Jump to content

Royalthreesomee

Noob
  • Posts

    58
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Money
    Royalthreesomee reacted to sykosinatra in Stingy Stake Christmas. What's going on?!   
    Hello everyone,
    Am I the only one feeling really let down by Stake's Christmas events and drops this year?
    Back in 2022-2023, we used to get $5 drops for just $5-7K wagers with drop limits totaling $25000, which felt fair and reachable: 


    Some days, there were 8-10 drops. Now, we're lucky to get 3 or 4, with wagers of $10-25K with mere 10K drop limits - and that wager amount for 5 dollars only! That’s just ridiculous— you might as well put it in the high roller Telegram channel instead.

    The daily challenges are pretty weak too. Across all challenges, we’re barely getting $1-2 while spending 10 times that amount. Plus, we don’t even get the 100% on top of the base reward for verification anymore.
    Overall, this feels really disconnected from the community, and I doubt I’m the only one feeling this way. This can’t be good for keeping players engaged.
    One small improvement is using images for the codes so bots can’t claim them—that’s good, but that’s about it.
    Also, how do you expect us to reach those wager requirements when the RTP is absolutely down the drain? My stats are totally different in 2021-2022 compared to today.
    Just sharing my thought.
    Thank you for reading. 
  2. Money
    Royalthreesomee reacted to midtownsaves in [28 Proofs] Twitter giveaways are not based on luck   
    You are very stupid. There is no such thing as 99% random. It’s either random or it isn’t, and it clearly isn’t.
  3. Money
    Royalthreesomee reacted to midtownsaves in [28 Proofs] Twitter giveaways are not based on luck   
    Wtf are you talking about, and how are you calling people with analytical evidence dumb? Be thankful you’re on the winners whitelist and shut the fuck up. The giveaways are not random, they claim to be. It’s a lie.
  4. Money
    Royalthreesomee reacted to dawid-m in [28 Proofs] Twitter giveaways are not based on luck   
    Finally someone had the time and nervs to analyze this crap... I was a long time ago sure it's rigged ( have seen some names very often too...) , but now it's proofed. Stake goes straight downhill.... 
  5. Money
    Royalthreesomee reacted to GuilhermeSa in [28 Proofs] Twitter giveaways are not based on luck   
    It's bizarre how EVERY draw has at least one person who wins frequently. I analyzed the results of the RANDOM winners announced 8 hours ago and THREE OF THEM together have already won 15 draws.
    - @/Dipesh_Uraon has won 7 times in 13 months







     
    - @/0113sksk has won 5 in 13 months.  





     
    There is a third also @/OvidiuNitu1 who won 3 times in 13 months.


     
    Out of 5 RANDOM winners, 3 have won together, in total, 15 draws to date. Yes, it's a draw based on luck, trust it.
  6. Money
    Royalthreesomee reacted to XeroF in [28 Proofs] Twitter giveaways are not based on luck   
    Everyone with a little brain activity understands Twitter giveaways are rigged.. They let a few new persons win each time to have people saying ive won once! However I dont think its "stake" that rigs them, its just the person handling the Twitter account, that person choose his/her friends first then spread out the remaining wins. 
    If a site dont show how they pic winners they are rigging it. It counts on all sites, its just as simple as that. There is absolutly 0 (ZERO) reason for not showing how they drawn the winners otherwise. But again my personal opinion is that this is not Stake that is rigging them more the person that are twitter responsible  
  7. Money
    Royalthreesomee reacted to GuilhermeSa in [28 Proofs] Twitter giveaways are not based on luck   
    [Counter of frequently winning users: 28]
    [Total sum of giveaways won by 28 people: 136]
    Today I want to prove to you that Stake giveaways on Twitter should not be taken seriously when they inform you that people are chosen at random, implying that we all have equal chances, but in reality it is not quite like that. There are people who are privileged for reasons we don't know.
     **I'm updating with more information about other frequent winners in the comments of this topic.
     
     Many of us know how frustrating it is to stay on Stake's Twitter, interacting and always participating in the "giveaways" they do and the overwhelming majority have NEVER been drawn.
    Of course, there are thousands of people participating in the draws, some tweets with 3, 4 and even 5 thousand responses. There are a lot of people and of course not everyone will win.
     Let's be realistic, our chances are low, but still knowing that it can happen that a person wins once, even twice.  It's acceptable if we do the math.
     However, many of us who follow Stake's Twitter, as well as the announcement of the winners of these draws who are informed that the choice is RANDOM, often see winners who have already won several other times.  This is a bit strange, since there are many people participating and some people even win several times in a short period of time, but how is this possible?

     Let's start with someone I've already mentioned here on the forum before.  He's a stake streamer, 'Diegus Money Maker'.
     Diegus "won" 7 Stake draws in the last 13 months, 6 of them in the last 8 months.  The last 4 draws he "won" were in the last 60 days.  Yes, he "won" 4 times in two months.  (Prints below)
     I opened all the tweets he won, got the number of participants, and got the percentage chance he had of winning each one.  After doing this with the 7 draws, I had these percentages below.

     
     Here are prints of all the draws he would have "won".
     







