midtownsaves
-
Posts
44 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Reputation Activity
-
midtownsaves got a reaction from Gamble4fun4 in [28 Proofs] Twitter giveaways are not based on luck
You are very stupid. There is no such thing as 99% random. It’s either random or it isn’t, and it clearly isn’t.
-
midtownsaves got a reaction from Gamble4fun4 in [28 Proofs] Twitter giveaways are not based on luck
Wtf are you talking about, and how are you calling people with analytical evidence dumb? Be thankful you’re on the winners whitelist and shut the fuck up. The giveaways are not random, they claim to be. It’s a lie.
-
midtownsaves got a reaction from Gamble4fun4 in [28 Proofs] Twitter giveaways are not based on luck
Absolutely possible to do random giveaways. I don’t care about not winning, I don’t participate in those giveaways as I know it’s rigged, but why continue to claim it’s ‘random’? The blatant lies really piss me off, it’s so disrespectful.
This is one of the many things they can skirt with their Curacao license. Would never get away with it with a proper license, there are laws when it comes to giveaways.
Well then you, like Diegus the Brazilian clown, are complete morons. Be thankful you’re on the list and don’t be gullible to think you’re that lucky. You’re not. Unless of course you’re seen as lucky for being whitelisted as a frequent stake hand-selected giveaway winner.
-
midtownsaves got a reaction from Gamble4fun4 in [28 Proofs] Twitter giveaways are not based on luck
Respect the investigation but anyone with a brain can see there’s nothing ‘random’ about the giveaways.
-
midtownsaves got a reaction from VWbeetle in [28 Proofs] Twitter giveaways are not based on luck
Respect the investigation but anyone with a brain can see there’s nothing ‘random’ about the giveaways.
-
midtownsaves got a reaction from Royalthreesomee in [28 Proofs] Twitter giveaways are not based on luck
You are very stupid. There is no such thing as 99% random. It’s either random or it isn’t, and it clearly isn’t.
-
midtownsaves got a reaction from Royalthreesomee in [28 Proofs] Twitter giveaways are not based on luck
Wtf are you talking about, and how are you calling people with analytical evidence dumb? Be thankful you’re on the winners whitelist and shut the fuck up. The giveaways are not random, they claim to be. It’s a lie.
-
midtownsaves got a reaction from GuilhermeSa in [28 Proofs] Twitter giveaways are not based on luck
Absolutely possible to do random giveaways. I don’t care about not winning, I don’t participate in those giveaways as I know it’s rigged, but why continue to claim it’s ‘random’? The blatant lies really piss me off, it’s so disrespectful.
This is one of the many things they can skirt with their Curacao license. Would never get away with it with a proper license, there are laws when it comes to giveaways.
Well then you, like Diegus the Brazilian clown, are complete morons. Be thankful you’re on the list and don’t be gullible to think you’re that lucky. You’re not. Unless of course you’re seen as lucky for being whitelisted as a frequent stake hand-selected giveaway winner.
-
midtownsaves reacted to XeroF in [28 Proofs] Twitter giveaways are not based on luck
Everyone with a little brain activity understands Twitter giveaways are rigged.. They let a few new persons win each time to have people saying ive won once! However I dont think its "stake" that rigs them, its just the person handling the Twitter account, that person choose his/her friends first then spread out the remaining wins.
If a site dont show how they pic winners they are rigging it. It counts on all sites, its just as simple as that. There is absolutly 0 (ZERO) reason for not showing how they drawn the winners otherwise. But again my personal opinion is that this is not Stake that is rigging them more the person that are twitter responsible
-
midtownsaves got a reaction from GuilhermeSa in [28 Proofs] Twitter giveaways are not based on luck
Respect the investigation but anyone with a brain can see there’s nothing ‘random’ about the giveaways.