mac254

After withdrawal. You are lucky. I notice it after deposit

Whoa this is scary! They just ban out of the blue with claims that can't be shown, proven, disputed What was the point of directing you to the email for further assistance and then they give the exact same response!! Absolutely disgusting. This means any of us can be kicked out at any time for trumped charges if the "internal team in charge" so decides.

Waart this is wild!!! Both evolution and stake are not responding?

Yeoo Buddy. Through the bombardment here you emerge. Way to go!! Did you get it? Make sure to ge the most of the bonuses and enjoy IRL.

😅 Sorry Buddy. Looks like things have been working out very well in your account in the opposite direction. You vs Stake, the marketing team are reporting results tiltled extremely well. " We love this player so much let us shove his account to the darkest corner. He is amongst our most beloved, coming up very well." What about your host? How is s/he treating you? Perhaps they see bonus emails as overkill for you based on god tier performance by your host.

Huh!? was monthly in doubt? I don't get it 💁‍♂️

French roulette

Ouch. That's mad rinsing. Sorry man. However, the stats are just historical representation of what happened. It doesn't mean that, that MUST happen nor does it influence future results. Otherwise, we would all get the required bank-roll according to our wager and just sit back wait for the number of plays to run and win. In no time Casinos would shut down. Secondly the house has an edge in all games. Which means in the long run the house will always come out ahead. So look at your plays from before the + $ 300K all the way to - $ 210K. The avarage there has evened out. Then account for house edge, you'll see the house should come out ahead, statistically. Lastly, the house develops the code. Whether directly or commissioning a third party. They set the edge i.e rtp. They have all the data. They are there to make profit after settling all the required bills :Paying staff, tax, maintanance, marketing, rakeback, player incentives etc. So they def have all the incentive and motivation to come up with ways to manipulate the gambler to play just a little bit more each time with the hope of winning. Whether through shady or fair means, provable or not, the more they can get the gambler to play, the more chance the house has to win. In the long run the house will always win, mathematically, statistically any way you slice or dice it. Post note. The seed and all individualised markers are just a way to identify persons and check for malnipulation or strange activities. From the game's perspective, it's like 1 gambler playing from multiple accounts. Therefore, when investigating fairness say by the regulator, they will look at each game. Take note of the stated rtp. Ensure it is in line as per the law of the jurisdiction it's in. Then look at the plays. Does it actually pay out as per the rtp or is the code rigged. So if a million players played one game, and the rtp was spread accross the million players or it just went to 1 player, it would't make a difference. That's how one player can play 3 rounds and make thousands and another player plays a thousand rounds and ends up in the negative. But ofcourse the casino has the incentive for the rtp to be spread out to keep as many gamblers on retainer who are hoping to strike it rich one time. They can and do use the individualised data points to ensure as many of their gamblersas possible feel one time is around the corner. The reality though, it's just a mirage, the house can never be beat. And in the off chance you do, they throw you out. It's like playing a football match where the opponent starts 1 goal up and every 5 minutes they are added an additional goal. The opponent also has strong defence and doesn't get tired. You then are able to end the match at any time, but the kicker is the match has no set time limit, you set the time. So you could still win the match, but the odds are stacked in the opponents favour. In the first 20 minutes the opponest is already at 5 goals whether you have managed to score anything or not.

For sure martingale requires a big bankroll. Because whatever amount you start with, even if its cents after a bad run of like 11+ in a row you will be at huge wagers/ many times more than the starting amount and the potential win will only recover losses + the starting wager. You would have been better placed to let it ride once and take your chances. 2. For outcomes that rely heavily on a code / algorithm i.e a code that is desgned, controlled managed and manipulated by the house e.g dice, you can never win with martingale. For all games, they state the rtp. How do they arrive at the rtp? By instructing the developer set it at a certain point. They can just easily have it set to be a money maker for any wagers above a certain point based on the gambler's perceived bankroll. I.e You may have small wins with small wager but the moment the wagers are big or the potential win is significant, the code is already set to win for the house no matter what. 3. Martingale also works only in the short run because of house edge. So no matter what in the long run the house will always win. 4. In the short run martingale can still fail, even if the house is fair, simply because any game is still a game of chance. And once in the short run you fall behind then you are kaput!

