asharry34 Posted July 11 #2 Posted July 11 Martingale can spiral so fast it’s not even funny, one bad strak and you’re chasing losses you cant afford. I lean toward D’Alembert, feels slower but at least my balance doesnt vanish in 5 spins.
Gauzeick Posted July 11 #3 Posted July 11 I stuck to D'Alembert last month and managed to stretch 50 euros into two hours of play, mainly betting on red.
hollowari Posted July 11 #4 Posted July 11 Martingale always looks neat on paper until the table limit hits you out of nowhere.
runeora687 Posted July 12 #5 Posted July 12 honestly both are just fancy ways to lose slower, but d'alembert at least lets you pretend you have some control for a while
Featured Comment
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now