Harder Challenges

[JackBoi]

Hey guys!

So what are your thoughts on having harder weekly challenges for the giveaways? I feel like some of them are very easy and doesnt really support the luck of gambling mentality.

Personally, Id like harder challenges with bigger rewards to actually hype up the ones who are lucky enough to get them. 

What are your guys' thought on the matter? Let me know and best of luck!

[Philip74]

Hello, yes I agree it would be nice to have a harder weekly challenge, but to be fair some weeks the challenges can be very hard and sometimes they can be quite easy. Something I have suggested in the past would be a monthly challenge, which would involve doing various challenges on most games. An example would be:

Chartbet: get a 50x and above
Dice: get a 68.1x
Mines: get a particular pattern
Plinko: get a 420x
Baccarat: get 3 ties
Blackjack: get 3 wins with 13 or less in your hand
Hi-Lo: winning hand with 10 consecutive cards or more
Diamond poker: Get a Full house that ties with dealer

At the end of the month a prize could be distributed between all those who get all 8 requirements.

[Kate]

Well the challenges given by them are a 50 50 situation imo. Since one challenge of chartbet to get 100x was hard and annoying but the keno one of 4 tiles was easy

[wry]

I understand your point, but I actually prefer the easier challenges, it is fun to spread the wealth and get people to try new games. 

My concern with the challenges is the number of alts and bogus users who claim them.  I'm guessing that harder challenges would make THAT problem less serious if you are talking about challenges so hard that players will need a whole week to do them.

[JackBoi]

6 hours ago, Philip74 said:

Hello, yes I agree it would be nice to have a harder weekly challenge, but to be fair some weeks the challenges can be very hard and sometimes they can be quite easy. Something I have suggested in the past would be a monthly challenge, which would involve doing various challenges on most games. An example would be:

Chartbet: get a 50x and above
Dice: get a 68.1x
Mines: get a particular pattern
Plinko: get a 420x
Baccarat: get 3 ties
Blackjack: get 3 wins with 13 or less in your hand
Hi-Lo: winning hand with 10 consecutive cards or more
Diamond poker: Get a Full house that ties with dealer

At the end of the month a prize could be distributed between all those who get all 8 requirements.

Yes I really like that idea! Maybe like a bundle of challenges and you need to complete all of those to get a big prize! Very good idea

4 hours ago, wry said:

I understand your point, but I actually prefer the easier challenges, it is fun to spread the wealth and get people to try new games. 

My concern with the challenges is the number of alts and bogus users who claim them.  I'm guessing that harder challenges would make THAT problem less serious if you are talking about challenges so hard that players will need a whole week to do them.

Thats a very good point wry! I feel like with that point allow is enough to add the harder challenges... Just so we dont reward those dumb alts

[allisonn]

I needed like 100 rolls for the keno 4 squares challenge, 5 would kill me 

[AquaViki]

Hard challenge significance changes from player to player. What is hard for you is easy for most and what is easy for you may be hard for others.

So its better is to be more precise like @Philip74. 

[kurian]

I assume that the weekly challenges are to attract more people to Stake casino. If they make it too hard to win then, I don't think it would work as the way it's supposed to be. 

[jkd123]

10 minutes ago, kurian said:

I assume that the weekly challenges are to attract more people to Stake casino. If they make it too hard to win then, I don't think it would work as the way it's supposed to be. 

Yeah I agree, It's a promotion. It's way better then oldest giveaway. I remember oldest giveaway was hardest but there is only top 5 can get reward.

[rd20boy]

isnt it hard already?

[AquaViki]

Busting in roulette betting 12k eth / 1k btc. The challenge may seem easy but if unlcky with the number like me, it will be very hard.

[rd20boy]

yeah we bust before we hit it, haha

[xtinepink]

Actually the weekly challenges already have hard games but they only require small bets so that many people can join. 

I was thinking of maybe they can give back atleast the ranking style giveaway. Likes the one before wherein there’s 1st,2nd,3rd 4th and 5th then consolation prize to all people who participated the giveaway.

That can be a real challenge for them to actually go higher or aim the first place. @Dan

 

[Dan]

3 minutes ago, xtinepink said:

Actually the weekly challenges already have hard games but they only require small bets so that many people can join. 

