Jump to content

How Limbo can lose many times in 1.4x?


kearol

Featured Comment

Posted

Is gamble . Can be happened .

Don't worry if they want to scam they will not for your bet 174$. That's nothing  . Why to do that ? .. if they want to do something they will for highrollers . 50k$ bets + . But I'm sure no ....

 

Posted

This is so normal in any games even dice , I had 10 reds on 70% , so yeah it is random and everything is purely based on luck. Maybe the good strategy is to switch between the payouts and not rely on the single payout.

Posted
11 hours ago, mmiikkee1520 said:

actually, if you use a calculator, you could see that the odds of getting 7 losses in a row with a 29.29% chance of losing is 1.8 in 10,000.  so it is in fact, very unlikely.  so if you did 5000 bets, it should be in your favour to not hit a streak of 7.  you showed the odds of WINNING 7 in a row, not LOSING.  misinformation like this is what prevents people from seeing the truth about stake and their provably fair and how it is rigged.

I showed both the winning and losing odds of that streak happening. 7 consecutive wins has a 100% chance of occurring over the course of 1000 rolls. 7 consecutive losses has a 12% chance of occurring over 1000 rolls.  

You unironically calling that math misinformation is hilarious. Thanks for the laugh. 

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
On 9/2/2021 at 1:19 PM, ltcDaddy said:

I showed both the winning and losing odds of that streak happening. 7 consecutive wins has a 100% chance of occurring over the course of 1000 rolls. 7 consecutive losses has a 12% chance of occurring over 1000 rolls.  

You unironically calling that math misinformation is hilarious. Thanks for the laugh. 

"7 consecutive wins has a 100% chance of occurring over the course of 1000 rolls" . Are you sure you know probability? Even getting 1 win in 1000 rolls isn't 100%

  • Moderator
Posted
5 hours ago, narc said:

"7 consecutive wins has a 100% chance of occurring over the course of 1000 rolls" . Are you sure you know probability? Even getting 1 win in 1000 rolls isn't 100%

Nothing is 100% sure. Thats a fact.

The question is how many decimal numbers are we going to use after the decimal point to write a number.

At 1.4X the chance of winning at least 1 bet in 1000 its 99.999999..........99999%, and there are a looooot of 9s for sure.

You can ask the opposite question (how probable is to get 1000 reds in a row at 1.4X) and substract this number from 100% to get the other answer.

If you think rounding 99.9999999999999 (and 100s of 9s more) to 100% is not right, then good luck writing all those 9s here (if they even fit 1 single forum message).

 

  • Moderator
Posted
On 8/29/2021 at 6:32 PM, mmiikkee1520 said:

not random at all. try aiming for 2.00x on $5 for 50 bets, now, do the same thing, aim for 2.00x but now bet $0.50.  notice anything?  I bet you will.  if you have not tried this out, don't even dare to tell people it's random because this proves otherwise.  Don't listen to the employees here posting how 'random' it is, or how that it is just 'how gambling works' 

Do you have those charts to show us? for example, 10000 bets of $0.5, 10000 bets of $0.1, 10000 bets of $5, to compare?

Thank you !!

 

  • 1 month later...
Posted
On 8/30/2021 at 12:16 AM, ltcDaddy said:

image.thumb.png.0c74052a16a1e691249fa572474a47cd.png
12% chance of happening in 1000 rolls. 6% in 500, etc.
I'm not saying your other points are invalid, just that this is not unlikely whatsoever.

Can you link that tool?

Posted

It's all about seed, check it and also make sure your client seed is in blockchain format like the server seed, you will see a big difference, also just to add its interesting that games don't have their own seed in stake that's what really makes it provable fair. There are others out there who have this so maybe a way to improve

Posted
2 hours ago, Tek1089 said:

It's all about seed, check it and also make sure your client seed is in blockchain format like the server seed, you will see a big difference, also just to add its interesting that games don't have their own seed in stake that's what really makes it provable fair. There are others out there who have this so maybe a way to improve

None of this is true.

It's not all about your seed.  It's about basic math - the probability of an event happening.

Format of your seed doesn't matter even a little bit.  

Each game having it's own seed is not what 'really makes it provably fair'.

Posted

I love music and games, if your interests coincide with mine, I recommend reading the article Beat The Holiday Blues At Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Atlantic City https://www.forbes.com/sites/katiechang/2021/11/30/beat-the-holiday-blues-at-hard-rock-hotel--casino-atlantic-city/

Posted

Idk man. I hate limbo.  But I'm in the same boat as you now. Broke as a joke! 😔

I hit 1000x one time on limbo but it was when I was betting 0.00248 because I was halfing my penny as I was going broke and it hit over 7000.. it gave me $2.48 lol. Most of the time limbo just gives me shitty shit shit multipliers.  Or when I'm betting 100x it'll hit 99.48 or some shit like that. Its all malarky and it only pays when it wants to. If its not slated to hit then it'll just rip until your broke.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Privacy Policy Terms of Use