Jump to content

Is Diamond Poker worth playing?


Carollzinha

Featured Comment

Posted

We had a talk about Diamond Poken inside Portuguese chat a few days ago and I could not stop thinking about this since then and some questions came up in my mind:

  • Is Diamond Poker actually worth to play?
  • Can you make some profit out of it?
  • What is the best strategy to play it?
  • What about that 1.5x payout when you have Full House?

Well, if you ask me if it is worth to play I would say yes. Even the maximum payout being only 2x you can still profit from it, no doubt.. I use to play myself (when I am in the mood) with a simple martingale strategy where I will double my previous bet every time I lose a bet.. obviously you will have to do some math and check what's the best bet amount for you as you can easily get 10 reds in a row (I already had 14 reds in a row once) so at the end, if you have a nice balance to cover it, you can end in profit.. but we can't forget that the profit will still be the same amount of your first bet and that's why I find myself it kinda boring to be playing manually and I let the autobet do the hard and boring work for me (lol!). By this point you probably already noticed that some other games can give you a better profit and yes, this is true, but it really deppends in one balance, mood and desire in how to play and which strategy to use. The martingale strategy I mentioned is just one of all the infinite possibilities you can use.

About that 1.5x payout when you hit a Full House, yes I also agree that sucks and it may end up fucking many of your strategies when you hit it after a cold strike and I really wish our Developers would give a look at it.. it doesn't sound fair to me to have a Full House paying less than a pair since the chances for you to hit it are way lower than hitting anything else. I honestly think that it should be paying a minimum of 2.5x instead, it could help to make people pay a bit more attention in such a cool game as Diamond Poker.

Posted

Most of the time when I play diamond poker I end in profit. If you get a loss streak of 8+, then you can increase your bet to make some easy money. Check out this post I made, which you can use diamond poker to make some profit:

 

Posted
15 hours ago, Mobiano said:

i rarely play diamond poker but when i do   i always won  3 streak . what i hate in diamond poker is that 10/10 of games 3-4  is tie !

A thing I learned in all this years playing online games is that a tie is always better than a loss.. think about this lol

As for me what I hate most are these damn Full Houses.. they sucks with their 1.5x payout! >:( 

Posted

I like diamond poker but here's what I don't understand why are the multipliers not differnt  for example why is the payout the same for three of a kind and four of a kind makes no sense.  Also when you get a full house you get less payout!?!?  I don't get it.🤔

Posted
38 minutes ago, bmg said:

I like diamond poker but here's what I don't understand why are the multipliers not differnt  for example why is the payout the same for three of a kind and four of a kind makes no sense.  Also when you get a full house you get less payout!?!?  I don't get it.🤔

The full house pays less due to the 1% house edge. It is the only way Stake can make a profit on Diamond poker.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I actually did makena little profit playing this game while hunting for 4 of kind blues for the giveaway. I just had my bet double in every loss. It did get to a point where my bets ended up big due to the loss streak, but since my bet was small and had a good balance, it actuaally worked out and did not come close to busting which is impressive. Just not very exciting to play and i still dont get how full house pays less than other hands..

Posted

I love diamond poker for some reason. Maybe the simplicity of it. I tend to bust most of the time playing it.

The christmas theme was especially pretty to me also.

I don't like that fh pays 1.5x but it was explained to me that is the house edge. Not sure if that is right though.

Posted

The game seems like a complicated coin flip.  I really don't see the attraction unless you just love 50/50 bets.  Dice is way better with a chance for a bigger payoff.  Also, while I get the lower payoff for the full house it seems so weird to get such a good hand and get paid less.  I'd play Blackjack or Baccarat long before diamond poker.

