The Best Playing Strategy

[Xander1022]

These are the simulated strategies that are used:

Strategy A: Bet everything, every time

Bet your entire bankroll on each bet. The advantage is that you get big returns, fast. The downside? As soon as you lose, you’re out of money and out of the game.

Strategy B: Martingale

Bet double your stake after any failed bet, to cover your losses with the next bet’s winnings. This gives a quicker increase than fixed wagers (as you’re doubling up to cover any losses). If you experience sequential losses, however, the required stakes continue to double, and you’ll very soon be betting large amounts to cover your losses.

Strategy C : Fixed wager

Bet a fixed amount for each bet, and don’t vary no matter how much you win. In this example, it was $100. If your chance of winning 55% on a 2.000 bet, this method means you’ve dramatically reduced your chance of losing your entire stake. Unfortunately, it means your winnings are limited to increase in a “slow and steady” fashion.

Strategy D : Proportional betting

Bet a fraction of your bankroll in proportion to your edge. In this simulation, we used the Kelly Criterion formula for proportional sports betting. With this method, your bet should be your edge divided by the odds. In this example, as the edge is 10% and the odds are evens, 10 / 1 is 10.

Therefore 10% of the $1000 wallet should be bet: $100. Should that bet be successful, the next bet would increase to $110, 10% of the new $1100 wallet. This means winnings increase quicker than in the fixed-wager system, and losses slow down.

Strategy E: Fibonacci

Increase your stake in a Fibonacci sequence, to your losses with the next bet’s winnings. This method has similar drawbacks to Martingale method in sports betting, but it reduces how quickly the stake increases if you’re on a losing streak (and therefore also reduces the rate at which you win).

(Source:https://www.pinnacle.com/en/betting-articles/Betting-Strategy/staking-one-method-to-improve-your-betting/2962VHE9W3JPJ7X7)

Below is the profit statistics of each strategy:

[williamshennie9]

16 minutes ago, Xander1022 said:

Strategy B: Martingale

 

I've lost so much money with this. Even if you double your money in the short term, doubling bets on a loss will make you bust in the long run

[KiXxnTRiXx]

lol.. the first one isnt even a strategy.. thats just plainly asking to bust.. You can all in ofcourse and win big.. but betting all in every bet??? that is just plain dumb.. you cant expect to win every bet.. getting two greens in a row has become difficult nowadays... u may win all in a few times.. but you will bust 100 percent guaranteed if you bet like this.. smh.. martingale is a strat that makes more sense.. it could work on almost every game.. the only downfall is when you use this strat for too long.. eventually the system will bust you with its anti martingale algorithym. Fixed bets same as martingale.. it will only work for a period of time and eventually you will hit streams of reds that will eat up your whole balance. Slow or fast, eventually you will bust. The system is programmed to do that. Learn your habits. Betting patterns, when you all in ect. No strat is safe. The best way is to yolo and confuse the system. Break your patterns from time to time and hope when you all in that it will be green.

[CAPT.DEADPOOL]

Im using strategy B because easy to recover my losses but not easy to wining and we having a risky but if you are lucky you got a big profit you don't greedy in betting because you having a chance to loss a lot of money.

[sichaoeloem]

for this year I have not been able to find the best strategy for me to play. 
maybe I will try to strategy D . thank you for sharing 

[cryptjh]

I have never thought about the Fibonacci model in gambling. 

[SuperNova]

Thank you for sharing. I usually play martingale but i bust sometimes. Now i am gonna try D strategy. A is allin thats risky but when you have no time A is best for winning in less time or bust. 

[KiXxnTRiXx]

On 1/17/2019 at 5:48 AM, williamshennie9 said:

I've lost so much money with this. Even if you double your money in the short term, doubling bets on a loss will make you bust in the long run

yuppers, 100%.. it may work for a short time, but in the long run when you reach that long stretch of running reds, you will end up doubling to your doom.. had this happen alot on dice and keno.. ive had good wins using this method, but just as many bad beats as well..

[FotisNt]

As the graph has A as the best option, I do prefer it much more from other strategies while you never know how much ull win. Also martingale would be a huge mistake with a single bankroll like most players have. I would also like to practice Fibonacci while I haven't try it yet. Anyways I suggest you prefering A aswel while you are taking the same risk with the other strategies having even more profits.

[renzu143]

Most of the time i am using strategy B 

[Acetouryahey]

well all the gambling sites i play i always used the Strategy B: Martingale. I lost a lot with this strategy but still ill gain also with this strategy.

[ginoso2019]

 

personally for betting i apply a mix between strategy c and strategy d

[Miya33]

When you are in out of control, all of this strategy will be useless, some gambler git carried away by the emotion especially when thet lose, they chase it and it result more lose

[ceastem]

Looks like strat D is good on the graph. Well it is until stake eats it all up and all the balance intersects at the 0 balance point lol.

Nonetheless, i'll give it a try, hoe it brings more luck to me

[bmg]

My only strategy is to play , have fun and hopefully win lol. 

Good luck everyone.

 

[quartz97]

Strategy B: Martingale, this is effect with sort term betting. but if you rung long term, you must choose another Strategy

[echang426]

Lol, I can't even begin to imagine betting my entire balance everytime to try and get fast profits. My style is closest to proportional betting, where I bet 1/100th of my balance and then adjust when I either drop below half of my original balance or double it. But only on Keno.

[Demarkus89]

I think Martingale works on short game about 5-10 min. if playing for a long time using Martingale will be very difficult because when the long red streak, the Martingale method quickly lost your all balance but it also depends on your balance

[Gijsie]

You have to choose for yourself I change my strats alot during one session...

[Kate]

Strategy A and Strategy B is one of the risky strategies or the riskiest strategies out there and Strategy E is one which is interesting and less risky in my mind i feel so. 

[Bimfo]

I think D is a very good strategy. But this is gambling, anything can happen on the way. You can go fro zero to 1 BTC, and you can go from 10 BTC to nothing. You just have to be lucky. The 1% edge is a big number and a dangerous one.

[FotisNt]

I do actually something like a martingale at 1,11x using auto. 11.1 on both win/loss, 111 as a base bet and stop on 1.0 profit. That works with a bankroll of 3.0 of any coin with a percentage of 80% which is actually way to good to multiplie a deposit once you run it 1 to 3 times. Check this out with doge, I'm sure that you're gonna love it.

[ivaylo2000]

I play with strategy B , but for now it`s not very good. My profit still negative and i didn`t see any light in the end of tunel;.

[ieatkdubsass]

Strat Z; Use a Bible as a mousepad and PRAY dearly while betting that you don't bust because you're gonna need it. After that Pray harder. I call it - PLUG AND PRAY

[Enzo]

Martingale is a straight up fail. Always. Unless your starting bet is 5000 sats and your balance is 5 btc. You're going to lose. (Obviously exaggerating). But realistically, no one makes a lot of money using martingale in the long term.

A core principle on which Stake and any crypto casino are based is that the game is trying to balance constantly the RTP and the Investors EV it wont let either stray too far from the expected returns if the investors EV is up then the game will rebalance in the players favour. If the RTP is too high the game rebalances in the Investors favour that for me is a core aspect on which I play,

Whether its true or not I accept it as true because it helps me win.

Players argue over what is true or not true in the way the game operates. For me the only relevant shared truth is did the game take my money or did I take its money.