    Now you might think, "Ah, but that's just a big coincidence. If there's a trillion-fold chance of him achieving this, then it could happen." However, what if I told you that there are other, MANY other people as lucky as Diegus or even more than him?
     I decided to ONLY analyze the last 6 draw results released by Stake. I confess that I didn't think I would find other cases, I thought it would be a waste of time, but I was wrong.
     I FOUND 6 WEIRD and absurd CASES as much as Diegus's!
     In the first one, @/darkmoon11111 won 5 times recently, 4 of them in 45 days.





     
    In the second @/lucas1111x also won 7 times, and in the last 8 months he won 6 times.







     
    Third we have @/maitaibrowneye who has won 4 times in the last 3 and a half months.




     
    Fourth person is @/naoan0405 who won 6 times in 13 months.






     
    Fifth is @/mnhat42 who has won 6 times in the last 12 months.






     
    Lastly we have @/plate15 who won 3 times in 2 and a half months.



     
    These were JUST the last 6 results I analyzed, imagine how many more cases of EXTREMELY lucky people I wouldn't find?
     
     Do you really think this is pure luck? I am not!
    Just one more comment. Of course there are people who win, but the point is that strangely many people win multiple times, some even more than once in a day and this is frustrating for the rest of the community. And the fact that there is no transparency on social media tarnishes the brand's image and opens up gaps for these doubts to fall within the betting site.
     
    Direct links to comments in this thread with other "random" winners:
    +3 https://stakecommunity.com/topic/87157-10-clues-twitter-giveaways-are-not-based-on-luck/?do=findComment&comment=1932068
     
    +4 https://stakecommunity.com/topic/87157-10-clues-twitter-giveaways-are-not-based-on-luck/?do=findComment&comment=1932679
     
    +1 https://stakecommunity.com/topic/87157-14-proofs-twitter-giveaways-are-not-based-on-luck/?do=findComment&comment=1933520
     
    +1 https://stakecommunity.com/topic/87157-15-proofs-twitter-giveaways-are-not-based-on-luck/?do=findComment&comment=1940530
     
    +6 https://stakecommunity.com/topic/87157-16-proofs-twitter-giveaways-are-not-based-on-luck/?do=findComment&comment=1942350
     
    +6 https://stakecommunity.com/topic/87157-22-proofs-twitter-giveaways-are-not-based-on-luck/?do=findComment&comment=1950288
  8. Money
    Royalthreesomee reacted to crisulu in Bonus e-mail   
    I like how this post is getting more attention than anything else.
    It seems that those random big bonuses are the thing that finally woke people up to show that Stake's commercial team turned into shit in the past year.
  9. Money
    Royalthreesomee reacted to Cerebrum in Bonus e-mail   
    Will there come an offical statement of this "Promotion" or will @Eddietell us what happend? Cause there are no requirements or any announcements about.
     
    Also very interesting is that active members get that, like inactive too. 
  10. Money
    Royalthreesomee reacted to Akki77 in Bonus e-mail   
    Well if people start walking over to the comp maybe they will get a E-Mail then...
    This is the second time I witness this from Stake just giving random E-Mails and not explaining it. 
    They will just release Monthly on Monday or Tuesday and no one will talk about this anymore... 
  11. Money
    Royalthreesomee reacted to Leonida1 in Bonus e-mail   
    Stake is getting worse and worse, how could this be the same site as it was couple years ago, even year ago stake was awesome and since then its just going down down hill rapidly
  12. Money
    Royalthreesomee reacted to underdogs in Bonus e-mail   
    didn't fix anything just added 2.5 usd to everyone.  Feel betrayed for staying so loyal and losing so much on stake 
  13. Money
    Royalthreesomee reacted to diegod1 in Bonus e-mail   
    this is part of the 0 transparency policy
    I guess they are targeting good markets for them, but as that would be kinda ugly to others users, they explain nothing and act as that never happened 🤭
  14. Money
    Royalthreesomee reacted to megakarp in Bonus e-mail   
    So, what we know:
    - Accounts from inactive, never deposited before Non-VIPs as well as up to Plat6 accounts
    - Some active players, some inactive
    - Amounts vary from 100 - 3000 usd
    - No strings attached bonus, can be cashed out immediately
    - A day later the same people receive another bonus mail, with a lower bonus, but again - a bonus
    - @Edwardstates he doesn't know the conditions
    - The hosts of P4+ players state they don't know the conditions
     
    So, in short - what a mess. It's not about the fact that some people get a bonus, it's about the fact of total instransparancy. Why do people that have high losses and wager a lot not receive a random 1000 usd bonus while others do? Makes the player disgruntled and angry...
  15. Money
    Royalthreesomee reacted to Rαbαn in Bonus e-mail   
    It's all part of probably fair gameplay on stake
     

  16. Money
    Royalthreesomee reacted to CHIPPER in Chat Rules   
    It is very interesting to be a witness when the rules are violated by the support service managers in the chat, but fellow moderators are silent.  And as soon as the other user decides to write a joke and everyone understands that this is a joke, then the valiant moderator punishes for many days and still allows himself to write rude words about users.  Teach moderators to at least communicate like a human being.  It must be understood that the presence of powers does not mean the presence of a brain. And I'm already silent about double standards.
  17. Money
    Royalthreesomee reacted to ByteMeTwice in Chat Rules   
    Great set of rules.
    If they were even partially enforced they would be even better.
    Stick to enforcing these rules.
    Don't make new rules on the hoof, when you do this, your missing blatant breaches of the rules that already exist.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Privacy Policy Terms of Use