Yet another way to play dice

[hillowner45]

So recently I have been trying out this "new" method out on dice. I place a basebet of 1k sats on a 2x payout, if I lose i change the payout to 3x but don't touch the base bet. If I lose this bet then I change the payout to 4x. I keep increasing the payout till I win and I reset the payout back to 2x. It's not fool proof or anything, but I prefer it over any type of autobetting because you have full control over your balance and you can tap out at any time.

[kaleemmalik071]

well its good one its also looks like martiangle  .i 'll try it in future and 'll share my stats here

[ArmedRaccoon]

I don't think this strategy works as every time you lose you decrease the chance of winning.

2x payout - 50% chance

3x - 33%

4x - 25%

And so on...

You can easily go till 10x, where chance of winning is only 10%, and even further. You must be really lucky to play such a game and win

[jualid]

It sounds good but the risk is quite big like what if the roll is keep losing and continue to 10x or even 20x,50x. It will become harder to hit and the chance to win become smaller. 

[DoremiCloud]

This sounds quite on the risky side yet I'll probably give it a try and see if lady luck is on my side. Thanks though for the tip.

[StakePay]

I tried this strategy long time ago.
It worked for me well, but it is time consuming strategy and hence i dropped  it.
we love to earn but using this kind slow strategy sucks.

this is good strategy hope u will do something improvement in strategy to get more out of it.

[DoremiCloud]

Apparently, this did not work for me. On three occasions that is. Played for three 30 minutes with an hour interval but just got busted and stuff. Anyways, if it works well for you, then good luck. :-) I'm happy just to see others winning. Though of course I'd wanna win too.

[CntryBoy]

Definite;y sounds a bit risky, but I can see the logic behind it.  I have tried a similar approach at times with mixed results.

[Etude]

Seems like a rather risky way to be playing dice if you ask me and definitely require at least a good amount of bankroll to sustain the increasing multiplier payout after each losses.

[barbaris]

I, too, sometimes play by this principle and I also like it, that risk the same amount and increases only the multiplier. This is a kind of hunt, but only less safe in my opinion.

[cukup2]

 

in playing dice I prefer looking for payout 33 to 99 because in my opinion it is a relaxed game and it doesn't need to work on the strategy that I have set before. I have done various strategies in the dice but nothing has made me fit because I had just a short capitalization, but when I used the payout 33 strategy I was able to estimate how much my balance was in order to be able to withstand the longevity that would occur later

[jasonboss]

On 7/24/2019 at 1:30 AM, hillowner45 said:

So recently I have been trying out this "new" method out on dice. I place a basebet of 1k sats on a 2x payout, if I lose i change the payout to 3x but don't touch the base bet. If I lose this bet then I change the payout to 4x. I keep increasing the payout till I win and I reset the payout back to 2x. It's not fool proof or anything, but I prefer it over any type of autobetting because you have full control over your balance and you can tap out at any time.

ill try this, better to lose on 1k sat than to martingale all the way

[robertkalinak]

Your strategy sounds good, but i mean that you also need to set stop of raising multiplier because if you go over 99x then you musn't hit nothing but lose all your balance.

[Kate]

Why do i feel like this is a classic martingale but switched like instead of amount the multiplier is increased instead lol that is great idea so you wont loose and would win a good amount. 

[Enzo]

This is just payout martingale. Same thing as normal martingale but you increase your chances of NOT hitting it.

It can be risky but it requires a large bankroll or a small bet. Your bet size has to be very relative to your bankroll. 

[williamshennie9]

You can really bust quickly with this strategy. I mean, I could see it working for a short period of time, but increasing the multiplier each time makes it progressively harder to win, and you can but a base bet of 1k sats easily.

[Kulvin]

good strategy  

[nattekut]

it looks a bit like martingale but instead of increasing your bet you increase your multiplier. This of course is a way not to bust that fast cause your base bet remains the same but continuously increasing your multiplier you decrease the odds of winning so I guess you will get burned in the end as well only it will take a little longer cause you leave your base bet untouched

[mit777]

i am going to try this strategy today

[zulfandina]

betting strategy by increasing payout without doubling the amout bet?

hmm ... looks like it's worth a try ...
thank you for sharing your strategy ... and I wish you the luck of using your strategy ...

[Basant89]

it sounds  different, will surely try and let you know the status of my play for sure, thanks

[tartaunknow]

I have never tried this, I play X3 usually ^ ^ I will try now!

[sheenazbay]

I once got this strategy from my friend, but I have never tried it, because I doubt whether this strategy works or not. because if we lose 20 times, we will be in the payout position 20x, and the more we lose, the harder it is to hit. but whatever it is I might try it with a small bet

[Mahdirakib87]

Never think on that way but it sounds interesting. It could be a good idea. But gambling is a circle. All payout runs in same way. On lower payout you placing much bet and small profit. On big payout you placing small bet and large profit. Both are risky in same way. One single red can destroy in lower payout with big bet. And long red streak will destroy in high payout small bet. You are saying to start with 2× then increasing payout step by step like 3×..4×..5× or so. Without changing the bet. Would be nice way. Will give it a try and will see how it works. Good or bad 

[virgili0]

On 7/24/2019 at 1:30 AM, hillowner45 said:

So recently I have been trying out this "new" method out on dice. I place a basebet of 1k sats on a 2x payout, if I lose i change the payout to 3x but don't touch the base bet. If I lose this bet then I change the payout to 4x. I keep increasing the payout till I win and I reset the payout back to 2x. It's not fool proof or anything, but I prefer it over any type of autobetting because you have full control over your balance and you can tap out at any time.

i see post like this on limbo, increasing the payout instead of bet, this is interesting, way on profiting martingale on payout not on bet. maybe we can try this later.