Etude Posted June 30, 2019 #1 Posted June 30, 2019 Lately I have been often playing Limbo with the payout settings at 1.5x, and it seems to be working well enough until it does not. So often the results falls below the 2x multiplier hence setting it at 1.5x actually gives you abit more cushion. Well if anything below 1.5x occurs then count yourself unlucky in that session then. There is a rather high chance that you could win consecutively up to 10 times in a row even if you get really lucky and also if daring enough, to max bet everytime you win to obtain half the betsize as profit of your max bet size on it. Give this a try if you have not already rather than sticking to the default 2x payout of Limbo.
lolskeffa Posted June 30, 2019 #2 Posted June 30, 2019 That was the setting that i went from .04 to 1.2 eth on doubling my bet after 4 wins in a row although its nice to hit that long shot
bmg Posted June 30, 2019 #3 Posted June 30, 2019 I am not a fan of Limo at all for this very exact reason. I miss chartbet.
nattekut Posted June 30, 2019 #4 Posted June 30, 2019 I can try this out once but I am not that huge of a fan of limbo. I wasn't a fan of chartbet as well. I rather stick to mines, hilo and plinko to waste my money on 🤣
3kpk3 Posted June 30, 2019 #5 Posted June 30, 2019 I would prefer betting on 2x multiplier itself and going all in instead of betting on the 1.5x multiplier that you suggested op since this usually fetches better results for me over time.
HighDamage Posted June 30, 2019 #6 Posted June 30, 2019 Thank you for the strategy, I tried it and the results were quite successful for me. However, sometimes I feel annoyed myself when I get a very large result like 5000x or more. This strategy succeeded in making my balance from 0.003 btc to 0.025 btc slowly
htetaungxx Posted June 30, 2019 #7 Posted June 30, 2019 nice, i already test it. work for me, but when i saw 7000x over i cant control and hunt that till busted greeding kill me too much
Moderator maverick528 Posted June 30, 2019 Moderator #8 Posted June 30, 2019 Its risky if you decide to raise the bet when you get a red. Its similar to playing 1.5X in dice. You can get 10 greens in a row, and that is true, but you can also get several reds together. And, you must multiply your bet by 3 if you want to martingale, and that means the bet amount grows very fast if you get 3 or 4 reds in a row...... I made a long test in this multiplier running it lots of time, and once I got a 10-red long loosing streak, so be warned (10 reds is exceptionally rare, but getting 5 or 6 happens often).
barbaris Posted June 30, 2019 #9 Posted June 30, 2019 I will tell you more. I saw on the multiplier x1.1 a band of eight red ones and I think that this is not the limit. On the multiplier x1.5, I think that there can be a lot more than 10 red in a row, so you have to play carefully.
williamshennie9 Posted July 4, 2019 #10 Posted July 4, 2019 I suppose 1.5x is like a cushion compared to 2x. However, the lower payout allows for lower risk, but the downside is that the amount you win per bet is less. Those pesky 0.99x will still make you lose over the long run.
Philip74 Posted July 4, 2019 #11 Posted July 4, 2019 I tried your method a few times and overall it is quite good, the first day I made some profit, the other times I was break-even. When I get 3 consecutive losses I usually increase the bet, which helps to cover some of the losses.
CntryBoy Posted July 5, 2019 #12 Posted July 5, 2019 I am not a big fan of Limbo, and would much rather play Chartbet if it returns. When I am running bad at other games I will go back to Limbo from time to time though, so I will give this a shot and see how it plays out.
FotisNt Posted July 6, 2019 #13 Posted July 6, 2019 Well, I tried it once, doubled my deposit successfully. Rest times were just some failures while I got massive red streaks and lost each deposit I made. I guess you need luck even in a low multiplier like that.
jualid Posted July 6, 2019 #14 Posted July 6, 2019 Hmm, i never tried this 1.5x multiplier before. I guess i'll try it today, how about the increase on lose? is 200% is fine? and how many long red streak you can got using 1.5x multiplier?
