Jump to content

A Twist on Martingale


williamshennie9

Featured Comment

Posted

Hey everyone :)

So I am going to present to you my best strategy that I use on provably fair gambling websites. Just a quick disclaimer, this has caused me to bust several times, but I think it is one of the more effective and profitable strategies.

Here it is - The idea is to get 7 or 8 losses in a row (or more, the less risk you want, the more losses in a row you should have), on a game such as diamond poker, baccarat, or dice 2x, or even mines with a 2x payout. Then once you have incurred those losses (make sure you bet zero when you are prerolling to find that loss streak), then you start betting with your real balance, and I'm taking a decent amount. However, make sure, you have enough balance to survive at least another 8 reds in a row (since you will double on each loss). This can yield great short term profits!

However, use this with caution. The idea, is that with each red, the chance of having another red become lower and lower. So that is why this works. But also remember, you could have 100 reds in a row, over the long term, so you this wisely!

Let me know what you guys think of this technique!

Posted

Interesting way to do a martingale! Prerolling until heavy streaks of reds are over then only do the real money betting never exactly came across my mind. I shall give this a go and prays it bodes well! 😛

Posted

Hmm 🤔 curiosity has me wanting tontry this one out...

but frankly im a littke worries abkut the tie bet part and having so you say enuf balance for doing it rhe way it is presented.

maybe doge is best coin to expeeriment with first before doing seeious balanace 

Posted

The only problem with your theory is that the roll is not affected in any way shape or form by the previous one, the fact that a red appears does not mean that there is a lower chance of a red appearing again it's called the gambler's fallacy and it's very easy he steps into the alluring nature of it

Posted
7 hours ago, zeriko said:

The only problem with your theory is that the roll is not affected in any way shape or form by the previous one, the fact that a red appears does not mean that there is a lower chance of a red appearing again it's called the gambler's fallacy and it's very easy he steps into the alluring nature of it

That's why I always suggest using this with caution. I once got 20 reds in a row on Dice 2x, which caused me to bust using this strategy. However, overall, this strategy has caused me to bust the least and last the longest, while giving me the most profit :)

Posted
1 hour ago, sukillbtc said:

thats actually quite slow, but brilliant! Will try it, thanks :DD

yeah, i actually tried to do  it last night and kind of gave up on it  half way in,
maybe more pa tience is need on my pard. =D

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Any kind of martingale usually gives you great profits if you run well!

I use a slightly different kind without prerolling though which is to up my bet by 1.5 - 2 times if I run well from the start on whichever game... since maximum losing/winning will both occur in streaks, it’s of course highly likely that my best profits ever will be on a run whereby I start winning right from the get-go.

Posted

Seems like an interesting Martingale strategy actually, I might give it a shot to get over of this curiocity even if I really hate everything that has to do with Martingale. Thanks for sharing!!

Posted
13 hours ago, barbaris said:

I will try your strategy, but I think that any strategy will sooner or later face a lack of balance due to your greed and excitement.;)

Greed always causes a person to bust. Always withdraw your profit while you are ahead :)

Posted
On 12/15/2018 at 8:58 AM, williamshennie9 said:

The idea, is that with each red, the chance of having another red become lower and lower

I do not think this is true because the (fair) machine is not interested in the history of your betting. It's also called as Gambling fallacy, especialy Monte Carlo fallacy

You can find detailed explantation at Wikipedia.

Posted

This technique I have already used it several times and it worked .. but if it is that the bot already knows your strategies, which of them are good for an effective profitability?

Cheers...!

Posted
4 hours ago, pfodo said:

I do not think this is true because the (fair) machine is not interested in the history of your betting. It's also called as Gambling fallacy, especialy Monte Carlo fallacy

You can find detailed explantation at Wikipedia.

I do hear what you are saying, and I'll do some reading up on it. But statistically, the odds of getting more reds in a row decreases with red you hit. That is why you never see anyone ever get 40 reds in a row on dice 2x. It is because with each red you get, the odds of getting another decrease.

Posted

Statistically it's true.

Nevertheless if you hit 40/100/xyz reds on dice 2x the probability for next one red/grenn is again 50/50. It's always like the first attempt. 

  • 2 months later...
Posted

You should definitley read up on the gamblers fallacies, atleast when you realize that this doesnt work you can read up on that and understand why. As well as understand how that kind of thinking is also flawed. 

Posted

cool idea just curios in dice 2x you mean are you steak on one side by getting that 20 + reds? you can choose other side or play alternate right? ima not dice player really i just asking :) thanks for sharing this strategy i will try this.

Posted

Any good wins you have had with this strategy yet ? Thanks for the strategy xD Every strategy involves some type martingale in a way i guess. 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Privacy Policy Terms of Use