Jump to content

Rexit77

Noob
  • Posts

    27
  • Joined

  • Last visited

2 Followers

Recent Profile Visitors

79 profile views

Rexit77's Achievements

  1. Lol game ended already Morocco didn’t play Belgium I don’t think so , if France took Thier chances , they would have been at least 4 goals up
  2. Lol y’all have won the World Cup already chill
  3. I haven’t tried casino before so I don’t even know
  4. Yeah for real they didn’t feel like underdogs yesterday Haha 😅 I know an Mbappe fan when I see one
  5. Unfortunately they couldn’t win but then they won our hearts , kudos to them
  6. I expect it to be an interesting One, let’s see how it goes
  7. Woah that’s huge 😮‍💨
  8. Of course, two heads are better than one . I believe with many opinions, you can filter out the necessary data and make more driven decisions
  9. France came into this tournament as one of the favourites to lift the trophy. They have world-class players, major tournament experience, and the expectation of reaching the final stages. But Morocco have shown, once again, that heart, discipline, and belief can compete with any footballing giant. They have defended brilliantly, played without fear, and proved they belong among the world’s best. So here’s the big question: If Morocco knocks out France tonight, would you call it the biggest upset of this World Cup? Or has Morocco already done enough over recent tournaments to prove they should no longer be considered “underdogs”? At what point does a surprise team stop being a surprise and start being a genuine football powerhouse? Would a Morocco victory be down to France underperforming, or Morocco simply being the better team? Personally, I think football has evolved. The gap between traditional giants and emerging nations is getting smaller every tournament. Maybe it’s time we stop calling teams like Morocco “dark horses” and start treating them as serious contenders. What’s your take? If Morocco wins tonight, is it a historic upset—or just the result of a team that’s finally getting the respect it deserves? 🇲🇦⚽🇫🇷
  10. True , they are well organized and have a decent midfield Oh wow , do you use paid Grok ? Or the free version For real bro especially the Argentina 🇦🇷 vs Egypt 🇪🇬 game . It was something else Yeah last dance for Ronaldo ended in a disappointment unfortunately
  11. Personally for me, I feel like France needs to shoot more , they are definitely creating the chances and dominating, they just need to take them also poor Penalty from Mbappe
  12. I can actually understand why they think that way Thissssss. 📌📌📌📌
  13. The 2026 FIFA World Cup is the first with 48 teams instead of 32, and opinions are still divided. Supporters say it’s great for football because more countries get the chance to compete on the biggest stage. We’ve seen nations make history, passionate fan bases, and a more global tournament than ever before. Critics argue that the expansion has lowered the overall quality, created too many one-sided matches, and made the tournament feel longer than necessary. So, where do you stand? Has the 48-team format made the World Cup better or worse? Would you rather go back to 32 teams? Have the “smaller” nations added excitement, or has it diluted the competition? Should FIFA keep expanding in the future, or is 48 the limit? For me, the expansion has produced some incredible stories, but I’m still undecided on whether it has actually improved the quality of the tournament as a whole. Has FIFA made the right decision, or should the World Cup never have changed? Let’s hear both sides. 🌍🏆 Personally, I feel the 48-team World Cup has given more opportunities for countries that would have never had the chance to participate in a World Cup a shot . But overall , it’s now easier to break records such as highest goal scorer / assist records
  14. When VAR was introduced, the goal was simple: reduce clear refereeing mistakes and make football fairer. Several years later, I’m not sure the debate has settled. Yes, VAR has corrected some obvious errors—offside goals, mistaken identities, and missed penalties. But at the same time, we’ve seen matches stopped for long reviews, controversial handball decisions, and goals ruled out by the smallest of margins. It feels like almost every big match still ends with fans arguing about the referee or VAR. So I’m curious: Has VAR improved football overall? Are the delays taking too much emotion out of celebrating goals? Should only “clear and obvious” mistakes be reviewed? Is the issue VAR itself, or how different leagues and referees apply it? Personally, I think VAR is a great tool, but consistency is still its biggest challenge. The technology isn’t making the decisions—people are. What’s your opinion? If football could keep VAR but change one thing about how it’s used, what would you change? ⚽🔥 Personally I’m asking for more consistency across VAR decisions. For example, the Argentina vs Egypt game yesterday, taking a look at how Egypt’s second goal was ruled out and how Argentina’s third goal was allowed to stand , I believe there was no consistency there because similar scenarios happened there
  15. It’s not easy to correctly predict 10 games in itself bro , kudos 👏👏
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Privacy Policy Terms of Use