xCeptGG

xCept (US)

xCept (US)

xCept (Stake US)

xCept (US)

xCept (US)

xCept (US)

xCept (US)

xCept (Stake US)

xCept (Stake US)

xCept (Stake US)

xCept (Stake US)

Low risk has its moments, too. It allows you to put out higher play amounts with some amount of cushioning, that would be much more immediately depleted on medium or high. With seven tiles selected on low you only have to hit 3 of them to get your bet amount and then some back. Medium you need 4 and high you need 5. So... Trying to hit something like below on low gives you way more chances than it would if upping the risk. And the end result is still nothing to complain about if you can hit those higher matches.

xCept

The scrolling part of the video is because they pressed space on the keyboard. By default that scrolls one screen downward each time you press it. It is crazy that this issue has not been remedied after all of these months. There should never be a way in the game to accept bets placed just by the user pressing keys on their keyboard.

xCept

No way for any third party service to determine this no matter what any might claim. The ones online just use a basic averaging system but Stake does not disclose what factors truly apply. You can try tracking your own weekly bonuses compared to wins, losses, wagers, deposits and withdraws. Over time you can try to find correlations in that data, but you still won't be able to isolate exactly what weight your losses vs. total wager amount has, so I guess it's probably best to just be sad or happy to see what comes through in the weekly.

I've struck luck on a few originals using what felt like a magical combination of client/server seed. In which I was hitting more high multipliers than the predicted win chance by a reasonable margin and a decent stretch of time. After switching the seeds the play patterns definitely altered and wins diminished. But I see them more like plopping you into a random position of a long series of predetermined outcomes, rather than one having better odds than another. Just as a hypothetical, say you have two seeds with simplified "outcomes" and play the first eight rounds with each. MyBestSeed001 5x 0x 3x 9x 4x 20x 0x 62x 15x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x MyBestSeed002 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 9x 16x 20x 12x 0x 62x 20x 16x If you get the first seed, it may put you right at a spot where there are more wins than losses. If you get the second seed, you may get more losses than wins up front. But in time you'll hit that same sort of streak you did on the other.

Plinko 1K odds: 0.015% Cases 1K odds: 0.0050% So Crates is much less probable to hit the 1K than Plinko, which itself is already much less probable to hit than Limbo or Dice (0.099%). The benefit is potentially getting more smaller wins in Cases to sustain the chase of the big win.

Thank you. Though I do not get any option to report when I click the three dots. Is it because my account is relatively new? I only see the option to "Share" on any post I try.

Just ran across a new user's post where he links to a "dice strategy" that is actually a fake captcha, which if the user follows the instructions will unknowingly install a malicious executable onto their computer. This might be the first forum I ever found that has no "report post" option.

I was down to my final $15 when this game came out. Thought to run it down trying and did a couple $2 spins then switched to $1. At $8 left I hit this one! Which evidently is a 0.005% on Expert so that part amazes me. Later on I realized if I had been playing on Hard that same 0.005% would had gotten me 1000x, or 495x at a 0.01% chance. In general the high multis are much less likely than other originals so you have to hope you win some medium multis to make up for that while chasing the highest ones.

Wise to have a cutoff limit for martingale. In a live game once I ran martingale betting only on player and doubling my loss every round with a $1500 balance and starting with just $5. That was also the time the banker won 22 consecutive times in a row. ☠️ Don't do that. A lot of people do martingale style but with PBPPBB pattern, which has no greater significance than any other of course but if I had done that it would had saved me in that failure. What I have fun with is shuffling a physical deck of cards and flip one card each round, if it is red I bet on player, black I bet on banker. If it's an ace I put $1 on a tie, but still place the main bet too. Whenever my deck pattern fails me I reshuffle the cards and try again. I like this approach because I don't have to think, and do not believe in analyzing patterns because the cards are randomized and each turn acts independent of the last. Betting on banker is theoretically more common, but keep in mind the house keeps 5% of the win there so over time it washes out benefits of sticking to banker. I had a real good run on Grand Bonus Baccarat back in the day when it was a new game. You have to guess correctly 4 times in a row to win a minor bonus, 5 times to win a major. The bonus is built off of 20% added to your bets, multiplied by random values, though I believe they have nerfed those multipliers on round 1 now compared to when I used to play it. Now I see 15x and previously I am pretty sure 20x was the minimum.

xCept

Just tune into the stream or check Telegram later on to see the winners. Eddie picks random numbers from #1 through the total ticket count number and those picks get the win.

My top monthly has always been higher than any other weekly or monthly bonuses received.