BTCS Posted April 14, 2025 Author #26 Posted April 14, 2025 8 minutes ago, Mentalplayer said: This is a great post, well structured and written by someone with good understanding of the avg player's frame of reference. Thanks for your feedback , most appreciated , hopefully @Eddie will see this 4 minutes ago, Psegatti said: maybe some good ideas, i think stake already had a own coin but as far as i know its not allowed with their license to create their own stake coin. i know another casino that run into problems because of that. so even if you own a casino you still have a lot of rules and cant do whatever you want to do ... anyway, hope you got the attention from anyone more than only the users of stake and any dev read it, chat lottery would be nice haha Thanks appreciate the comment and yeah lottery seems like a popular one ive suggested 2 minutes ago, steel0777 said: who the fuck can read that long book lolll. @Jjdjjdjms was right. People who actually care about the community and speaking for the whole stake community rather than crying in the chat or making useless comments on the forums , and expecting things to fall on there lap without any effort of thought made ❤️ yolobolo 1
Exile Posted April 14, 2025 #28 Posted April 14, 2025 Great read loved it 😁 Hopefully stake takes into account some of the ideas 💡 provided 💚
ukhatri Posted April 14, 2025 #29 Posted April 14, 2025 im 100% with all things you said. totally support this... yolobolo 1
BTCS Posted April 14, 2025 Author #30 Posted April 14, 2025 23 minutes ago, Lix said: All of these pointers should be added I appreciate your feedback thank you very much 16 minutes ago, Exile said: Great read loved it 😁 Hopefully stake takes into account some of the ideas 💡 provided 💚 Thanks for your feedback, lets hope so. im not a mod but i want to try and be the one who can speak on behalf of the chat and get ideas actually worked on and implemented 6 minutes ago, ukhatri said: im 100% with all things you said. totally support this... Thank you for your feedback , it is most appreciated , its great to see everyone is pushing for the same points ive made yolobolo 1
wenmaxwineddie Posted April 14, 2025 #31 Posted April 14, 2025 I admire the efforts you have put into this. yolobolo 1
zaklock Posted April 14, 2025 #32 Posted April 14, 2025 dont let this distract u from the fact that BTCs is a known scamaz
BTCS Posted April 14, 2025 Author #33 Posted April 14, 2025 38 minutes ago, wenmaxwineddie said: I admire the efforts you have put into this. Thanks for your feedback
BTCS Posted April 14, 2025 Author #35 Posted April 14, 2025 Just now, Krisstyne said: Totally agree Thanks for your comment ❤️ yolobolo 1
carbonium3 Posted April 14, 2025 #36 Posted April 14, 2025 Agreed in general. By the way, us in North American time zones are never going to be waking up en mass at 3-6 AM for Eddie's streams. I'd like to at least see the stream schedule rotated to cover the major time zones so we can participate. yolobolo 1
BTCS Posted April 14, 2025 Author #37 Posted April 14, 2025 1 minute ago, carbonium3 said: Agreed in general. By the way, us in North American time zones are never going to be waking up en mass at 3-6 AM for Eddie's streams. I'd like to at least see the stream schedule rotated to cover the major time zones so we can participate. Thanks for your feedback , most appreciated , hopefully @Eddie will see your comment and look into this also.
