New rule to not allow member to win more than one big giveaway a month

[KNOWN]

Due to recent events i have noticed only a few users winning every single contest, these users already win large amounts of up to 0.1on prwvious contests and use the huge bank roll to continuously top poorer users. I think that it shouldnt be allowed for  a user to participate in more than one contest a month in order to allow other users to even stand a chance. Please consider my opinion before making judgement as a lot of people i have speaken to agree with me. 

I submit that the top 5 winners of a previous contest should not be allowed to participate in the next... to allow everyone a fair chance to win even with a lower bank roll.

[rockingmonk]

3 minutes ago, KNOWN said:

Due to recent events i have noticed only a few users winning every single contest, these users already win large amounts of up to 0.1 and use the huge bank roll to continuously top poorer users. I think that it shouldnt be allowed for  a user to participate in more than one contest a month in order to allow other users to even stand a chance. Please consider my opinion before making judgement as a lot of people i have speaken to agree with me. 

I do agree with you Known.. I saw people winning more than 1 contest just bcoz they have good balance in wallet and can win it easily.

I dont those say ppl are wrong but yeah i wud totally support to allow ppl for winning one contest per month only. it will increase chances for others to win.

Thanks!

[Snike]

As sad as it is. Stake needs the big members with huge bankrolls to participate in these giveaways so they loose as much money as possible but at the same time stake wins the money. But me personally, I think this rule should be implemented directly!

[Shaniqua]

14 hours ago, Snike said:

As sad as it is. Stake needs the big members with huge bankrolls to participate in these giveaways so they loose as much money as possible but at the same time stake wins the money. But me personally, I think this rule should be implemented directly!

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
haha thats interesting way looking at it,                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
kinda makes sense in a weird way lol.                                                                                                                                                                                                                        

[Neverever]

first off, from a purely business standpoint, stake has to consider weighing the profitability between the two groups, and im pretty certain if they had to pick one to make happy, the ones that deposit and generate profits for the casino would definitely take priority over the daily faucet leeches. 

That being said, are the events really that close together that someone would hold onto their winnings off the last one by the time the next one begins? not too sure how much of an edge they actually get from that little prize tho. 

If anything, why not simply just do away with the whoever bets more wins system and chose another factor like the one in the hi lo event. that should be fair.

[MakeMoney]

For us, the members this rule would be great because all the times new giveaways appear big members with the biggest amount of money take the lead. For Stake this would not be a good rule because those big members are not going to be active on stake anymore and they are going to look for other giveaways

[Fedor07]

This is a really good idea for us .  Its not  correct for us , those who are winning more them 1 contest in a month will stop winning after this rule is going to go in.