Your opinion on 3x+ martingale?

[Enzo]

I know a lot of users on forum hate martingale and know it fails almost always. But I'm curious to know how many people martingale a multiplier higher then 3x, many times you don't have to even double your bet when martingaling those higher multipliers.

Some consider it safer but I think it's just as risky in the long run.

I used to play on a crash site where for awhile, a lot of users martingaled 90x, until a streak came with no 90x for like 950 games. Ripped most of the chasers minus a few.

If you have the bankroll to last higher X chases it can be quite profitable.

[SLFJ]

Have done it personally, and it's way riskier than you think, it can hit up to a 35 streak at once, it is so risky that I don't even do it anymore just because it busts you in no time, better do like 2.2-2.4x martingaling, that way you'll get more profit and not bust instantly.

Kind regards,

slfj.

[Enzo]

7 minutes ago, SLFJ said:

Have done it personally, and it's way riskier than you think, it can hit up to a 35 streak at once, it is so risky that I don't even do it anymore just because it busts you in no time, better do like 2.2-2.4x martingaling, that way you'll get more profit and not bust instantly.

Kind regards,

slfj.

That's a good idea, I think i'll try 2-2x-2.4x sometime, Any recommendations for on loss increase?

[SLFJ]

5 minutes ago, Enzo said:

That's a good idea, I think i'll try 2-2x-2.4x sometime, Any recommendations for on loss increase?

I keep my loss on increase at 90-110% usually, it's just your pick, test these like 90, 100, 110 and see which fits you the most, for me it's like in the middle kind of, I like 100-105% the most. Don't make it something crazy like 150%, insta bust.

[CntryBoy]

I will actually often play with 2.4x or 3x with 100% increase on loss for short runs, maybe 50 rolls or so.  It can be very profitable if you have a good seed with lots of numbers in that range.  It often hits 3-5 times in a row so the profits can add up quickly, but I also have to be prepared that I could lose quickly as well.

[ombrerico]

It's hard not to use martingale. Many times it is the only solution to earn what you need. The issue is always the size of the stall. A high bank with low profits may well be used with martingale. And putting a stop lose to make sure your bankroll doesn't go away.

[SLFJ]

40 minutes ago, CntryBoy said:

I will actually often play with 2.4x or 3x with 100% increase on loss for short runs, maybe 50 rolls or so.  It can be very profitable if you have a good seed with lots of numbers in that range.  It often hits 3-5 times in a row so the profits can add up quickly, but I also have to be prepared that I could lose quickly as well.

Definitely agreed with this, I do like the same thing just ranging from increase on loss to multipliers.

 

13 minutes ago, ombrerico said:

It's hard not to use martingale. Many times it is the only solution to earn what you need. The issue is always the size of the stall. A high bank with low profits may well be used with martingale. And putting a stop lose to make sure your bankroll doesn't go away.

Totally agreed with you too, have made over 3k doge with 700 doge with martingaling with stops, so it's definitely good to put it on stop on profit.

[CntryBoy]

18 minutes ago, ombrerico said:

It's hard not to use martingale. Many times it is the only solution to earn what you need. The issue is always the size of the stall. A high bank with low profits may well be used with martingale. And putting a stop lose to make sure your bankroll doesn't go away.

That is a good point as well utilizing the stop on profit and/or loss so that it does not get out of control.  Even with some good wins it can come back and bite us in the end.

[St0rmshad0w]

Yea 3x and 67% on loss is good

Or

3x and 16% on loss and -16% on win and set a limit of 5% profit 

[tartaunknow]

Me i play , many time en X3 with small bankroll . 
1/2 i double my bankroll but loose after ( i place "max loose" at my start bankroll , so if i double my bankroll and loose after i just have wager ^^ but no profit ) 

[St0rmshad0w]

I see

25 minutes ago, tartaunknow said:

Me i play , many time en X3 with small bankroll . 
1/2 i double my bankroll but loose after ( i place "max loose" at my start bankroll , so if i double my bankroll and loose after i just have wager ^^ but no profit ) 

 

[St0rmshad0w]

Enzo can i contact you on telegram? Username is Stormshadow_ss 

[zulfandina]

playing / betting at 3x is very high risk of losing, I have often tried it, because I myself like the 3.1x payout .. not the 3x payout ..

but this is the same ... betting 3x can get 45-60 red lines in a row ... I've tried it ... if I may give advice ... it's better to bet with 2.25x or 2.50x because it's more profitable ...
and if you play at 2.25x or 2.50x you feel the profit is too small, then play at 10x or 11x ... it's also better than playing at 3x ..

[Mahdirakib87]

I played on 3× many times. I like that way of game in dice. Try with 45%-55% increase in lose. And put a base bet of 10 sats. Your bankroll should be minimum 40k sats. Now run this game. I will suggest increase 45% on lose and reset to base bet on win. Stay at same site. High or low. Don't switch. I tried this strategy in dice most of the time and got good result aslo. I put stop after win. I try to collect like 40-80k sats. Don't try this method for long. I also played 2× 2.2× martingale. Though a long red streak comes always. 

[chankhoreID]

It all depends on the strategy of each player there might be more extreme use martiangle more than 3x of the basic bet and I think if you want to use a martiangle strategy we need to have enough capital to back up our bankroll so that we will not quickly bust we must have capital about 2x the basic bet so that we can stay in the martiangle.

[escimo13]

sometimes I play with 6x and 20% - 30% inc on lose. before starting, I always calculating to strong that will stand. after that I always set stop on profit, but forget to set stop on losing.

[BLXN]

the most successful strategy will use most of the figures, and payouts in a revolving manner in order to keep the results fresh, and to lower the chance of hitting a bad streak. if you  hit 10x with martingale, fuck off on that for a while, even if you hit it early, you might not hit it the second time..

[sheenazbay]

I often play Martingale, but play manually on Payout 2.2x. I pre-roll until I find 4 reds, and after that I will place my bet of 1000 sats (if the balance is 100k sats), and if it still gets red, I will raise the bet 2x, and so on until it hits

[Kevin Santos]

In my opinion even regular martingale is great if you do it right, so you have to bet really low that you can lose at least 12 bets in a row and play as close as you can to 50% chance win 

this is really slow profit but it is and really small chance of getting ripped

good luck everybody trying this on any type of game 

play responsible  

 

[zulfandina]

On 8/21/2019 at 2:13 AM, CntryBoy said:

I will actually often play with 2.4x or 3x with 100% increase on loss for short runs, maybe 50 rolls or so.  It can be very profitable if you have a good seed with lots of numbers in that range.  It often hits 3-5 times in a row so the profits can add up quickly, but I also have to be prepared that I could lose quickly as well.

2.4x payout with 100% onloss, it seems still in a reasonable stage ...
but if you hunt on payout 3x, with 100% onloss, according to me it's too high in the onloss ... because in payout 3x I have experienced 40 red lines in a row ... and it requires a bankroll that is big enough to hold the red line

[Ali saher]

I think 3x plus very risky and mostly chance to lose with this because if you hit this after 4,5 bits then I think not benefit to play this and I try some time but results not good so 2x playing on dice better then 3x plus playing but if you change your bit amount playing with 3x plus then maybe you got good results

[Xantys]

I have an excel spreadsheet where I calculate on-loss percentages for various X's. And yes, any from of Martingale is risky and eventually leads to a loss. The ony way to apply this strategy is with stop-loss.