strategies.

[Heyodsadsadsa]

Hay!

I always see people talking about strategies, but are there even strategies in gambling? Doesn't it all just depends on luck?
Most famous tactic the martingale tactic. Play on a 50/50 chance to win, if you lose double your bet. This is one of the baddest strategies of all i think, there is house edge so it isn't really 50/50.
On a long time run everyone will lose except the casino.

[Kate]

Well strategies sometimes do work not all odd the strategies but some if them do work and is fun to try toooo busy mostly luck is the main thing needed

[Sped]

Yes, it is basically all about luck, there isn't any strategy thats guaranteed to make you money. Ultimately it comes down to what works for you at that time, and you just have to be lucky enough to be betting on that when it comes around. Having said that, for me I go for 5x on mines and that is my strat, because it works the most for me. I hope you find your lucky strat soon, Good luck friend!

[williamshennie9]

Yes it does depend largely on luck, but a strategy can help optimise your bets and give you the largest chances of actually winning and coming out making a profit. It all depends on luck though, but a strategy can help with that.

[wngo123]

Quote

are there even strategies in gambling? Doesn't it all just depends on luck?

I don't believe in strategies, but I would rather call it the certain plan for game. it doesn't mean it will work, but you have better chance than just playing mindlessly. However playing without thinking at all sometimes work as well..

[Burgerwcheese]

The ultimate aim of gambling is, of course, to win money. Ever since gambling has existed, people have looked to use strategies and systems to improve their chances of doing that. This is basic human nature really. It’s somewhat logical that everyone wants to do whatever they can to win when risking their money, whether that’s on the turn of a card, the roll of a dice, or the result of a horse race.

As a result, there have been many gambling systems and strategies developed over the years. Some of these have become very well-known and followed by gamblers all over the world. The vast majority have never made it in the public domain though. This is largely because most of them don’t work, and those gamblers who do manage to develop winning strategies tend to keep them to themselves.

The Labouchere System

The Labouchere is not for you if you’re looking for a simple progressive betting system. It’s one of the more complicated systems and takes some getting used to. Despite its complexities, however, it is still one of the better known systems and popular among gamblers.

This system is also known by several other names, including the Split Martingale, the Cancellation System and American Progression. It’s a negative progression system, so it involves increasing stakes after losing bets. The main idea is that you should be able to recover the losses from losing wagers with a smaller number of wins.

This is a similar principle to the Martingale, another negative progression system, but the Labouchere does not attempt to recover all previous losses with one single win. Instead, it tries to recover losses with multiple wins.

Because the Labouchere can return a profit through winning less bets than you lose, there are those who believe it works. Indeed, you can make money using this system if you manage to avoid going on a lengthy losing streak. The problem is that there is never any guarantee that you won’t go on a lengthy losing streak. In fact it’s quite likely that you will if you play often enough or for long enough.

By increasing your stakes after every loss, a losing streak can result in the required stake getting too high. You may not have sufficient funds, and even with a huge bankroll there are betting limits to consider. Basically, one way or another there will come a time when you cannot make a bet at the required stake. Reaching this point will almost certainly cost any profits you have ever made previously with the system, and possibly a great deal more too.

The reason some people are tempted by the Labouchere, or any negative progression for that matter, is because they simply don’t think that they will ever lose enough bets in a row to cause a problem. For example, they assume that if they see a red number a few consecutive times at the roulette table then it has to be black soon.

This is not true though. The roulette wheel has no memory and, even it has been red 20 times in a row, the chances of the next number being red are always exactly the same as it being black. The mistaken belief that a black number becomes more likely after several red numbers are spun in a row is known as gambler’s fallacy. This fallacy has led to many gamblers losing substantial sums of money, and you really don’t want to do the same.

The D’Alembert System

The D’Alembert system is one of the simpler betting systems. In terms of its popularity it’s probably second only to the Martingale system. It actually shares some characteristics with the Martingale, as they are both negative progressions that involve increasing stake sizes after a losing bet and decreasing them after a winning bet.

Stakes are increased more slowly with this system than with the Martingale though, making it less likely for the stakes to get ridiculously high. This is an advantage to some extent, however the flipside to this is that losses are recovered more slowly. So the chances of making some kind of loss are actually greater, but the size of any losses are generally less catastrophic when hitting a streak of bad luck.The D’Alembert system is commonly applied when making even money bets at the roulette table, but it can be used for pretty much any even money wager. It’s based on the theory that there should be some equilibrium with even money bets. The idea is that you should always win roughly the same number of even money bets as you lose.

To put it another way, it works on the basis that red would come up approximately the same number of times as black during a session of playing roulette.There is no doubt that the D’Alembert can help you to win money in the short term. You can make a profit even when losing more bets than you win. You need the right sequence of results for this to happen though, and this is where the system is fundamentally flawed. Any sequence is possible, and some sequences can be very costly when using the D’Alembert.

There are a couple of modifications you can make to this system to make it potentially more appealing. For example, you can adjust the stakes by two (or more) units after each bet to help increase your chances of turning a profit when results are alternating reasonably frequently between wins and losses. Of course, the flip side to this is you will lose more if you go on a losing streak.

