zulfandina Posted November 11, 2019 #1 Posted November 11, 2019 Every time I start betting, I believe that most gamblers will think about the game and analyze the balance they have. in that case, many people are trying to analyze betting calculations in a strategy that will be used in betting. but many don't analyze the possibility of defeat. because maybe when they have a large balance, they feel no need to analyze defeat. and this is the biggest mistake that gamblers don't realize. What about you, do you feel the need to analyze before you slide on a bet? If so, have you ever overlooked analyzing the possible losses that might occur when you have a large enough balance? let's chat for a while
dkpiiit953 Posted November 11, 2019 #2 Posted November 11, 2019 Hello, for some time I note each bet and analyze shots throw, I think that if I want to recover my losses I do not have much choice and I find an improvement in his bets, before I get card, I bet his wins so much better lose I bet more but in the end I found myself a loser. So yes I think that analyzing all these shots is the right solution. even if some do not because it's boring and it takes time!
wngo123 Posted November 11, 2019 #3 Posted November 11, 2019 I do not analyze anything when I have large balance and I make very risky bets because i don't believe that I will bust... aaaand then in the matter of minutes or hours I end up busting. That is really bad approach. but i can't help myself.
Mahdirakib87 Posted November 12, 2019 #4 Posted November 12, 2019 Analysing the bet doesn't work always. But I think it is helpful if you can do it properly. But you can't guess it properly most of the time. Luck will always there to defeat the analysis.
wngo123 Posted November 12, 2019 #5 Posted November 12, 2019 It is important to learn from mistakes, but we shouldn't look back to much into the past because it will kill us in gambling. We end up chasing the loses and thinking about old good days. It's better to correct mistakes and focus on the future.
sheenazbay Posted November 12, 2019 #6 Posted November 12, 2019 I always take into account the number of reds for the multiplier I use, but that does not mean I will succeed to win, but at least minimize losses, although sometimes the calculation of the amount of red that is estimated to be wrong
zulfandina Posted November 13, 2019 Author #7 Posted November 13, 2019 On 11/12/2019 at 5:55 AM, wngo123 said: I do not analyze anything when I have large balance and I make very risky bets because i don't believe that I will bust... aaaand then in the matter of minutes or hours I end up busting. That is really bad approach. but i can't help myself. I also experienced the same thing with you. I couldn't hold myself back when I bet, but because of that I also started analyzing the bets I would make before I bet. because I'm tired of all the relentless losses I've experienced in the past few months
Ali saher Posted November 13, 2019 #8 Posted November 13, 2019 When I play gambling then I always set a target how much I win then I stop game and take break and I play always same mind and always I play very risky game because I play always with my extra money for gambling so if I lose I have no problems so I not think about this before game I just play I come for winning
zulfandina Posted November 15, 2019 Author #9 Posted November 15, 2019 On 11/14/2019 at 1:03 AM, Ali saher said: When I play gambling then I always set a target how much I win then I stop game and take break and I play always same mind and always I play very risky game because I play always with my extra money for gambling so if I lose I have no problems so I not think about this before game I just play I come for winning It seems that your analysis is only limited to finding the winning target, while in some gamblers, they do the analysis before starting the bet as they analyze the amount of red on payout so and so, calculate the amount of balance that is owned and determine how many appropriate stop losses and so on.
Featured Comment
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.