Your luck is a little bit 💩. Try sports, 1 game per round

Without conversion fees would be even better. Probably like minimaml cost $ 0.0001 or something. That would be a game changer

Ohh Hadn't known of the new developments. Was this an AML thing?

This was announced that it was being removed

1. Set your limits strictly. e.g What bankroll you playing with. Do not go over!!! 2. Decide the amount/ limit you'll take winnings beforehand. Always quite while ahead especially if you start losing even though you have not reached your target take winnigs amount. 3. Decide what your stop loss limit will be beforhand. A figure is good, or sometimes a round of play i.e If the next round looses or wins you stop no matter what. 4. Then Martingale/ reverse martingale can be useful in the short run. in the Long Run/ long sessions will always end up in losses. - Wait a while after sitting down at a table and just observe to see the flow or pattern. Make sure to have a bankroll and bet sizes to sustain like 8 -12 rounds of bad beats even before you join a table. 5. Hot numbers in the last 50 rounds or less can be a good tell. Be on the look out for the croupier who spins in the same kind of motion, energy, isn't changing wheel direction and use this info for martingale. Use winnigs from martingale to bet on a hot number with like 1/2 neighbours, if it looks like its coming up from the croupier spin patterns. If you had no winnigs after some rounds of martingale just leave immediately! You can use Reverse martingale if you feel pretty confident when you start. If you use reverse martingale & start by winning, leave more or less immediately. Long sessions / long is guaranteed looses 6. Sometimes you don't have to bet straight up. Just take the small wins, stash those untill your bankroll is no longer from your pocket. 7. Then be abosulutely strict with your above rules and limits and you can string multiple samll wins from short sessions over a number of days/ weeks and wrack up thousands.

Stakestat.net

I will give $ 1,000 to the winner

Going for the jugular!! GG

Which channel on telegram?

Whoa. What the actual F! Seems every so often there is something new coming to light painting stake in the absolute worst light. I have heard @Eddiespeak on quite a number of occasions. He highlights transparency, treating especially the people fairly and of priority. I became convinced he is actually a bloke that understands take care of the people and the people will take care of the business. That this is the culture he creates and cultivates in his businesses. So such stories are making me wonder what is going on? Is it the team that's rotten, management mechanisms are failing or what meets the eye is just a facade? Sorry Tavor777 & Jjdjjdjms. You could try escalate the matter even full on legal. Business contracts are serious matters. It's not right for Stake to take advantage or cut corners or use loopholes because the other party operated more on trust, prob missed some critical points/ clauses or something. So if it's because of some bad apples, you will help in the clean up. But if it's bad business practice you will help out everyone in a big way maybe even the industry. So do escalate the matter. I feel you when you have lost out after putting in the grind with high expectations only to be left holding a bag of nothing.

Do you use auto-claim?

Maan this is Really shady!!! Really sus!! - So disgusting!!!! They decide to go out for bots then limit actual users. Then when the user simply asks, is not able to get any information. I mean if its something users are doing that goes against some T&Cs, why not say it clearly -give warning - give options for user to change then move to perm ban if user persists. But temporary limitation, no explanation, no room to rectify if indeed it's user's fault, to an incentive they dangle for the very same users to not only join but also stick around to climb through the ranks. Or actually take responsibility, acknowledge it's in error, make amends. This is insanity!

Whoa this is mad sus!!!! Someone is just removing the competition to claim in more of their alt accounts. So banning people = bot defeat or what is the logic here😑

🤣😂🤣😅 If it were 499 I wouldn't believe

Whoa!! 😀. Just seeing this today. B looking smoking hot!!!

Oh, yeah true