SLFJ Posted September 8, 2019 #1 Posted September 8, 2019 Hey, I have hunted multipliers on both games and I would like your opinions on them both, Mines - went to hunt the majority of the multipliers, didn't work out that good for the higher ones, but I went on a 404x spree, I hit so much of them in so less time. On the other hand, Limbo, nice to hunt 1kx'es and not so good for 100 and below. Let me know, slfj.
georgepipi Posted September 8, 2019 #2 Posted September 8, 2019 I agree with you. Mines have a higher win rate than Limbo and Limbo has a higher risk rate than Mines. I think after Crash released Limbo was left behind because Crash was actually more fun and safer.
wngo123 Posted September 8, 2019 #3 Posted September 8, 2019 Of course in my opinion Mines are better to hunt for big multipliers than limbo. In Mines you can stop at any time and cashout, on limbo you will always lose you base bet. On mines you can recover balance , you decide when, just open a few tiles and cashout early. On limbo you can't do it, even when you lower target bet you still might not reach even 2x. Sure you can get bomb on first tile in mines but still I believe Mines are much easier game.
CntryBoy Posted September 8, 2019 #4 Posted September 8, 2019 It really depends what multipliers you are hunting. I believe Mines id better for the really big ones, but I have had better luck on Limbo with numbers like 100-1000x.
FotisNt Posted September 8, 2019 #5 Posted September 8, 2019 I would not agree to this one. Most high multipliers I got were on Limbo. Mines are annoying once you hit a bomb after having a high multiplier manually for me.
nuuuitsjdragon Posted September 9, 2019 #6 Posted September 9, 2019 Honestly I have seen the results vary too much even between 2 accounts so... the best thing to do is rely on your desired multiplier as Limbo has a limited win multiplier of 1,000,000x whereas Mines' limit is a cool 5,000,000. In that, we can assume that for most sessions/settings, Limbo would actually have lower variance than Mines and technically lower wins should come more often during a Limbo run, assuming it's not below your selected multiplier!
Kevin Santos Posted September 9, 2019 #7 Posted September 9, 2019 Actually in my opinion it might just be the luck, coincidence, I bet there are people who could experience the exact oposite than you
Forceowl17 Posted September 17, 2019 #8 Posted September 17, 2019 I think mines more easy than limbo cause limbo more risky
Ali saher Posted September 17, 2019 #9 Posted September 17, 2019 I think mines is best for limbo because on playing mines you have so many options and so many chances to hit so good multiplayer and you have a option to cashout when you see you got good payout and you not want to open next tile you can cashout. And limbo is very risky game maybe this game give you some good hit after so many rolls otherwise this game for me not give good results
wiro212sableng Posted September 17, 2019 #10 Posted September 17, 2019 On 9/8/2019 at 2:04 PM, SLFJ said: Hey, I have hunted multipliers on both games and I would like your opinions on them both, Mines - went to hunt the majority of the multipliers, didn't work out that good for the higher ones, but I went on a 404x spree, I hit so much of them in so less time. On the other hand, Limbo, nice to hunt 1kx'es and not so good for 100 and below. Let me know, slfj. I think easier to hit in limbo than mines. Limbo have a simple trick to hit multiplie. No need long run on limbo if we'reon lucky, so just placing bet on short term. Got it or leave it.
Xantys Posted September 18, 2019 #12 Posted September 18, 2019 I rarely hunt high multipliers in these games but I think someone can give a reasonable answer only after testing them over a statistically large number of bets. Otherwise the opinions are very much subjective.
gussigang Posted September 22, 2019 #13 Posted September 22, 2019 Mines is always risky because it's a random gamemode, it's like hilo basically because u never know the outcome.
Enzo Posted September 22, 2019 #14 Posted September 22, 2019 I almost would have to agree with you on that front. I think mines is by far easier to 'before you know it' end up with a big multiplier. Limbo on the other hand, you kinda are winning or youre not. At least with mines you can cash out at any time if you decide you profited enough.
Jlucash Posted September 22, 2019 #15 Posted September 22, 2019 i feel that mines is better for under 1kx multipliers and then limbo is better for the bigger ones
jkd123 Posted September 22, 2019 #16 Posted September 22, 2019 I prefer mines for high multipier thn limbo. No specific reason, just because I have been played mines before limbo release. Making pattern on mines is always fun 😄
neich Posted September 29, 2019 #17 Posted September 29, 2019 In my opinion it is Mines to hunt bigger multipliers instead of Limbo. my biggest hit on limbo was x36k and my 2nd biggest was only x3k on mines my biggest was "only" x25k but i got like over 30times hits like 2-8k on mines
Saaho2019 Posted September 29, 2019 #18 Posted September 29, 2019 As most of you are saying mines are easy to hunt big multiplier but my question is do you hunt manually or on auto bot ?
Featured Comment
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.