Lostboyking Posted February 22 #1 Posted February 22 I’ve been looking into the Stake Shield feature on Stake and wanted to share a thought. While Stake Shield offers protection against one or more losing legs in a multi bet, it significantly reduces the maximum payout — even if all selections win. From a mathematical standpoint, this likely lowers the long-term expected value compared to placing a regular multi or simply removing uncertain legs. I understand that the feature is optional and designed to reduce variance, which can help with emotional bankroll swings. However, it would be helpful if Stake provided clearer side-by-side comparisons, such as: Expected value difference vs normal multi Effective house edge comparison A clearer explanation of the long-term trade-off Greater transparency would allow users to make more informed decisions rather than choosing based on emotional risk protection. Curious to hear what others think about the long-term value of this feature. And want to add more " Criticism absolutely can lead to improvement". Regards Lostboyking
Featured Comment
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now