Do you think the Lower Pins are worth playing?

[Etude]

Hey everyone! Do you all think that the lower pins with low risk for Plinko are actually worth playing at all? e.g. ( Low risk, 8 pins gives a highest multiplier of 5.6 while the worst multiplier is a 0.5 right down the middle ) and so forth. 

For me I was tend to go for the Highest Risk setting for Plinko while also only play with pins of above 12 which has a 170x in there at the very least.

So what are you inputs on this, Plinko lovers?

[Paecga129]

Yes I def do.   I have some really well playing higher amounts on lower pin on medium.   It’s a slow build up but it is def worth it ! 

[Etude]

1 minute ago, Paecga129 said:

Yes I def do.   I have some really well playing higher amounts on lower pin on medium.   It’s a slow build up but it is def worth it ! 

Oh I see that is good to hear from those who indeed do like to play them.  

[artizykristy]

nap in my opinion this is a way of playing that does not provide profit yet again if we are not lucky the losses we get are certainly very much. but if you only want to find a wager, this pin is pretty good at that

[jkd123]

Never win on low pin and low risk. But it's still good if you want to wager here.

[Etude]

8 minutes ago, jkd123 said:

Never win on low pin and low risk. But it's still good if you want to wager here.

Ah yes that is true that the low pins settings for Plinko is actually quite decent for the purpose of solely wagering.

[Enzo]

I've honestly never played the lower setting of plinko. But seeing as I have NEVER hit a 1000x/620x/420x/ or anything that high on plinko, I should try the lower pins.

[77kdub]

I use to be dead set on 16 pins high but recently I decided to experiment with trying a lower pin setting.  I do always play on the High setting but surprisingly the 8 pin setting has worked very well to build my balance,  then I switch to 16 pin.  

[ivaylo2000]

 

Depending on the small pins, there is a higher chance of a winning bet.

But the profit you get is far less than the profit of playing more pins.

For me, the thrill of Plinko's game comes from striking a big multiplier and so I rarely go to bet on the small pins.

If you play with a strategy for a slowly rising balance, the good game option is with little pins

[CntryBoy]

I play Plinko quite often, and I can say I've honestly never tried the Low settings.  I always play High with a different number of pins, but seeing how the High settings have been killing me lately maybe I should try the Low settings to slowly rebuild.

[bobdole]

I don't, only because the odds of hitting the highest multiplier are so low, I'm not wasting the luck required to hit a 1000x on a 110x or 16x lol

[gougou]

I almost never played on low risk.once i remember a challenge and that was all.the biggest payout deosn't cover loses of 0.5x when it comes so i prefer to play medium risk 13,15,16 pins or high risk 12,15,16

[ceastem]

Hunting high multis are what makes playing plinko worth it especially you cannot increase in loss per bet.

That's why hunting high multis always works better for me than playing with few pins. Especially if I tend to play for a long time, those few pins payout just don't cut it. Unless of course we can have an increase in loss now and reset if win since we already have the auto bet option.

[GKD09]

Yeah true it seems very stupid to play plinko on low and if we look at the probabilities of hitting the last multiplier they are same for all difficulty levels. But that is only because the middle payouts are changed in a way. So as we all see, we get so many 0.2x when playing high, where as on low we don't get as that many 0.5x's. So technically if you hit any of the higher payouts after a long time it does almost the same thing - you will come to around the same profit/loss. Buutut if you hit it early, in the first 20 rolls say, you'd be really sorry that you didn't get it on the high settings  

I think low is mainly for wagering or trying to build up slow after increasing the bet after number of rolls, which worked out for me a bit  

[bmg]

In my opinion no I don't think the lower pins are worth playing.  I never go low always go high.

[Burgerwcheese]

12,13,14,15 are your best bet for sure.  I play 13/14/15 with 14 being my fav.  The lower pins honestly aren't even worth it from my experience.  And low/medium are also a bust for me.  Always play on high 

[williamshennie9]

I prefer lower risk when playing plinko, because I find that my bankroll lasts longer, and I can enjoy the game more. The only downside, is that the payouts are reduced, so hitting an outside pin would not pay as much.

[themrii]

I tried with a safer option, but I still lost money because of the risk it brought. The touch points x0.5 are always the preferred destination. With very low x5 points to achieve, I hope to be able to increase the auto bet when the target is lower x1.

[CntryBoy]

I have been trying out the Low setting a lot the last couple of days and am sort of enjoying it.  By playing them, my balance is slowly increasing oddly enough.  I used to play the High setting only and would have a good hit from time to time, but the long ass streaks of 0.2x could kill a balance rather quickly.  With the Low setting, it is much less likely to run long red streaks, therefore being able to build a balance.  It is very slow, but so far has been effective...

[Paecga129]

52 minutes ago, CntryBoy said:

I have been trying out the Low setting a lot the last couple of days and am sort of enjoying it.  By playing them, my balance is slowly increasing oddly enough.  I used to play the High setting only and would have a good hit from time to time, but the long ass streaks of 0.2x could kill a balance rather quickly.  With the Low setting, it is much less likely to run long red streaks, therefore being able to build a balance.  It is very slow, but so far has been effective...

Yes I think the low setting is very nice.    I hope you build up a very nice balance using this method.    It’s a slow build up but it is effective.   

[Jakubb]

Depends on the balance, but I only aim for the big boys, such us 1000x etc.

[jinz]

For me it is not worth it. The balls fall on 0.5x often and that is where it starts to get my balance killed, even if I hit the highest multiplier in the low pins but I got like long streaks of 0.5x it still don't give me profit so I prefer playing in high pins.

[htetaungxx]

today i tested in low pin in 8,9,10 rows i really work to walth. but allittle fast to reduce balance, but really nice when hit too recent twice in 8row 29. 9 rows 43. really awsome.

[ScooterPi]

i almost never bother with the high risk/high pin setting myself.  If i do, it is only for a handful of bets. 

overall, if i plan on playing a solid set of bets on plinko (which is very rare for me), i nearly always play the low to middle pins and switch between them every 5-10 bets.  seems to work for me more so than the big risk settings.

[nattekut]

it indeed is less risky. but I would suggest to play on low but pick an amount of pins where the min field is 0.7. I personally would rather pick LOW 9-11-13 or 15. I remember once I played low 13 with 0.10ETH during a mega 5,000$ race. I played 0.10ETH with 100k ETH basebet. I managed to wager almost 7ETH and I ended with 50% profits on my starting balance.

So I think it could be worthwile to try it out. But as we all know. in the long run you will get screwed. You can easily make 25-50% on your balance with low risk but then you must quit cause a red streak will follow