I win million 🤑🤑🤑

[Myefy]

To our Generous Boss, @Edward

I changed my title because no one is intrested... The real title is

Minimum claims

Back then, stake.com had a small player minimum online is 5k and the drop amount every sturday had 3k claims minimum, Now there are too many players over 200k, a minimum of 50k who have made wager, the minimum claim of Drop is still the same... Claims should be increased because there are too many players... its unfair since it runs out immediately.

[Yangels423]

Let's wait for our boss to what he has to say...

[Ck46]

It runs out in less than 20 seconds. 

[jurrus]

Just leave that tg group its pointless, it only seems that they returning some money to community, that money doesnt exists for us average players...

[Myefy]

To our boss @Edward

Please increase minimum claims on stream drop, we hope you base the minimum claims who has wager at least 3/4 of total, a minimum wager of 10,000$ is more than 5000 player and minimum wager 5000$ is more than 10,000 player and minimum 3000$ wager around 20k and minimum claims of stream drop is 3000? You should increase the minimum claims because there are too many players who has wager...

If the wager drop required 10k wager you should put the claims at least 5000 claims, then if the wager required 3k wager you should put more claims...

In choosing drop

You should base on wager req and player...

On 5/21/2024 at 12:23 AM, jurrus said:

Just leave that tg group its pointless, it only seems that they returning some money to community, that money doesnt exists for us average players...

Tg drop is scam

But my concerns is Saturday stream...

[jacksonova]

Why should this happen? Specifically, what law of the universe dictates that this should occur?

My point is that when they created Bonus drops, they were meant to serve some sort of business purpose. If increasing the number of claims to accommodate the greater number of players was something that should happen, then what purpose do you believe they were meant to serve?

For example, if I open a restaurant and I ran a promotion when I first opened, let's say, the first 100 customers after 3PM get a free appetizer. After some time, hypothetically, as business get's better and my restaurant begins to have more customers, it becomes more difficult for customers to be one of the first 100 customers at 3 PM because more people are aware of this promotion and it becomes more competitive. Scarcity is what often increases the value of something. 

So, as it becomes more difficult to be one of the first 100 customers after 3PM, people start to try harder to come get it, they come earlier and make a greater effort to come to the restaurant. Now, let's say people come too late, they don't get it and they're upset. They could either leave or since they're already there, they could just sit down and order anyway. For me, as a business owner, this is how my promotion pays off. It benefits from the people who arrive and spend money because they wanted the free appetizer and for whoever decides to stay who didn't get the free appetizer.

In this example, you might be tempted to feel like I should increase the number of customers who get a free appetizer because now the restaurant is busier and not as many people are getting the free appetizer. But if the purpose of running that promotion was to get customers to come in around 3 PM, which used to be a very slow time for my restaurant, and it's successfully done that, then increasing the number of free appetizers wouldn't serve the purpose of why I created the promotion because then it means that people wouldn't have to try to come in as close to 3PM as possible anymore.

To be sure, I don't disagree with you nor am I saying I am against it. I would love for it to be easier to be one of the few that get a bonus drop. I'm just merely helping you understand a concept that might help you feel less disappointed by the veil of what may be the result of some sense of self-entitlement.