You can also choose to set a stake level at which you stop increasing the stakes and go back to your base stake and start again. For example, you could decide to never go higher than five times your base stake. This would minimize your losses if you went on a lengthy losing streak, but would also reduce your chances of recovering your losses.

The Martingale System

The Martingale system is one of the oldest and most well-known betting systems in existence. It is also one of the easiest to learn, as there are no complicated calculations involved. The required math is very basic, and there are just a couple of simple steps to follow.

As a negative progression system, the Martingale involves increasing your stakes when you lose. It’s based on the theory that there is a low probability of you losing a large number of bets in a row, and that you will always win one eventually. As sound as this logic might seem, it’s ultimately flawed.

The percentage of gamblers who have tried the Martingale system at one time or another is probably quite high. This is likely to be partly because of its simplicity, and partly because it appears to be a foolproof system at first glance.

Unfortunately, like all other progressive betting systems, this one comes with no guarantee of success. In fact, it is potentially one of the most dangerous systems you can use.

The Martingale system is primarily used at casino games which offer even money bets. The outside bets on the roulette table, such as odd or even, are good examples of where players will try this system. It can also be used on the pass or don’t pass bets at the craps table, and at blackjack and baccarat, and can even be used for even money bets in sports betting.

As an example, let’s say you wanted to use the Martingale system when playing roulette. You decide that you’re going to use a base staking unit of $5, and bet on odd each time. Your first wager would therefore be $5 on the odd numbers. If an odd number came up, you’d keep the stake at $5. If an even number came up, you’d double your stake to $10. If an even number came up again, you’d double your stake again. So you’d be up to $20.

The principle at play here is that by doubling up, when you do eventually win you will win back all your losses and make a profit of a one base unit. 

This system can work in the short-term. It can even work for quite for an extended period of time if you avoid any long losing streaks. However, the problems start when you do go on a losing streak. And, realistically, this is bound to happen at you some point.

The biggest drawback of the Martingale system is that it doesn’t take many losing wagers in a row for the required stakes to get very high. 

The biggest drawback of the Martingale system is that it doesn’t take many losing wagers in a row for the required stakes to get very high. Let’s say you started with $5, and see what would happen to your stakes if you lost just six wagers in a row.

After losing six straight wagers, which is perfectly possible, you are now required to stake $320 for the next one. This is 64 times your base stake, and you’d already have lost $315. You might think that you’re sure to win the next one, but there’s no guarantee at all that you would. It’s still an even money chance, regardless of what’s happened before.

If you did lose the next one, you’d now be $635 down. And you’d have to stake $640 on your next wager. At this point, there’s a good chance you’ll have gone through your entire bankroll. Even if you haven’t, another loss or two could prove to be very expensive. You might even hit the table limit, and be unable to make the required stake.

This is where the Martingale system fails. It’s a perfect system if you have an infinite bankroll and a casino with no maximum stake, but neither of these things are possible. If you use this system long enough, you’ll always end up hitting a point where you have no more money or need to stake more than the table maximum. You can cut your losses and start again, of course, but it’s almost certain that you’ll have wiped any profits.

The Contra D’Alembert System

If you are looking for a betting system that minimizes potential losses and maximizes potential profits at the same time, the Contra D’Alembert is a system worth considering. Very simple to use, this system has long been popular with gamblers. It’s a positive progression betting system, which means your stakes are increased after a winning wager and reduced after a losing wager.

The Contra D’Alembert system is essentially the reverse of the Contra D’Alembert, which is a negative progression system. We provide a few basic details on that system below. Both these systems are best used for the same type of wagers, namely even money wagers in the casino. Technically they can be implemented on any even money wager, but roulette, craps, blackjack or baccarat are the best options.

he theory behind the D’Alembert is that you are more likely to win following a losing wager, and can therefore make more on your winning wagers than you lose on your losing wagers by increasing your stakes when you do lose. This might seem logical, and indeed the system can work with the right sequence of results. However, it is ultimately flawed as a long sequence of losing wagers can get very expensive and cost you your bankroll. Even if you subsequently go on a long winning streak, you are very unlikely to recover your losses in full.

By contrast, a long losing streak using the Contra D’Alembert is likely to be relatively inexpensive. A long winning streak, on the other hand, can be very lucrative.

There are both advantages and disadvantages to using the Contra D’Alembert. We’ve already referred to one advantage, that is not at all complicated and therefore very easy to keep track of what your stakes should be. It’s also a great way to protect your bankroll, as you are not increasing your stakes when you lose. Even if you lose the first ten wagers using this system you will only lose ten units. This compares very favorably to the Martingale system, for example, where you would lose 511 units if you lost ten wagers in a row.

Not only does this system help you lose quite slowly when luck is against you, it also helps you to win big if you go on a long winning streak. By increasing your stakes each time you win, you’ll be winning bigger and bigger sums of money when things are going in your favor. Of course, you have to accept that the chances of this happening are always against in you in the casino because of the house edge. Winning streaks do happen though, and this system does help to take full advantage of them when they do.