Cryptwalker Posted July 6, 2019 #15 Posted July 6, 2019 i've been setting my payouts to 13x for example: if i had 80-100 XRP, i would start my BB at 0.05 and roll 10-12 times, if it doesn't hit, then i'd double up and roll another 10-12 times and so on and so forth. if i see multiple wins within 2-5 rolls from each other, i'll keep my bb at a higher amount until i see a drought for which then i'll wait till my next win to go back to 0.05... works pretty good. took 80 XRP to 130 in 15-20 of casual no rush betting haha 😁
GKD09 Posted July 6, 2019 #16 Posted July 6, 2019 You seem to suggest this for a few rounds right? Where you are trying to multiply your base bet like twice or thrice and then increasing it to your profit to gain more? If yes, in that case it could work, but in the long run as we all know the red streaks seem to find its ways. Like @barbaris said even at 1.1x there comes so many reds and so the 1.5x easily could have a few more. So in the long run if you're trying a multiplying strat it might be dangerous, but for short runs I may also go ahead and try it
DaDude Posted July 6, 2019 #17 Posted July 6, 2019 On 6/30/2019 at 6:47 AM, bmg said: I am not a fan of Limo at all for this very exact reason. I miss chartbet. what is chartbet? oh is that the old version of limbo lol? btw etude, ill try it out and let you know what happens. 1.5x is strange
FotisNt Posted July 10, 2019 #18 Posted July 10, 2019 On 7/6/2019 at 8:22 AM, DaDude said: what is chartbet? oh is that the old version of limbo lol? btw etude, ill try it out and let you know what happens. 1.5x is strange Chartbet was actually similar to crash, you could stop the multiplier manually. We all kinda prefer chartbet instead of limbo I guess.
Kate Posted July 23, 2019 #19 Posted July 23, 2019 Well if you are having a huge bb then you can easily win with this but if you have like 100 satoshis this is just the worst way to play on limbo i believe so since it will take ages to reach minimum withdrawal.
DoremiCloud Posted July 23, 2019 #20 Posted July 23, 2019 Loving this tip. I'll probably gonna try this one of these days and since I'm new here, I hope my beginner's luck won't run out on me. Thanks again!
SLFJ Posted July 23, 2019 #21 Posted July 23, 2019 Lately I have been often playing Limbo with the payout settings at 1.5x, and it seems to be working well enough until it does not. So often the results falls below the 2x multiplier hence setting it at 1.5x actually gives you abit more cushion. Well if anything below 1.5x occurs then count yourself unlucky in that session then. There is a rather high chance that you could win consecutively up to 10 times in a row even if you get really lucky and also if daring enough, to max bet everytime you win to obtain half the betsize as profit of your max bet size on it. Don't feel like it because you can get many lower multis in a row and just lose all of your balance as quickly.
Enzo Posted July 23, 2019 #22 Posted July 23, 2019 I will give this a try. I played 1.5x in Dice for awhile one time and made 2500 sats to 1.23m sats. Was quite impressive and took quite a lot of time but it took a lot of patience and discipline.
cukup2 Posted July 23, 2019 #23 Posted July 23, 2019 it turns out it's true that the game in Limbo uses the 1.5 payout strategy can be up to 10 in the red, I experienced it while playing limbo with basebet 1.5 and I had to lose all my balance on the same web in my friend. starting this time I will be more careful playing small payout in limbo, for fear that my balance will run out again. thank you for the information dear I am still careless in the game not heeding your warnings.
dkpiiit953 Posted July 24, 2019 #24 Posted July 24, 2019 I find that when I put 1.5 his grave very often below ..
mikidzurinda Posted July 27, 2019 #25 Posted July 27, 2019 Thanks for sharing this idea. Limbo is giving nice, just need to avoid red streak or stop when it looks that it is coming.
Featured Comment
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.