jimstonebj

You can play more hands per hour with a the computer than you can a live person. Also with the computer you dont have to worry about people splitting tens all the time.

I think you are better off flat betting than trying to recoup using a martingale strategy. I suppose in the end it depends on you goals. If you are going for VIP then something less volatile might work better. If you are simply trying for short term wins then this is just as good as any.

I've adjusted my strategy to 60% and set a stop loss and stop gain. So far it's performing better for me.

This game is pretty much like a slot machine correct? I don't see a way to incorporate a meaningful strategy. Have you had any success with the game? I'm all losses so far.

I really feel stupid but I can not figure out how to assign values to the chips and actually make a bet. What am I doing wrong?

Over the long run if you are playing using basic strategy I would think the results would be close. I suspect live may feel like it treated you better because one would play fewer hands live.

What is your plinko strategy? I haven't found the thrill with the game - perhaps I simply dont know the correct strategy?

Dice is the first game I started playing on stake. I've slowly ventured to the other games but dice hooked me on stake.

Good well thought out post. I thought you were going to list some of the gambler fallacies but this is actionable and thoughtful. Thank you!

I like the stake originals blackjack but there are instances where I should be allowed to double and can't - this could simply be a rule but I couldn't find anywhere that documented this "feature."

I like the autoplay even if this method didn't score very high for me. This helped me think out of the box.

I spent weeks trying to find the perfect strategy. In the end I settled for starting at 49.5% win chance. Starting with $0.25 as the amount. I set a stop loss of $5 and let it run. I'll have it run multiple sessions depending on the wager target I am shooting for.