Administrator Edward Posted December 6, 2017 Administrator #1 Posted December 6, 2017 https://cryptogambling.org/ The CGF (Crypto Gambling Foundation) sets aside a goal to bring together all websites with the same take on gambling; fairness & transparency. You can find all the information about what we're about on the website above. The main defining factor is the fairness aspect however, we need you to have a fully provably fair website. I'm wondering, what websites do you think meet this criteria and deserve to be a part of it?
wilberthh Posted December 6, 2017 #2 Posted December 6, 2017 25 minutes ago, Edward said: The main defining factor is the fairness aspect however, we need you to have a fully provably fair website. I'm wondering, what websites do you think meet this criteria and deserve to be a part of it? I think stake is one of it! Best casino site ever
Kargai Posted December 6, 2017 #3 Posted December 6, 2017 Primedice and Stake of course I'll add Bitvest, Bitsler and Bitdice. I read some brawls for one or another of those (ex Bitsler) but not about the provably fair aspect, more about faucets issues or them banning non depositor & co.
barbaris Posted December 6, 2017 #4 Posted December 6, 2017 8 hours ago, Kargai said: Primedice and Stake of course PD and Stake are the best sites. Bitsler not honest with users. People who made deposits and played for a long time were banned without explanation, this I hear recently very often. Well, you can probably add DuckDice and FortuneJack. But they are less popular, but honest.
Ugeller Posted December 7, 2017 #6 Posted December 7, 2017 The only betting websites I know are Stakes and Primedice. I think those 2 are the main refferences when you think of bitcoin gambling
wilbur Posted December 7, 2017 #7 Posted December 7, 2017 haha I love stake, bitvest and bitkong plus duck dice. they're the coolest site I know so far
Grifter Posted December 7, 2017 #8 Posted December 7, 2017 22 hours ago, Edward said: https://cryptogambling.org/ The CGF (Crypto Gambling Foundation) sets aside a goal to bring together all websites with the same take on gambling; fairness & transparency. You can find all the information about what we're about on the website above. The main defining factor is the fairness aspect however, we need you to have a fully provably fair website. I'm wondering, what websites do you think meet this criteria and deserve to be a part of it? we love our own, @Edward. Stake and Primedice ofcourse... so More powers to us especially Stake.com
jkd123 Posted December 8, 2017 #9 Posted December 8, 2017 maybe crypto-games.net.. it's just because im still on green profit there.
nhoyasim101 Posted December 8, 2017 #11 Posted December 8, 2017 stake and primedice is a best when it comes to crypto gambling ever,, but since this is open for suggestion. i recommend SHARKOIN and PHAROAH DICE,
Ymerej Posted December 8, 2017 #12 Posted December 8, 2017 stake.com the site where winning is posible
Dimka27 Posted December 8, 2017 #13 Posted December 8, 2017 всем привет, я вот начинал с ПД потом ознакомился с Битцлером и меньше времени начал играть на ПД но на пд выложили ссылку на Stake и с того момента понеслось, ПД и betler теперь очень редко играю sorry translator does not translate correctly
irazta Posted December 8, 2017 #14 Posted December 8, 2017 I think forum can add Bitsler.com and crypto-games.net
NatalyD Posted December 8, 2017 #15 Posted December 8, 2017 On 06.12.2017 at 11:27 PM, barbaris said: PD and Stake are the best sites. Bitsler not honest with users. People who made deposits and played for a long time were banned without explanation, this I hear recently very often. Well, you can probably add DuckDice and FortuneJack. But they are less popular, but honest. thats true, Bitsler is not honest. they dont let you to withdraw your wins
skillex Posted December 8, 2017 #16 Posted December 8, 2017 If i have to rate all gambling website I encounter; Champion: stake 1st: Primedice 2nd: Duckdice 3rd: Yolodice 4th: Bitsler
Featured Comment
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.