense of stake immediately. I wouldn't be surprised if they are paid plants. Either that or they just aren't smart enough to see what's going on.

 

Gates is a high volatility game.  That means more losing bets but big wins are bigger.  There's  only a 10-15% chance you'll profit each bet.  Let's call it 15%.  That means there's an 85% chance you won't profit each bet.  .85 ^ 17 = 0.063.  That means each time you bet, there's a 6.3% chance you will not profit that bet and you will also not profit the following 16 bets.

It's unlucky to be on the wrong side of a 6% chance, and who know's maybe Gates is rigged.  But losing 17 in a row proves nothing.  The only thing you're proving is what a baby you are.  You aren't a victim, go get yourself a tissue and stop blaming other people for your own decision to deposit your money into an online casino and gamble it.

[Scav11]

Luck goes both ways, hate to say it but gotta know when to walk

[Guest dacougar92]

1 hour ago, dupeddonk said:

Gates is a high volatility game.  That means more losing bets but big wins are bigger.  There's  only a 10-15% chance you'll profit each bet.  Let's call it 15%.  That means there's an 85% chance you won't profit each bet.  .85 ^ 17 = 0.063.  That means each time you bet, there's a 6.3% chance you will not profit that bet and you will also not profit the following 16 bets.

It's unlucky to be on the wrong side of a 6% chance, and who know's maybe Gates is rigged.  But losing 17 in a row proves nothing.  The only thing you're proving is what a baby you are.  You aren't a victim, go get yourself a tissue and stop blaming other people for your own decision to deposit your money into an online casino and gamble it.

Please cite where you pulled these numbers from if your going to talk shit and do fake math. Additionally your treating each total buy as a regular spin occurrence based on your math - which seems incredibly wrong considering it's the game feature.... Which would be a substantially higher average rate of return. Additionally buying 17 in a row of any game that doesn't pay back is just incredibly fucked.im guessing if our roles were reversed your reaction would be equal to mine. So SMD instead of sucking off eddie

 

 

 

 

[bitblogger]

Just so you know with Pragmatic Play slots, if you tap ur balance while your playing a slot it switches to a "coins" display. As for the errors u dealt with I have no idea what that's about

1 hour ago, Guest dacougar92 said:

Please cite where you pulled these numbers from if your going to talk shit and do fake math. Additionally your treating each total buy as a regular spin occurrence based on your math - which seems incredibly wrong considering it's the game feature.... Which would be a substantially higher average rate of return. Additionally buying 17 in a row of any game that doesn't pay back is just incredibly fucked.im guessing if our roles were reversed your reaction would be equal to mine. So SMD instead of sucking off eddie

 

 

 

 

That's was a bit aggressive..

[dupeddonk]

2 hours ago, Guest dacougar92 said:

Please cite where you pulled these numbers from if your going to talk shit and do fake math.

I was ball parking it after looking at stats from a few players, mainly Syztmz since he plays exclusively bonus buys, and he plays a lot of them.  This is from like a month or two ago:

Quote

 

 "bets": 2146

"game": "pragmatic:GatesOfOlympus",

        "wins": 358,

        "losses": 1784,

        "ties": 4,

        "betAmount": 60.41708181399987,

        "currency": "btc",

 

So he won around 16.6% of his bets.  I'm pretty sure that all of those bets are bonus buys, but I can't say for sure none of them are regular spins - it's possible he did a few normal spins.  And you're right, each regular spin appears to be less likely to return more than you paid than bonus buys, so lets just call it a 20% win rate. 

I'll explain how you can use 'fake math' to calculate winning and losing streak chances using our new 20% figure and your losing streak of 17 (even though you profited one of them). 

Since we're calculating a losing streak, we need to figure out the chance of losing using our chance of winning( 100% - 20% = 80% ) , then convert it to decimal: 80% = 0.8, and then all you have to do is multiply it by itself the same number of times as the streak.  0.8 * 0.8 = 0.64 , so there's a 64% chance you might lose two in a row.  0.8 * 0.8 * 0.8 = 0.512, so there's a 51.2% chance you lose 3 in a row.  This gets repetitive though, the easier way to write it out those last two examples would be 0.8 ^ 2 and 0.8 ^ 3.  (you would say 0.8 'to the second/third power)

You can use a calculator or just type into google '0.8 ^ 17' and voila :

There's a 2.25% chance that you will lose the next bet, and the following 16 bets.

You got unlucky dude.  Get over it.

2 hours ago, bitblogger said:

im guessing if our roles were reversed your reaction would be equal to mine.

not a chance

[Guest dacougar92]

6 hours ago, dupeddonk said:

I was ball parking it after looking at stats from a few players, mainly Syztmz since he plays exclusively bonus buys, and he plays a lot of them.  This is from like a month or two ago:

So he won around 16.6% of his bets.  I'm pretty sure that all of those bets are bonus buys, but I can't say for sure none of them are regular spins - it's possible he did a few normal spins.  And you're right, each regular spin appears to be less likely to return more than you paid than bonus buys, so lets just call it a 20% win rate. 

I'll explain how you can use 'fake math' to calculate winning and losing streak chances using our new 20% figure and your losing streak of 17 (even though you profited one of them). 

Since we're calculating a losing streak, we need to figure out the chance of losing using our chance of winning( 100% - 20% = 80% ) , then convert it to decimal: 80% = 0.8, and then all you have to do is multiply it by itself the same number of times as the streak.  0.8 * 0.8 = 0.64 , so there's a 64% chance you might lose two in a row.  0.8 * 0.8 * 0.8 = 0.512, so there's a 51.2% chance you lose 3 in a row.  This gets repetitive though, the easier way to write it out those last two examples would be 0.8 ^ 2 and 0.8 ^ 3.  (you would say 0.8 'to the second/third power)

You can use a calculator or just type into google '0.8 ^ 17' and voila :

There's a 2.25% chance that you will lose the next bet, and the following 16 bets.

You got unlucky dude.  Get over it.

not a chance

This is is just horrible stats work bro. You feel special after all this? I hope so. Otherwise you did it for nothing. Your not going to convince me anything about this is stats based. If you truly believe that put your money where your mouth is and prove it  out with some buys my guy.simcw you know how the returns will land based on your expert stats analysis.

 

 

 

[dupeddonk]

15 minutes ago, Guest dacougar92 said:

This is is just horrible stats work bro. You feel special after all this? I hope so. Otherwise you did it for nothing. Your not going to convince me anything about this is stats based. If you truly believe that put your money where your mouth is and prove it  out with some buys my guy.simcw you know how the returns will land based on your expert stats analysis.

 

 

 

I already said it's possible the game is rigged.  My only point is the you ranting about losing doesn't prove anything one way ot the other.  You see people crying the same way about games that actually are provably fair.  It's because they lost.

[murali1251]

y i am unable to reply on giveawy