I was thinking of maybe they can give back atleast the ranking style giveaway. Likes the one before wherein there’s 1st,2nd,3rd 4th and 5th then consolation prize to all people who participated the giveaway.

That can be a real challenge for them to actually go higher or aim the first place. @Dan

 

Whats a fair consolation prize though? We have a budget for how much we can giveaway. The more the places earn the less shared amongst consolation. We want more people playing, the VIP have their own perks they get access to.

[wry]

12 minutes ago, Dan said:

Whats a fair consolation prize though? We have a budget for how much we can giveaway. The more the places earn the less shared amongst consolation. We want more people playing, the VIP have their own perks they get access to.

For what it is worth, I really think the more broadly they are shared the better, so right on @Dan!  The real issue in my mind is the people abusing the system with alts, but that is a different thread.  

[xtinepink]

19 minutes ago, Dan said:

Whats a fair consolation prize though? We have a budget for how much we can giveaway. The more the places earn the less shared amongst consolation. We want more people playing, the VIP have their own perks they get access to.

It’s the same as the present giveaway only it was a little twisted having to add the ranking system. 

Let’s say people who participated were over 50 participants meaning there is .08 btc price. 

.01 or .015 btc can be given or divided to the top 5 participants let’s say

1st place - .004btc

2nd place 0.00250btc

3rd place 0.00175

4th place .00125 and

5th place .001 btc 

then the remaining.07btc are given to people who participated the giveaway. 

[Dan]

2 minutes ago, xtinepink said:

It’s the same as the present giveaway only it was a little twisted having to add the ranking system. 

Let’s say people who participated were over 50 participants meaning there is .08 btc price. 

.01 can be given or divided to the top 5 participants let’s say

1st place - .005btc

2nd place 0.00250btc

3rd place 0.00175

4th place .00125 and

5th place .001 btc 

then the remaining.07btc are given to people who participated the giveaway. 

Taking away for the masses causes the biggest riot. Telling 45 people they have to receive less is louder complaints than telling 5 they have a chance to win more.

[victory8]

17 minutes ago, Dan said:

Quitarle a las masas causa la mayor revuelta. Decir a 45 personas que tienen que recibir menos es una queja más fuerte que decir a 5 que tienen la oportunidad de ganar más.

 

I believe that they have already done well, everyone makes part of the time in striving to meet the challenge. The rules are fine Already if it makes a challenge more VIP is different! I believe that all people have the right to win with equity!

[sichaoeloem]

there really is something that looks easy, but if luck isn't in ourselves, the balance will be drained quickly 

[jualid]

in my opinion it's already good, i think it's better to change the minimum bet from 100 to 1000 sats.

[SovietDoggo]

I think the limited winners thing is cool where there is a 1st 2nd 3rd ect so they get a bigger prize every so often. I'd like racing to get it and if I win it would be more rewarding. I agree with that one all around.

[xtinepink]

6 minutes ago, SovietDoggo said:

I think the limited winners thing is cool where there is a 1st 2nd 3rd ect so they get a bigger prize every so often. I'd like racing to get it and if I win it would be more rewarding. I agree with that one all around.

Yeah. Thanks. I just thought of making it a twist. It’s not that painful for others to take away .01btc and be shared to other 5winners who will achieve the race and totally not a reason for riot hahaha

[AquaViki]

The current format is great. Win some lose most.

The only part that hurts is when you lose a lot and don't qualify. But that is something we have to deal with it ourselves. Because we made the choice of hunting for it.

 

[jualid]

2 hours ago, AquaViki said:

The current format is great. Win some lose most.

The only part that hurts is when you lose a lot and don't qualify. But that is something we have to deal with it ourselves. Because we made the choice of hunting for it.

 

Yeah, that's happen to me. Trying to hunt the roulette challenge and wasted more than 50k satoshi lol. 

[Kate]

On 9/2/2018 at 9:29 AM, allisonn said:

I needed like 100 rolls for the keno 4 squares challenge, 5 would kill me 

Well sometimes you might get it first try like me but challenges are for that but still you get some btc out of the 100 rolls