Bolours

Not planning to give up until i get clear explanations

Why support keep ignoring my message ?

Bolours

@MladenS Hello Is it possible to explain me why a post got an ansWer 15 hours ago and not mine ?

Bolours

Still nobody reading that...

Bolours

casino:437539896024

Making a "support" forum with nobody from support reading it

@Vojkan I see you online maybe you can fix that .. 😛

Got Finally some evolution in this case : We apologize if the rules are confusing, however, we are not able to make any changes to the list of the winners nor compensate you as the promotion has already ended. You are free to participate in the future ones, so good luck! Please reach out if you need anything else. Kind regards, So Stake clearly admit mistaking in the rules, and not paying the players who spent money to be on the top. Nice move Stake, totally disrespectful of your loyal players since 2 years. @Jake7589 @JessD26 is that normal ? Someone has to answer to this.

Plat 3, almost 4 and got it like 2 time ?

The funniest thing is i explained all this to the support. They kept saying me "you were not selected" etc ... The last mail they sent me is hilarious Sadly, all available information was already disclosed. Should you have any other questions, we are at your disposal 24/7. Best regards, Luka

casino:436591321168

Hello everyone, I’m posting this to ask for a clear and public explanation regarding the Eggventure / Multiplier Mania challenge. Challenge link: https://stakecommunity.com/topic/160977-💰1000-usd-multiplier-mania-eggventure-🥚/#comment-3162028 My username: Bolours 1. The rule is very clear The promotion rule states: “Rack up as many qualifying 5x (or above) bet IDs as you can. The top 10 users with the most submitted Bet IDs will score a share of $1,000.” This clearly describes a ranking-based challenge: No randomness mentioned No discretionary selection No alternative criteria 2. The issue I am: Listed in the official winners list One of the users who submitted a large number of qualifying Bet IDs However, the same winners list includes users who submitted only one (or very few) Bet IDs, which is not compatible with “top 10 users with the most submitted Bet IDs”. This creates a direct contradiction between: The written rules The actual outcome 3. Support responses so far After more than three weeks and 40+ emails, I have been told: That winners were “randomly selected” That meeting requirements “does not guarantee winning” That I was “not in the Top 10” None of these explanations appear anywhere in the original rules. 4. What I’m asking (publicly) I’m not asking for favors or reinterpretations. I’m asking for one clear answer: 👉 How was “Top 10” calculated if Bet ID volume was not the deciding factor? And if the rule was incorrect or misleading, that should be acknowledged transparently. 5. Final note I have not yet made this issue public outside the forum, but after this amount of time and inconsistent explanations, I believe a public clarification is now necessary. Waiting another week for a clear answer or payment is simply inconceivable given how explicit the rule is. Thank you in advance to the moderators or promotion team for addressing this clearly. — Bolours

@NemanjaPi

Hello everyone, I’m posting this to ask for a clear and public explanation regarding the Eggventure / Multiplier Mania challenge. Challenge link: https://stakecommunity.com/topic/160977-💰1000-usd-multiplier-mania-eggventure-🥚/#comment-3162028 My username: Bolours 1. The rule is very clear The promotion rule states: “Rack up as many qualifying 5x (or above) bet IDs as you can. The top 10 users with the most submitted Bet IDs will score a share of $1,000.” This clearly describes a ranking-based challenge: No randomness mentioned No discretionary selection No alternative criteria 2. The issue I am: Listed in the official winners list One of the users who submitted a large number of qualifying Bet IDs However, the same winners list includes users who submitted only one (or very few) Bet IDs, which is not compatible with “top 10 users with the most submitted Bet IDs”. This creates a direct contradiction between: The written rules The actual outcome 3. Support responses so far After more than three weeks and 40+ emails, I have been told: That winners were “randomly selected” That meeting requirements “does not guarantee winning” That I was “not in the Top 10” None of these explanations appear anywhere in the original rules. 4. What I’m asking (publicly) I’m not asking for favors or reinterpretations. I’m asking for one clear answer: 👉 How was “Top 10” calculated if Bet ID volume was not the deciding factor? And if the rule was incorrect or misleading, that should be acknowledged transparently. 5. Final note I have not yet made this issue public outside the forum, but after this amount of time and inconsistent explanations, I believe a public clarification is now necessary. Waiting another week for a clear answer or payment is simply inconceivable given how explicit the rule is. Thank you in advance to the moderators or promotion team for addressing this clearly. — Bolours

Bolours

casino:434171900174

bolours

bolours

casino:433540759820

casino:433537331595

casino:433517610714