Don’t trust “provably fair” systems.Even the name is a joke "provably" - "probably". No matter how much they try to advertise them as fair, it is all controlled.
If you win, it’s not because you’re lucky, it’s because they allow you to win. You will never come out ahead in these games unless you lose a lot more first. (Just think about the good runs you had on originals, the amount you won and the amount you lost in total before that)
If you still doubt that the system is rigged, try this. The next time you play Originals, run some simulations using AI.
For example, I had a dice strategy. I ran 5,000 simulations of 100,000 rounds each. Around 35% of them completed the full 100,000 rounds without busting. More importantly, in all the simulations that did bust, none of them failed before 50,000 rounds.
Then I tried the exact same strategy on Stake, twice. Same balance, same bet size, same conditions. Both times, the balance was wiped out in under 1,000 rounds.
So, in 5,000 simulated games, none busted before 50,000 rounds, but on Stake, two real runs both busted under 1,000 rounds.
Short AI response was: “Very unlikely, but not impossible.”
And that’s how Stake wins every argument about outcomes. Since everything is “random,” nothing is impossible.Goodbye!
You don’t have to take my word for it. Run your own simulations and compare those results with what you experience on Stake.
Another hint that this is controlled: my balance was dropping unevenly because I was using different USD bet sizes while playing originals. Then I made a bonus buy in ARS on a slot, and the payout, after conversion to usd, brought me exactly back to my starting balance, down to the cent. Considering the slots i played can range anywhere from 1x to 12000x, hitting a result that precise across different currencies is extremely unlikely. Coincidence, maybe, but it happens surprisingly often