Craig steve Wright shows up in court today

[rdbase]

He is going to prove to the judge he is Satoshi Nakamoto so he can have ownership of the white paper that the bitcoin founder wrote.

This should be a good one! ;D

[Hoffguy]

lol, well to protect his anonymity and the anonymity of bitcoin, I hope they let him to a video link into the court room!

also hahah, i hope the judge gives him some kind of charge for wasting court time if there is such a thing. 

Gotta hand it to him though, seems like a cool stunt. Thanks for sharing!

[rdbase]

The melodrama of this court case continues.😀

 

[barbaris]

You really believe that he is Satoshi Nakamoto. Something I do not believe in it. Too many people called themselves Nakamoto. One way or another, if he succeeds in proving this in court, then it is probably valid. Or the judges were bought.

[Etude]

Let's see how this drama of his plays out then. What a character huh this guy Craig Steve.

[williamshennie9]

Hmm, strange that this is allowed in a specific country. Surely this should be tested in a court all over the world. What makes a court in the USA so special? My guess would be that Satoshi is from Asia, not the USA.

[rdbase]

The judge is already "wrightly" pissed off at him he said one more time and ..

 

[wry]

He is NOT there to prove he is Satoshi.  He is there because he mined 1.1 million bitcoins with someone else who has now died and his hiers want their half of the BTC.  Craig says he can't give them to him.

This story is worth following because Craig is acting like a moron.  From the news story linked below:

Quote

 

Wright reportedly began to cry during this section of the hearing. He also “crawled into his lawyer’s arms after the testimony and bawled,

 

Not sure what he hope to gain by acting like a small child, but it's another good reason to hope this guy isn't really Satoshi, I would hate to have such a low opinion of Satoshi.

Link:  https://www.coindesk.com/craig-wright-spars-with-kleiman-lawyers-in-combative-courtroom-appearance

[aleksey1826]

When last month there were rumors that the Australian cryptographer Craig Wright (Craig Wright) is going to prove that he created Bitcoin, Gavin Andresen was skeptical. His opinion had weight: Andresen is one of the earliest cryptocurrency programmers, and probably he was the one who more than anyone communicated with Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous Creator of Bitcoin.

[Kate]

Lom this is gonna be a meme when the judge says no as he is about to startand a lot of other good memes gonna comeout of this editors are just waiting for the videos. 

[Etude]

16 hours ago, wry said:

He is NOT there to prove he is Satoshi.  He is there because he mined 1.1 million bitcoins with someone else who has now died and his hiers want their half of the BTC.  Craig says he can't give them to him.

This story is worth following because Craig is acting like a moron.  From the news story linked below:

Not sure what he hope to gain by acting like a small child, but it's another good reason to hope this guy isn't really Satoshi, I would hate to have such a low opinion of Satoshi.

Link:  https://www.coindesk.com/craig-wright-spars-with-kleiman-lawyers-in-combative-courtroom-appearance

Oh that makes sense now wry! Thanks for clarifying it, hmm I would agree that Craig is being such a moron with his behavior.  

[Babagucci]

You know what I think, the founder is probably made up of a couple people and Craig wright had a very small part in the original whitepaper.

Now that the other group members probably died or are in prison, so now Craig is trying to take all the credit for the project while there's no interference.

Why else would someone go through this much trouble. I'm mean if he had absolutely nothing to do with the project, then he is absolutely nuts (literally) for trying this hard to prove otherwise.  It doesn't make sense.

Or maybe he had a falling out with the group and now he's trying to get back at them knowing no one is gonna come forward probably because of the taxes alone they would have to pay on all that Bitcoin. 

But then it's like, ok if your the real Satoshi then why would you just prove some Bitcoin out of the wallet to prove its you, because he doesn't have ownership of that wallet. He the guy that contributed 1% to the entire project. It's the only thing that makes sense.