Alohahu63

Both Ways are equally the same. It all comes down to money management, bet adjustment and probability for the desired multiplier. Mathematical Edge is out of the question. It comes down to logistics if you like to make some profit. I am using both (high and low multipliers) with individual setups for each of those. That works sometimes better and sometimes not. However in the long run, there is no big difference, except just what you make of it.

I would not play anything which goes near the "martingale". Try to use soft progressions if needed. However, in general, I am not a fan of this double up stuff. It usually buys you time, but will always crash in the long term.

Thanks. Trying to give something back to the community. Maybe I will come up with more information or some strategical views about this game if people are interested. Have fun. 😉

Well, I wonder why people do not use the Primedice version more. It seems that some of the enhanced features of PD need to be better explained....lol I like to use the Primedice version as it gives you more freedom to choose a multi without static values.

Maybe you should read again. This is to let you understand which value is bound to a multi, e.g. 99.91 equals 990x etc. Avid dice players understand what I am talking about. Good question. I have developed a lot of strategies in a couple of years, and some are due to fail instantly, others will help you stay afloat over a long period of time. Consistency could be possible to archive over some time, but you would need to be patient as an elephant as also be aware that house edge will always kick in sooner or later.

Hey y'all, recently I've found an older dice multi/value sheet which some of you may find helpful. It's simple: I have written down all dice values from 194x and up on the roll-over /-under side so you can pinpoint your desired multi with an exact number value. I didn't list multis under 194x since small multis are lazy winners.... lol However, if interested, I may also come up with a strategy or two (no, not the one in a million thing 😁). Don't forget, just gamble for fun. Good luck

Hey there, allow me to introduce some modifications to your strategy, since it got benefits as also flaws, but the flaws are not as big as i thought in the beginning. Considering the fact that most strategies here are pure BS, yours seem to work out somewhat nicely (but i can only speak for myself). First the Results. I have wagered more than 100% of the money which was in use. Of course, I do never use "real money" unless I know a strategy and its behavior well enough. However, you should modify the conditions since the use of "First streak of 1 losses" does not work for the long term, since dice (at least in my case) interprets this command as to use it only once, and not steady. Let me show you in which working order and in what configuration I have used this. Starting with 85% Win Chance. Balance: 1k of any coin/currency equivalent - Starting with 1 unit. Condition 1: Every streak of 1 losses | Increase bet amount 395% (rounded up) Condition 2: Every streak of 1 losses | Set win chance 75% Condition 3: Every streak of 2 losses | Increase bet amount 20.000% Condition 4: Every streak of 2 losses | Set win chance 98% Condition 5: On Greater than 0.0 Profit | Reset bet amount Condition 6: On Greater than 0.0 Profit | Reset win chance In the working order shown above, the game will try to recoup losses as soon as there is a new high profit level. The flaw on this is simple. If there will be a loss on the 20k% area, it will be just down to luck to recoup it, but the benefit seems to be, that this strategy will wager much more than the usual cost expectation. I will attach a pic, so you guys can see it. I cannot say that I recommend this, but with very small money, I would think it's worth a try. It seems to work much better than most strategies here, but beware. I can only talk from what I have experienced. Just check this out for yourself and draw your own conclusions. Good luck.