Jump to content

Slow and steady vs High risk, high reward?


LilIntroVert

Featured Comment

Posted

I think slow and steady would be the ideal way to gamble with less stress and sorrows when both stated philosophies are compared. :P

Posted

I play very high risk usually, and it leads me to ripping a lot more than make money, however when I do make money it is a lot more than what I started with because of my high stakes betting. Once my high stakes have paid off, I will then play slow and steady until I have made what I deem to myself is acceptable profit which is usually above 200 dollars.

Posted

patience is the key.. with patience accomplishing the goal that is set,, the rewards will have so much meaning.. blah.. win or lose.. as long you have fun in doing it,. and not bother you the whole while still doing it,.. dont care what other says.. and as long you know you... remember only god can judge you.,, the grass looks greener at the other side.. you better do something with your lawn. what other sayings.. bet high win big.. the best 1 i like. you came alone in this world and you will leave alone in this world.. 

Posted

Ofcourse, slow and steady, with high bets you're ripping tons, while with smaller you don't rip as much and you can recover it fast.

Posted

I tend towards low risk low reward and slow and steady because it is much safer and better if we think about it because if you have a huge balance and win some more it feels good.

Posted

I like the slow and steady option, although seeing such good wins and huge payouts from high rollers, I can sure say it is tempting to have the go big or go home mentality. Some people are also just super lucky.

Posted

Slow and steady baby! Always works for me or in other words high risk high reward never works out well for me. I am a slow accumulator and just like the stories from our childhood slow and steady wins the race, at least for me.

I always tend to lose trying to play higher payouts or even higher bets, since we don't like to lose. High payouts, when not seen for more than we thought we would we tend to increase our bet and so on. This just continues till we get somewhat mad and start rage betting. So I try to stay away from those. :)  

Posted

Slow and steady is my 1st preference while going all in is my 2nd preference when it comes to gambling in any kind of game on any site overall. Randomizing between these 2 helps out instead of sticking to a pattern.

Posted

High risker i am haha I always bet quite big and also i tend to go risky multipliers too. xD I feel like slow and steady I lose my patience with it :D

Posted

It is so difficult to maintain a slow and steady approach when it comes to gambling for real, I too often lose patience eventhough ideally and rationally I subscribe to this idea but so often gone wayward to a impulsive style gambling due to impatience. :(

Posted
3 hours ago, Etude said:

It is so difficult to maintain a slow and steady approach when it comes to gambling for real, I too often lose patience eventhough ideally and rationally I subscribe to this idea but so often gone wayward to a impulsive style gambling due to impatience. :(

Me too, it's crazy how we suddenly get consumed by a complete opposite alter ego out of no where and next thing you know your balance is 0 and you're now sad lol. It always happens too quickly for me too react and calm down.

Posted

High risk high reward for me I prefer! because it's more exciting i think also if have a big win i think easy to cash out. If slow and steady I get bored easy. But I think slow and steady betters get more even results which can be fun if they like trying new strategies. 

So I guess we just pick strategy that we prefer and some people might win more with slow and steady because they have much patience, but other people might not win very much because they get bored with slow steady and YOLO, but if they set their bankroll to have some shots at high risk maybe they would do better?

Good question for making us think about our strategies tnx lilintrovert !

Posted

I used to play almost always high risk, high reward.  Lately though I have been playing slow and steady about 75% of the time and going back to high risk every once in a while.  It seems to be working out for me so far, before I was busting much more frequently when almost always going for high risk.

Posted

I prefer slow and steady. because as long as I gamble this method that I use most often is very long to get a large profit but at least this method provides a little security compared to high risk

Posted

I think s

On 7/1/2019 at 8:44 PM, Etude said:

I think slow and steady would be the ideal way to gamble with less stress and sorrows when both stated philosophies are compared. :P

I agree with e to the tude as usual.    Slow and steady seems to always win the race.   Maybe on rare occasion it’s otherise.  

Posted

Well I've always heard slow & steady takes the cake, and that's all good but I just simply don't always have the patience for slow and steady.  I can start out that way but when I don't seem to make any progress I get frustrated and end up betting crazy & losing it all lol.

Posted

Hmm, i prefer high risk high reward but i like both. When me in a good mood, i prefer to play slow and steady with not high risk and enjoy the gambling itself but if i targeting a big profit, i use high risk high reward.

Posted

High Risk High Reward aka quicker speed, gives you a lower chance of the house edge catching up to you. The faster you get it done and over with, the faster your betting goes the faster you can win and get it over with before the chances of losing get too high.

Posted

I use both ways (if I have a large balance, then I use the method slowly. If I have a small balance, then I use High Risk to try my luck) :) but if for just a wager, I play slowly (provided my wager increases) 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Privacy Policy Terms of Use