Aletimbero21 Posted April 14, 2025 #39 Posted April 14, 2025 12 hours ago, BTCS said: Hello Everyone my name is BTCS Iam here to provide you with some updates that stake has the ability to make. But the question is will they even implement them to stand out as a casino? Stake has always claimed to be the number 1 crypto casino in the world and i feel it is time they lived up to their name and actually took some suggestions seriously. These ideas would not affect stake from a business perspective , but would actually make players feel like there rank they earned means something Chat Room separated into specific ranks or made so you have to be platinum rank to talk and receive rains. This would remove all rain farmers and bots. Receiving rains should be seen as a perk and an award and not just a basic requirement, i think it is pretty obvious to everyone that people have alt accounts and just rain farm, which then actually degrades and disrespects the true players who have wagered more. stake chat lottery funded solely by players directly and at no cost to stake. The way this would work is there would be a stake chat lottery that would drop either hourly or daily. Players who are platinum plus for example would have the ability to add a value amount to the lottery in the chat of which would be at the top of the chat (this would be set do a minimum of $1-$5. When the timer comes to an end on the hour the lottery bot would then randomly select someone or could also be up to 10 people who had contributed to the lottery to win a share in the lottery pot. It is important to note from what i can see there is no reason that stake could not implement this, as unless they started adding amounts themselves randomly to the lottery then this would cost stake as a company no expense and is more community driven. This would inflate chat interaction and also give platinum or higher a perk that no other casino provides based off ranks. Monthly bonus timer and specific date update. Again i think everyone can agree that this is a serious problem come the middle of the month and causes a lot of unneeded spam and misconception amongst the chat. There is no actually reason that stake could not provide everyone on stake the same date each month that monthly is going to be released. Now without naming other sites it is a known fact that they even provide an actual same day and date each month a monthly bonus is released. This makes it evidently clear that other casinos who are trying to compete with stake have picked up on the fact that stake does not provide this to its players and are using it as a footstep to try and tempt stake players to move casinos. This is an update that stake is more than capable of doing if they want to show they are listening to there players Big wins & Lucky wins on slots / stake originals. Ok so we all know that on all slots and stake originals you have the ability to see what players have hit when it comes to multipliers. Now if stake was smart about this then, there should be a simple thing modified within this. If a player wants to be on the high scores then they must have there stake name -unhidden-. There is a reason for this and this is to show the wins are first of genuine and not seen as just being a stake account. Also if a player is on the high scores showing there max win or lucky win , then stake has the ability to allow other players to see the Bet ID of a win so they can see it is a genuine win by a genuine player. Eddie is always on about transparency on stake and this idea falls into that realm and if stake really wanted to show transparency then this is something they would implement without question. Stake coins. The website stake.us get gold coins to help them level there account and i feel a simple adjustment for stake.com to have the same treatment would be a good idea. Currently it is a known fact that stake.com even though it was the first community around when it comes to stake feels as a community that stake.us is treated more favourably then they are. I think it is time that the stake marketing team and Eddie realised that this is actually having a bad impact on stake as a brand but also a company. Given recent world updates that stake coins on .us might not be worth anything now then maybe there should be something players can earn through there wager that can assist them levelling up. Weekly giveaway streams and raffles. Ok so this is quite a big one. We all know that every week Eddie does a stream where he gives away money back to the stream. I feel that there is a much better way to implement the raffles when they are given away to players. First of all when the players are rolled i feel this should be shown on screen and not just showing a random number generator as this in my opinion does not show full transparency to stake users who are hoping for a chance to win. I see no reason why stake cant show the name when it is brought up on eddies screen to tag them in the chat and announce the winner. Secondly when it comes to the amount of times you can win i feel that this should be limited to 1 or 2 times per person. Forget the fact that if someone wants to wager more that they get more tickets or not , because at the very start of this it was about giving back to the players, but evidently it seems to only be people really who have wagered in excess of 100 million or more most of the time. so when you see the same