Posted
19 minutes ago, wry said:

The game seems like a complicated coin flip.  I really don't see the attraction unless you just love 50/50 bets.  Dice is way better with a chance for a bigger payoff.  Also, while I get the lower payoff for the full house it seems so weird to get such a good hand and get paid less.  I'd play Blackjack or Baccarat long before diamond poker.

i agree, i rather play keno too, or other game with higher chance of winning with big multiplier

  • Moderator
Posted

Is Diamond Poker actually worth to play? - no that a booshit game

Can you make some profit out of it? - the truth is im still green with it

What is the best strategy to play it? - probaly is double on lost or x3 or x4 like that but this shit game is very rigged

What about that 1.5x payout when you have Full House? no idea

Posted
4 hours ago, wry said:

The game seems like a complicated coin flip.  I really don't see the attraction unless you just love 50/50 bets.  Dice is way better with a chance for a bigger payoff.  Also, while I get the lower payoff for the full house it seems so weird to get such a good hand and get paid less.  I'd play Blackjack or Baccarat long before diamond poker.

I think it is just the thrill for me. I like to do a variation of martingale on diamond poker, which I describe here. However, I do agree with you, dice 2x offers much better odds due to the lower house edge.

 

Posted
On 12/26/2018 at 11:12 AM, KiXxnTRiXx said:

I actually did makena little profit playing this game while hunting for 4 of kind blues for the giveaway. I just had my bet double in every loss. It did get to a point where my bets ended up big due to the loss streak, but since my bet was small and had a good balance, it actuaally worked out and did not come close to busting which is impressive. Just not very exciting to play and i still dont get how full house pays less than other hands..

A simple martingale (double your last bet) is always a nice idea but we can't forget the long red strike you can have (I personally had 14 reds in a row while trying to catch these 4 blues for the Christmas Challenge) so it can make your base bet increase A LOT.. and that 1.5x payouts at full house can really be an issue when you get it after a long red strike eh? lol

Posted
2 hours ago, Carollzinha said:

A simple martingale (double your last bet) is always a nice idea but we can't forget the long red strike you can have (I personally had 14 reds in a row while trying to catch these 4 blues for the Christmas Challenge) so it can make your base bet increase A LOT.. and that 1.5x payouts at full house can really be an issue when you get it after a long red strike eh? lol

To be honest, if anyone plans to use martingale, not that I recommend it at all, I would suggest using Dice 2x rather than diamond poker, because as you said, you could have 12 losses in a row, and then the next hand is a full house. You will still be in a down position because of the 1.5x payout. However, one way to counter this, is to preroll diamond poker (after hitting the 1.5x), and then after 6 or 7 losses, start with your base bet slightly larger than your net loss, doubling on each subsequent loss. You should have enough balance to cover at least 15 losses :)

Posted

when you double up on your bets and are on a 10 red losing streak and then u get a full house that kinda sucks as u are still on a loser.. thats why i dont really like this game .. 

Posted

It depends on you if you are a type of slots guy then its your game.

Well if you bet big you can have a small multiplier and win big.

There are no strategies in my opinion.

That's kind of lame since full house is rare to get I guess they should replace the multipliers of rare occurences with bigger multipliers.

Posted
18 minutes ago, Kate said:

It depends on you if you are a type of slots guy then its your game.

Well if you bet big you can have a small multiplier and win big.

There are no strategies in my opinion.

That's kind of lame since full house is rare to get I guess they should replace the multipliers of rare occurences with bigger multipliers.

I agree with you, full house should have bigger multiplier than 3 of kind. also every win like 2 of kind 3 of kind 4 of kind and 5 of kind should have different multiplier so its will worth to play this game. 

  • 4 months later...
Posted

DP is worth playing if you considered to go all in that is... is a 50/50 payout whatever you bet you double it ., quick easy simple.. and if you hit a full house you get  1.5 i think,. so a quarter of the payout.. so is better getting a pair for your double pay.. to be honest that's is a bad house edge.. in my opinion

Posted

of course u can make profit form the game, its worth a try..

the 1.5x is there to give the house edge (casino needs to make money too)
if house edge wasnt there then chanc/es to win would have been 50/50 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Privacy Policy Terms of Use