Concupiacent

Dude this an epitome of randomization. With almost every set of data, you’ll have a mean distribution which is around 67.2% or something like that (anyone remember, from statistics 101?). And then you’ll have those that fall outside the mean distribution curve and yes, one or two outliers that do not represent the average results of the data pool in any regard. Diegus is your outlier. I won 4 times in 7 months and haven’t won anything now for 5 months or so. It’s just the way it goes when randomly choosing. You’ll have outliers in the opposite direction as well. It isn’t unreasonable to assume that there WILL be people pwrticipate in every single one of those giveaways, for .us AND .com, for 10 consecutive years without ever winning a single one. That number could be as 20 years even, I imagine. im not trying tO be devils advocate here, but I am saying that it isn’t reasonable to present what is a quintessentially random excerpt of data and expect most people to buy into your opinion in this, which does directly contradicts basic teachings about data sets that have long been presumed as evident as seen from empirical, experimental, and mathematical observations. Ouliers are as real as the ground we walk on.