respektvlad Posted September 19, 2021 #1 Posted September 19, 2021 I bet for a long time on sporting events not only on Stake.com but also on other bookmakers, but in my own currency, that is, in rubles! I don't like that, for example, in football they give in the first half, both teams will score on Stake.com, let's say the odds are 3.60, while in other offices, almost everywhere the odds are 4.50-5! Or let's say I bet today on Stake.com on Tottenham-Chelsea football the first half was 0-0. I bet that both teams will score 3.85 in the second half when other offices give odds not lower than 4.50-5. I believe that stake.com underestimates large coefficients compared to other bookmakers! If people bet large sums of money, then the difference in coefficients is very significant, one might even say huge. Although Stake.com says that it raises the coefficients for some events, it does not matter at all, since all other matches are underestimating the coefficients. Please do not take my words as a reason for aggression, this is just purely my personal opinion 😇
Nadirka Posted September 19, 2021 #2 Posted September 19, 2021 You are wrong. Stake dont calculate odds. They uses same provider as other bookmakers. They have lowest margin 1-5% in market, in contrast with 10-15% margin somewhere else
vojtech5 Posted September 19, 2021 #3 Posted September 19, 2021 2 hours ago, respektvlad said: I bet for a long time on sporting events not only on Stake.com but also on other bookmakers, but in my own currency, that is, in rubles! I don't like that, for example, in football they give in the first half, both teams will score on Stake.com, let's say the odds are 3.60, while in other offices, almost everywhere the odds are 4.50-5! Or let's say I bet today on Stake.com on Tottenham-Chelsea football the first half was 0-0. I bet that both teams will score 3.85 in the second half when other offices give odds not lower than 4.50-5. I believe that stake.com underestimates large coefficients compared to other bookmakers! If people bet large sums of money, then the difference in coefficients is very significant, one might even say huge. Although Stake.com says that it raises the coefficients for some events, it does not matter at all, since all other matches are underestimating the coefficients. Please do not take my words as a reason for aggression, this is just purely my personal opinion 😇 They have actually quite a good odds what is the problem is: 1) not able to bet much more often than anywhere else 2) ridiculous betting limits especially on esport, sometimes even 20 USD is too much for my account 3) cash out is sorry guys but joke, sometimes it is reloading so long that you cant cash out even trough half time, because it is realoading
respektvlad Posted September 19, 2021 Author #4 Posted September 19, 2021 2 hours ago, Nadirka said: You are wrong. Stake dont calculate odds. They uses same provider as other bookmakers. They have lowest margin 1-5% in market, in contrast with 10-15% margin somewhere else You're right! I think most of all this has to do with live matches, as the odds are sometimes very different during the match! I would not write this post just like that. I constantly faced this problem when I had to bet in another office because of the difference in coefficients! For example, a live match and the next goal of an outsider give on stake, let's say 3.2x I have to bet elsewhere for the coefficient of the next goal of 4.40 I have several applications with bookmakers installed and they all give a coefficient higher from 4.00x to 4.50x 2 hours ago, Nadirka said: You are wrong. Stake dont calculate odds. They uses same provider as other bookmakers. They have lowest margin 1-5% in market, in contrast with 10-15% margin somewhere else 2 hours ago, Nadirka said: You are wrong. Stake dont calculate odds. They uses same provider as other bookmakers. They have lowest margin 1-5% in market, in contrast with 10-15% margin somewhere else after a while the difference becomes more and more significant
Featured Comment
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.