person winning up to 6 times in a row and it is every week , it is pretty obvious that this is going to be boring and stake players are going to feel like what is the point. Weekly discord winners for bonus buys with Eddie on stream This one is much more basic than any other idea on stake that anyone on stake has ever suggested. So we all know that each week everyone joins the discord and picks a room with the hope that there room is going to be randomly rolled by the google random number generator , which is all fine but the problem comes down to when Eddie sends two community moderators or a streamer who Eddie has invited into the stream to go and "pick a random person" from the room that was randomly given. Now i personally have seen the same people being picked every week, i have seen the fact that the moderators tend to only pick females which in itself is kind of lame. so lets have a solution for this shall we. When a room is given by Eddie from the random google generator, the peoples names in that room should be simply screenshot and put into a wheel on eddies stream that would randomly pick a players discord name too win the bonus buy with Eddie for a chance to win big! This would remove the stake community's vision that the picks are biasedly picked and would also show 100% transparency from stakes side and have a positive impact on stake from a user point of view but also attract new players to stake. There is no reason that this can not be done and Eddie had said himself that they need a new way to pick the winners, well there is your answer. I think the fact you have people screaming in a discord begging for a chance to win and be picked is insane, especially when everyone in the world is different and some people clearly have an addiction and some could suffer from mental health, so if you think about it logically if you make it over 100% random then your not going to be seen as having a negative impact on someone's wellbeing. I would like to thank you for reading this post and invite any feedback from other stake users. It is important to note that instead of arguing about the ideas above whether your richer or poorer than the next guy to work together to help make stake a better place as a community, so please try not to argue on this post and cause drama as im trying my best to speak for the majority of the stake chat and try and make stake see that the changes are worth making, not only from a players point of view but also from a view that stake has the ability to make all changes to fulfil transparency. ~~ REGARDS BTCS ~~ Yo pienso lo mismo
Earthshoez Posted April 14, 2025 #40 Posted April 14, 2025 Point #1 Segregating the community based on Rank is not going to fix the issue with Rain farming accounts. The problem here needs to be taken out from root and stem, and that problem is Rain Bot. This bot incinerates millions of dollars annually and distributes it into completely uneven sets of disbursement to the point where you literally have people that are making a living to the tune of $50,000 - $60,000 per year just from farming rain. Some of them are Moderators of their respective channels, so not only are paid from stake either hourly or on a salary, they are double dipping into this as well. Putting aside all of the wasteful conversation that will come from this subject from people on the beneficial side of it standing up for it and people pissed off about uneven distribution of the funds not agreeing with it, it can simply be boiled down into this: There are likely 1000 different ways that the monthly or annual budget for Rain funds could be used to implement new and innovating systems with a goal of equally providing benefits to Stake and its players. Out of respect for Stake Ill also avoid names, but I'd imagine most of us are aware of a Lottery system that is giving players a means to purchase tickets for a weekly draw that is building up to be an astronomical payout while also paying that place for their efforts in creating it. At least a system like this offers everybody a fair opportunity to get something that could be life changing. The problem is the rain bot. People need to let go of their greed over a few fuckin shillings and recognize the potential being sucked out of the website from the money it drains, not sad over the fact that might not win $2 today that they wouldn't have gotten anyway. Segregating the playerbase is never a good idea. And if you think it will rid anything of rain farms or bots you are out of touch with how cheap it is for these people to obtain accounts on the secondary market for a fraction of what it costs the build and wager them up yourself. Accounts up to Plat 4 can be obtained in the low to mid 3 figure range. This action would just further promote people to go about these methods to bypass new barriers. Again, the root cause here is the bot itself. Lottery kinda deal funded by Chat is a fine concept. How successful it might be who knows, or how quickly the main funders of it would become jaded and pissed as they realize they are the workhorses of its funding and the target of peoples anger when they are funded to a point that is deemed insufficient to the people pawing it for a handout -- also who knows. This kind of falls into those "Jackpot" systems we see in other places, where players can opt in and a small amount of every spin or bet, like $0.01 - $0.10 depending on the jackpot