Etude Posted July 5, 2019 #1 Posted July 5, 2019 Hey there everyone. What do you think if sidebets were added to Blackjack, would you fancy the idea of it? This below is an example of what do I mean by side bets offered by quite a few other casinos. I do understand that it would seems that the current Blackjack at Stake seems to be using possibly an infinite deck of cards? So for i order for Blackjack with Side bets to be applied a new Blackjack mode with limited decks e.g. 2 decks might be required. What do you all think about this?
barbaris Posted July 5, 2019 #2 Posted July 5, 2019 Limited Deck Mode would be interesting. But so you can figure out which cards are out of the game and your chance of winning is greatly enhanced. Here it seems to me that mathematics is already acting, and not complex software scripts or random.
CntryBoy Posted July 5, 2019 #3 Posted July 5, 2019 I love this idea for Black Jack. I have not seen these bonus payouts for BJ before, although I rarely play BJ online. These are very similar to the bonus payouts on three card poker or let it ride, and those are the main reason for playing and where most of the money can be made. I for one would play much more Black Jack if these betting options were added.
polor12 Posted July 5, 2019 #4 Posted July 5, 2019 ok talking about bonuses and a jackpot,, jackpot is getting all 4 aces or 3 7's,,, with a great payout,,and getting certain pairs etc. that would make the game more interesting to play. and with a jackpot that would keep growing till someone gets it.. will be a great reason to play 21 again, that is what the game is missing. something out of the ordinary that will catch players eyes.. hopefully stake would make this possible..
williamshennie9 Posted July 11, 2019 #5 Posted July 11, 2019 My local casino offers perfect pairs, and I love it! I think it is a great way to increase the income for the casino, and at the same time, provide a fun way to players to bet on the more risky side.
Featured Comment
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.