One of the bigger problems with this system is that you can lose money if you are winning roughly the same amount of wagers as you are losing. For example, if you went on a sequence of win, lose, win, lose, win, lose then you would be behind. Even though you have won three wagers and lost three wagers, each winning wager of one unit would be followed by a losing wager of two units.

The Fibonacci Betting System

The Fibonacci system is a negative progression betting system, meaning it involves increasing your stakes following a losing wager. The theory is that doing this will help you to win money, as you’re likely to have higher stakes on winning wagers than you are on losing wagers. This principle applies to all negative progression systems.

There are simpler systems than the Fibonacci, but using it is not overly complicated. You just need to learn a few rules about how to adjust your stakes. You also need to be aware of the Fibonacci sequence, a well-known series of numbers that has several uses.

The Fibonacci system is usually used when placing even money bets in the casino. It is commonly used by roulette players on the outside bets, such as red or black, or odd or even. Craps players can use it on the pass or don’t pass wagers. It can also be used playing blackjack or baccarat, or for even money wagers in sports betting.

This system utilizes the Fibonacci sequence, but ignores the zero at the start. You should therefore either try to memorize the sequence or have it written down somewhere.

Before you can put the system into practice you need to decide how much you are going to stake per unit. This can be any amount you choose, but I recommend keeping it small relative to the total amount you have to gamble with. About 2% is a good guideline, and I strongly advise going no higher 5%.

The Fibonacci system does nothing to improve your overall chances of winning in the casino. It can help you win money in the short term, or even over a longer period of time if you manage to keep avoiding a lengthy losing streak, but it is ultimately flawed.

The problem with this system is basically the same as with any other negative progression.
At some point you are likely to go on a long losing streak and the stakes will get too high.

Even though you go back two steps when you win and only go up one when you lose, there is still every chance that the stakes will get so high that you run out of money or hit the maximum bet allowed at the table.

The Reverse Labouchere System

The Reverse Labouchere system is essentially the opposite of the original Labouchere system. The original was developed by the roulette player Henry Labouchere, and it’s a negative progression system that involves increasing stakes after a loss and decreasing them after a win. The idea of that system is that it’s possible to make a profit even if you lose more wagers than you win, since those that you win will be at higher stakes.

You can win small amounts quite frequently with the original Labouchere, but the major flaw is that you can lose a lot of money if you happen to go on a long losing streak. Several consecutive losses can lead to having to bet very high stakes, and this can easily see your bankroll wiped out.

The theory behind the Reverse Labouchere is that you can turn that scenario around. You will lose small amounts frequently, but you have a chance of making a big profit if you go on a run of several consecutive wins.

he real appeal in this system is the fact that the size of your stake can increase quite significantly if you manage to win a few wagers in a row. When you are winning the idea is that you keep on going at higher and higher stakes, hopefully winning enough to wipe out any losses from losing cycles. Of course, there is no guarantee that this will ever happen.

The other appeal is that the amount you can lose in each sequence is capped for each cycle. The total value of all the numbers in your starting sequence is equal to the amount you can lose in one cycle of the system. So with the 1-2-3-4 we looked at earlier, the most you can lose in a cycle is $10

You will have a lot of losing cycles though, as you remove two numbers when you lose and only add one when you win. So the sequence of 1-2-3-4 would be over if you lost the first two bets.

The Reverse Labouchere works to some extent, in that it can return a big profit in the right circumstances. If you hope to use this system to make a profit every time you play you will be disappointed though. Like every other betting system we’re aware of, this comes with no guarantees. In fact, you will probably lose more often than you win. This is because it only takes a few losing wagers to complete a cycle and make a loss.

However, the amount you will lose when you have a losing cycle is limited. On the other hand, the amount you can win if you go on a winning streak is theoretically limited only by the maximum amount the casino will let you stake. If you’re lucky enough to get on a really good winning streak then you could win enough to balance out all the smaller losing cycles and plenty more on top.

Of course you may never go on such a streak and this is why, in all likelihood, you will lose money with this system.

 

[yololife222]

Hey , well not always it depends on luck but it does some times.

I ussually play small betts bigg X on hilo but past 2 days its strange it always rips me, Some times i go all in dice small x

If i dont wanna gamble and i wanna leav it on auto roll i do mines : select 3 bomb/ 5diomonds, on loose increas by 110%. and do small bets  

[Shaniqua]

welll i think it always depends on luck.... ᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎᠎or else ur going into the gamblers fallacy

[rajamishra]

hello friends here so many users express their expertise.i have also one of them we are here for earning not losing some time for our greedy ness we lost all . every strategy can workout but there is some rules.

1. whatever the strategy you used its worked up to the bot not traced your strategy.

2. Every game should be played for small time when you lost upto 10% of your winning stopped there.

3.break within 1000 roll for 30min for next session for puzzled the bot

try it to every strategy hope may be win.

[Shaniqua]

never the less, i cannot say no to someone trying to genuinly help me out! fo.. and for that i tip my had to you ujng sew

 

[barbaris]

Any strategy, whatever it was, sooner or later will lead you to lose. It’s not the strategy, but the ability to stop on time until your greed has taken the whole balance. Luck and self-control are the best strategy.