in question, is added to a pool of several jackpots that can then be triggered for anybody to win on a random bet, but typically only people that are opted into contribute to these funds are among those eligible to win them, which is fair. This at least gives people the chance to play in or out of it and gives them little room to complain about the system if they don't want to contribute because it just labels as the people looking for handouts rather than wanting to contribute to fair systems. Nothing, not even a timer down to the very second is going to stop some of these obsessive degenerates from obsessing over the monthly. While I don't disagree with the recommendation, I just don't think it would provide much ease of tension from what we currently see. Greedy impatient people will always be greedy and impatient. Big Win and Lucky wins -- The harsh and undeniable truth here is that big winners deserve anonymity if they so choose and people wanting cry that they can't see who the person is need to get over themselves and think about the bigger picture. I've seen low - medium winners here be stalked across multiple social media platforms with lunatics asking them for money. If you didn't make the win you have no right to know who it is, access the bet ID, or otherwise obtain any information about that winner if they to not disclose that information. There are state laws that provide people this privilege in real life and give them the right to claim benefits anonymously for their own protection and while those laws may not directly translate into this online gambling casino world the logic behind their existence should not go unnoticed. Being the holder of a large amount of crypto as seen in some of these incredibly large winnings puts a very real target on you. The blockchain is not at all the anonymous ledger we once thought it was. All you need is one point of entry to track a single payment on every point of it's journey, even if that payment has been disbursed into 100 different wallets after moving from its original destination, this information is all publicly available, there are entire firms dedicated to the business of ripping through these transactions and you best believe there are capable bad actors that also use this information to profile these individuals. It's easy to not realize how serious the protection of this kind of data is, and the liability of that is largely based on Stake to provide a means for these people to opt into that anonymity if they so choose. People have died, had their families target, one guys body was found dismembered inside of a suitcase all because of people targeting them over things that with better effort they never would have known they had in the first place. ---- Fuck stake coins. I dont want that shit here. Since the changes you now require something like 2 million GC to wager to what is equal to 1SC or $1 dollar. But those coins only come into existence because you pay for them. I already pay to gamble when I deposit, Im not about to buy some shitfcoin valued at 2,000,000 : 1 to help me rank up. No thanks I wanna go gamble now. Not a bad post, there are some good points, but some that are also a little silly and being made without fully realizing the reason they exist to begin with. yolobolo 1
BTCS Posted April 14, 2025 Author #41 Posted April 14, 2025 Just now, seba052 said: Genio , te apoyo en un 💯 % Hi thanks for your feedback , please change the comment to English if possible thanks. 6 minutes ago, Aletimbero21 said: Yo pienso lo mismo English please 6 minutes ago, Earthshoez said: Point #1 Segregating the community based on Rank is not going to fix the issue with Rain farming accounts. The problem here needs to be taken out from root and stem, and that problem is Rain Bot. This bot incinerates millions of dollars annually and distributes it into completely uneven sets of disbursement to the point where you literally have people that are making a living to the tune of $50,000 - $60,000 per year just from farming rain. Some of them are Moderators of their respective channels, so not only are paid from stake either hourly or on a salary, they are double dipping into this as well. Putting aside all of the wasteful conversation that will come from this subject from people on the beneficial side of it standing up for it and people pissed off about uneven distribution of the funds not agreeing with it, it can simply be boiled down into this: There are likely 1000 different ways that the monthly or annual budget for Rain funds could be used to implement new and innovating systems with a goal of equally providing benefits to Stake and its players. Out of respect for Stake Ill also avoid names, but I'd imagine most of us are aware of a Lottery system that is giving players a means to purchase tickets for a weekly draw that is building up to be an astronomical payout while also paying that place for their efforts in creating it. At least a system like this offers everybody a fair opportunity to get something that could be life changing. The problem is the rain bot. People need to let go of their greed over a few fuckin shillings and recognize the potential being sucked out of the website from the money it drains, not sad over the fact that might not win $2 today that they wouldn't have gotten anyway. Segregating the playerbase is never a good idea. And if you think it will rid anything of rain farms or bots you are out of touch with how cheap it is for these people to obtain accounts on the secondary market for a fraction of what it costs the build and wager them up yourself. Accounts up to Plat 4 can be obtained in the low to mid 3 figure range. This action would just further promote people to go about these methods to bypass new barriers. Again, the root cause here is the bot itself. Lottery kinda deal funded by Chat is a fine concept. How successful it might be who knows, or how quickly the main funders of it would become jaded and pissed as they realize they are the workhorses of its funding and the target of peoples anger when they are funded to a point that is deemed insufficient to the people pawing it for a handout -- also who knows. This kind of falls into those "Jackpot" systems we see in other places, where players can opt in and a small amount of every spin or bet, like $0.01 - $0.10 depending on the jackpot in question, is added to a pool of several jackpots that can then be triggered for anybody to win on a random bet, but typically only people that are opted into contribute to these funds are among those eligible to win them, which is fair. This at least gives people the chance to play in or out of it and gives them little room to complain about the system if they don't want to contribute because it just labels as the people looking for handouts rather than wanting to contribute to fair systems. Nothing, not even a timer down to the very second is going to stop some of these obsessive degenerates from obsessing over the monthly. While I don't disagree with the recommendation, I just don't think it would provide much ease of tension from what we currently see. Greedy impatient people will always be greedy and impatient. Big Win and Lucky wins -- The harsh and undeniable truth here is that big winners deserve anonymity if they so choose and people wanting cry that they can't see who the person is need to get over themselves and think about the bigger picture. I've seen low - medium winners here be stalked across multiple social media platforms with lunatics asking them for money. If you didn't make the win you have no right to know who it is, access the bet ID, or otherwise obtain any information about that winner if they to not disclose that information. There are state laws that provide people this privilege in real life and give them the right to claim benefits anonymously for their own protection and while those laws may not directly translate into this online gambling casino world the logic behind their existence should not go unnoticed. Being the holder of a large amount of crypto as seen in some of these incredibly large winnings puts a very real target on you. The blockchain is not at all the anonymous ledger we once thought it was. All you need is one point of entry to track a single payment on every point of it's journey, even if that payment has been disbursed into 100 different wallets after moving from its original destination, this information is all publicly available, there are entire firms dedicated to the business of ripping through these transactions and you best believe there are capable bad actors that also use this information to profile these individuals. It's easy to not realize how serious the protection of this kind of data is, and the liability of that is largely based on Stake to provide a means for these people to opt into that anonymity if they so choose. People have died, had their families target, one guys body was found dismembered inside of a suitcase all because of people targeting them over things that with better effort they never would have known they had in the first place. ---- Fuck stake coins. I dont want that shit here. Since the changes you now require something like 2 million GC to wager to what is equal to 1SC or $1 dollar. But those coins only come into existence because you pay for them. I already pay to gamble when I deposit, Im not about to buy some shitfcoin valued at 2,000,000 : 1 to help me rank up. No thanks I wanna go gamble now. Not a bad post, there are some good points, but some that are also a little silly and being made without fully realizing the reason they exist to begin with. Great response thanks yolobolo 1
breakforth Posted April 14, 2025 #42 Posted April 14, 2025 The monthly bonus part is a no brainier, I mean why do you call it monthly if you don't stick to specific dates and just release it at random? yolobolo 1
BTCS Posted April 14, 2025 Author #43 Posted April 14, 2025 Just now, breakforth said: The monthly bonus part is a no brainier, I mean why do you call it monthly if you don't stick to specific dates and just release it at random? Hey thanks for your comment and time to leave some feedback! yolobolo 1
BTCS Posted April 14, 2025 Author #46 Posted April 14, 2025 32 minutes ago, rhix27 said: nice idea anyway Thanks very much 30 minutes ago, venralio said: Agree Thanks for your feedback yolobolo 1
dustinj1990 Posted April 14, 2025 #48 Posted April 14, 2025 Nah ur not the most trustworthy person so imma head out yolobolo 1
Keeggzzz Posted April 14, 2025 #49 Posted April 14, 2025 Wouldve rathered you putting the effort you put into this post into paying me back 😂 yolobolo 1
Xeegs Posted April 14, 2025 #50 Posted April 14, 2025 Crazy how u wrote all that and stake is gonna do nothing lmao
Featured Comment
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now